Found 3 records.
Status: Held for Document Update (3) RFC 5695, "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows", November 2009Source of RFC: bmwg (ops)
Errata ID: 1972
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 5 (Table) says:
[...]
Port Media GigE (Gigabit Ethernet),
POS, ATM, etc.
| Port Speed 1 gbps, 100 Mbps, etc.
^
Interface Encapsulation Ethernet, Ethernet
VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc.
[...]
It should say:
[...]
Port Media GigE (Gigabit Ethernet),
POS, ATM, etc.
| Port Speed 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc.
^
Interface Encapsulation Ethernet, Ethernet
VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc.
[...]
Notes:
Rationale:
Case matters for powers-of-ten indicating prefix characters in
SI unit designators; "G" = Giga (= 10^9); "g" is still undefined.
Errata ID: 1970
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 4.1.2 says:
vv | It is RECOMMENDED that all of the ports (A1, DA1, DB1, and A2) on the DUT and test tool support a dynamic Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) for routing such as IS-IS, OSPF, RIP, etc. [...]
It should say:
vvvvvvvv | It is RECOMMENDED that all of the ports (A1, DA1, DB1, and B1, etc.) on the DUT and test tool support a dynamic Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) for routing such as IS-IS, OSPF, RIP, etc. [...]
Notes:
Rationale:
The text (on top of page 6 of the RFC) should refer to all four
columns in Figure 1 (on page 4); "A2" as the name of a second entity
in the first coulumn seems to be redundant; therefore, s/A2/B1/ ;
additionally, ", etc." suggested as an indication of the other rows.
Errata ID: 1971
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 4.1.4.1 says:
(last paragraph:) MPLS label values used in any test case MUST be outside the reserved | label value (0-15) unless stated otherwise.
It should say:
MPLS label values used in any test case MUST be outside the reserved
| label value range (0-15) unless stated otherwise.
^^^^^^^
Notes:
Rationale:
"(0-15)" is not "the reserved label value".
To avoid confusion, more precise language should be used.
Inserting "range" seems to be the smallest sensical change.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4