Found 1 record.
Status: Held for Document Update (1) RFC 5387, "Problem and Applicability Statement for Better-Than-Nothing Security (BTNS)", November 2008Source of RFC: btns (sec)
Errata ID: 1618
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-11-24
Held for Document Update by: Tim Polk
Section 4, pg.15 says:
BTNS is intended for services open to the public but for which protected associations are desired, and for services that can be authenticated at higher layers in the protocol stack. BTNS can also provide some level of protection for private services when the | alternative BTNS is no protection at all.
It should say:
BTNS is intended for services open to the public but for which
protected associations are desired, and for services that can be
authenticated at higher layers in the protocol stack. BTNS can also
provide some level of protection for private services when the
| alternative to BTNS is no protection at all.
^^^^
Notes:
Rationale: Distorting word omission.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4