A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806540 below:

Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

Clinical Trial

. 2020 Jan;21(1):162-174. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9. Epub 2019 Dec 2. Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial Nuria Porta  2 Diletta Bianchini  3 Ursula McGovern  4 Tony Elliott  5 Robert Jones  6 Isabel Syndikus  7 Christy Ralph  8 Suneil Jain  9 Mohini Varughese  10 Omi Parikh  11 Simon Crabb  12 Angus Robinson  13 Duncan McLaren  14 Alison Birtle  15 Jacob Tanguay  16 Susana Miranda  2 Ines Figueiredo  2 George Seed  2 Claudia Bertan  2 Penny Flohr  2 Berni Ebbs  2 Pasquale Rescigno  3 Gemma Fowler  2 Ana Ferreira  2 Ruth Riisnaes  2 Rita Pereira  2 Andra Curcean  3 Robert Chandler  3 Matthew Clarke  2 Bora Gurel  2 Mateus Crespo  2 Daniel Nava Rodrigues  2 Shahneen Sandhu  17 Aude Espinasse  2 Peter Chatfield  2 Nina Tunariu  3 Wei Yuan  2 Emma Hall  2 Suzanne Carreira  2 Johann S de Bono  18

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Clinical Trial

Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

Joaquin Mateo et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan.

. 2020 Jan;21(1):162-174. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9. Epub 2019 Dec 2. Authors Joaquin Mateo  1 Nuria Porta  2 Diletta Bianchini  3 Ursula McGovern  4 Tony Elliott  5 Robert Jones  6 Isabel Syndikus  7 Christy Ralph  8 Suneil Jain  9 Mohini Varughese  10 Omi Parikh  11 Simon Crabb  12 Angus Robinson  13 Duncan McLaren  14 Alison Birtle  15 Jacob Tanguay  16 Susana Miranda  2 Ines Figueiredo  2 George Seed  2 Claudia Bertan  2 Penny Flohr  2 Berni Ebbs  2 Pasquale Rescigno  3 Gemma Fowler  2 Ana Ferreira  2 Ruth Riisnaes  2 Rita Pereira  2 Andra Curcean  3 Robert Chandler  3 Matthew Clarke  2 Bora Gurel  2 Mateus Crespo  2 Daniel Nava Rodrigues  2 Shahneen Sandhu  17 Aude Espinasse  2 Peter Chatfield  2 Nina Tunariu  3 Wei Yuan  2 Emma Hall  2 Suzanne Carreira  2 Johann S de Bono  18 Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is enriched in DNA damage response (DDR) gene aberrations. The TOPARP-B trial aims to prospectively validate the association between DDR gene aberrations and response to olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Methods: In this open-label, investigator-initiated, randomised phase 2 trial following a selection (or pick-the-winner) design, we recruited participants from 17 UK hospitals. Men aged 18 years or older with progressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with one or two taxane chemotherapy regimens and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less had tumour biopsies tested with targeted sequencing. Patients with DDR gene aberrations were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated minimisation method, with balancing for circulating tumour cell count at screening, to receive 400 mg or 300 mg olaparib twice daily, given continuously in 4-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Neither participants nor investigators were masked to dose allocation. The primary endpoint of confirmed response was defined as a composite of all patients presenting with any of the following outcomes: radiological objective response (as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1), a decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 50% or more (PSA50) from baseline, or conversion of circulating tumour cell count (from ≥5 cells per 7·5 mL blood at baseline to <5 cells per 7·5 mL blood). A confirmed response in a consecutive assessment after at least 4 weeks was required for each component. The primary analysis was done in the evaluable population. If at least 19 (43%) of 44 evaluable patients in a dose cohort responded, then the dose cohort would be considered successful. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of olaparib. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682772. Recruitment for the trial has completed and follow-up is ongoing.

