RetroSearch Browse

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://www.w3resource.com/PostgreSQL/snippets/postgresql-vs-dynamodb.php below:

Website Navigation

Comparing PostgreSQL and DynamoDB: A Detailed Guide

Comparing PostgreSQL and DynamoDB: A Detailed GuideLast update on December 28 2024 13:04:37 (UTC/GMT +8 hours)

PostgreSQL vs DynamoDB: A Comprehensive Comparison

PostgreSQL and DynamoDB are two prominent database systems, each catering to different use cases. PostgreSQL is an open-source, relational database management system (RDBMS), while DynamoDB is a NoSQL, fully managed database service by AWS. Below, we explore their differences, features, and use cases.

PostgreSQL Overview

PostgreSQL is a robust, open-source relational database system known for its advanced features and compliance with SQL standards.

Key Features:

ACID compliance for reliable transactions.
Extensibility with custom data types and functions.
Strong support for SQL standards.
Advanced indexing, full-text search, and JSON support.

Common Use Cases: Financial systems, e-commerce platforms, and applications requiring complex queries and relational data.

Syntax Example:

-- Creating a table in PostgreSQL
CREATE TABLE users (
    id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,  -- Auto-incremented primary key
    name VARCHAR(100),      -- User's name
    email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE,  -- Unique email
    created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP  -- Record timestamp
);

Explanation:

CREATE TABLE: Defines a new table.
SERIAL PRIMARY KEY: Creates an auto-incrementing primary key.
VARCHAR: Defines string fields with length constraints.
DEFAULT: Sets a default value for the column.

DynamoDB Overview:

DynamoDB is a NoSQL database service designed for scalable, low-latency applications, managed entirely by AWS.

Key Features:

Serverless architecture with automatic scaling.
Schema-less design for flexibility.
Built-in support for global tables and distributed workloads.
Integration with AWS services for enhanced capabilities.

Common Use Cases: Real-time applications, IoT devices, and workloads with unpredictable traffic patterns.

Code Example (AWS SDK for Python - Boto3):

Code:

# Importing Boto3 library
import boto3

# Creating a DynamoDB resource
dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')

# Defining the table structure
table = dynamodb.create_table(
    TableName='Users',
    KeySchema=[
        {'AttributeName': 'UserID', 'KeyType': 'HASH'}  # Partition key
    ],
    AttributeDefinitions=[
        {'AttributeName': 'UserID', 'AttributeType': 'S'}  # String type
    ],
    ProvisionedThroughput={
        'ReadCapacityUnits': 5,
        'WriteCapacityUnits': 5
    }
)

# Wait until the table exists
table.meta.client.get_waiter('table_exists').wait(TableName='Users')

print("Table created successfully.")

Explanation:

boto3.resource('dynamodb'): Creates a DynamoDB resource object.
create_table: Defines a new table with attributes and keys.
ProvisionedThroughput: Configures read and write capacity.

PostgreSQL vs DynamoDB: Key Differences

Feature PostgreSQL DynamoDB Type Relational (SQL) NoSQL (Key-Value, Document) Scaling Vertical and horizontal (manual) Automatic horizontal scaling Schema Fixed (schema-based) Schema-less (flexible) Query Language SQL NoSQL (Proprietary APIs, JSON) Transactions ACID-compliant Limited ACID support Hosting Self-hosted or cloud-managed Fully managed (AWS-only) Cost Depends on hosting setup Pay-as-you-go pricing model

When to Choose PostgreSQL?

Applications requiring structured data and complex relationships.
Scenarios where SQL query flexibility is a priority.
Use cases involving transactional integrity and data consistency.

When to Choose DynamoDB?

Applications with massive, unpredictable workloads.
Real-time analytics or IoT systems.
Developers seeking minimal operational overhead.

All PostgreSQL Questions, Answers, and Code Snippets Collection.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4