Findings: 711 patients consented for targeted screening between April 1, 2015, and Aug 30, 2018. 161 patients had DDR gene aberrations, 98 of whom were randomly assigned and treated (49 patients for each olaparib dose), with 92 evaluable for the primary endpoint (46 patients for each olaparib dose). Median follow-up was 24·8 months (IQR 16·7-35·9). Confirmed composite response was achieved in 25 (54·3%; 95% CI 39·0-69·1) of 46 evaluable patients in the 400 mg cohort, and 18 (39·1%; 25·1-54·6) of 46 evaluable patients in the 300 mg cohort. Radiological response was achieved in eight (24·2%; 11·1-42·3) of 33 evaluable patients in the 400 mg cohort and six (16·2%; 6·2-32·0) of 37 in the 300 mg cohort; PSA50 response was achieved in 17 (37·0%; 23·2-52·5) of 46 and 13 (30·2%; 17·2-46·1) of 43; and circulating tumour cell count conversion was achieved in 15 (53·6%; 33·9-72·5) of 28 and 13 (48·1%; 28·7-68·1) of 27. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event in both cohorts was anaemia (15 [31%] of 49 patients in the 300 mg cohort and 18 [37%] of 49 in the 400 mg cohort). 19 serious adverse reactions were reported in 13 patients. One death possibly related to treatment (myocardial infarction) occurred after 11 days of treatment in the 300 mg cohort.

Interpretation: Olaparib has antitumour activity against metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DDR gene aberrations, supporting the implementation of genomic stratification of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in clinical practice.

Funding: Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, Prostate Cancer UK, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres Network, and the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres.

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

(A) Trial profile and (B)…

Figure 1

(A) Trial profile and (B) DDR gene alterations in the intention-to-treat population (n=98)…

Figure 1

(A) Trial profile and (B) DDR gene alterations in the intention-to-treat population (n=98) DDR=DNA damage response. CTC=circulating tumour cell. *Non-mutually exclusive subgroups: one patient had BRCA1/2, CDK12, and other mutations, and two patients had both PALB2 and other mutations (included in each subgroup). †The BRCA2 K3226* variant is supposedly non-pathogenic and was therefore not considered sufficient for patients to be considered eligible; however, one patient with a BRCA2 K3226* variant was included because of evidence of concomitant loss of the contralateral allele.

Figure 2

Antitumour activity by allocated dose…

Figure 2

Antitumour activity by allocated dose cohort (intention-to-treat population) (A) Best percentage change from…

Figure 2

Antitumour activity by allocated dose cohort (intention-to-treat population) (A) Best percentage change from baseline in PSA during treatment. (B) Best percentage change from baseline in the sum of target lesions (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1·1) during treatment. (C) Radiographic progression-free survival. (D) Swimmers plot of time on treatment for each patient, indicating periods of treatment interruptions, dose reductions, and, in the 300 mg cohort, dose escalations. Treatment periods of ≥6 months and ≥12 months are highlighted. PSA=prostate-specific antigen. PSA50=decrease in prostate-specific antigen of ≥50%.

Figure 3

Antitumour activity by gene aberration…

Figure 3

Antitumour activity by gene aberration subgroup (intention-to-treat population, pooled 300 mg and 400…

Figure 3

Antitumour activity by gene aberration subgroup (intention-to-treat population, pooled 300 mg and 400 mg cohorts) (A) Maximum percentage change from baseline in PSA during treatment. (B) Maximum percentage change from baseline in the sum of target lesions (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1·1) during treatment. (C) Radiographic progression-free survival. (D) Swimmers plot of time on treatment for each patient. ITT=intention-to-treat. NE=not estimable. PSA=prostate-specific antigen. PSA50=decrease in prostate-specific antigen of ≥50%. *Patients presenting with mutliple mutations are represented in a single subgroup.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Attard G, Parker C, Eeles RA. Prostate cancer. Lancet. 2016;387:70–82. - PubMed
    1. Armenia J, Wankowicz SAM, Liu D. The long tail of oncogenic drivers in prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2018;50:645–651. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson D, Van Allen EM, Wu YM. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell. 2015;162:454. - PubMed
    1. Quigley DA, Dang HX, Zhao SG. Genomic hallmarks and structural variation in metastatic prostate cancer. Cell. 2018;174:758. 69.e9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005;434:917–921. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3