Review
. 2017 Aug 1;109(8):djw323. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw323. Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical StudiesAffiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Review
Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical StudiesXiaoxin I Yao et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017.
. 2017 Aug 1;109(8):djw323. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw323. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: : Propensity score (PS) analysis is increasingly being used in observational studies, especially in some cancer studies where random assignment is not feasible. This systematic review evaluates the use and reporting quality of PS analysis in oncology studies.
Methods: : We searched PubMed to identify the use of PS methods in cancer studies (CS) and cancer surgical studies (CSS) in major medical, cancer, and surgical journals over time and critically evaluated 33 CS published in top medical and cancer journals in 2014 and 2015 and 306 CSS published up to November 26, 2015, without earlier date limits. The quality of reporting in PS analysis was evaluated. It was also compared over time and among journals with differing impact factors. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: More than 50% of the publications with PS analysis from the past decade occurred within the past two years. Of the studies critically evaluated, a considerable proportion did not clearly provide the variables used to estimate PS (CS 12.1%, CSS 8.8%), incorrectly included non baseline variables (CS 3.4%, CSS 9.3%), neglected the comparison of baseline characteristics (CS 21.9%, CSS 15.6%), or did not report the matching algorithm utilized (CS 19.0%, CSS 36.1%). In CSS, the reporting of the matching algorithm improved in 2014 and 2015 ( P = .04), and the reporting of variables used to estimate PS was better in top surgery journals ( P = .008). However, there were no statistically significant differences for the inclusion of non baseline variables and reporting of comparability of baseline characteristics.
Conclusions: The use of PS in cancer studies has dramatically increased recently, but there is substantial room for improvement in the quality of reporting even in top journals. Herein we have proposed reporting guidelines for PS analyses that are broadly applicable to different areas of medical research that will allow better evaluation and comparison across studies applying this approach.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
FiguresFigure 1.
Process of literature search: (…
Figure 1.
Process of literature search: ( A ) cancer studies in top medical and…
Figure 1.Process of literature search: (A) cancer studies in top medical and cancer journals and (B) cancer surgical studies. *Other reasons are given in Supplementary Table 1 (available online).
Figure 2.
Publication trends in cancer studies…
Figure 2.
Publication trends in cancer studies reporting use of propensity score analysis in high-impact…
Figure 2.Publication trends in cancer studies reporting use of propensity score analysis in high-impact medical/cancer and surgery journals.
Similar articlesWu R, Glen P, Ramsay T, Martel G. Wu R, et al. Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 28;3:70. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-70. Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24972453 Free PMC article.
Song TJ, Leng HF, Zhong LL, Wu TX, Bian ZX. Song TJ, et al. Trials. 2015 Jun 1;16:243. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0769-z. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26026311 Free PMC article. Review.
Li J, Gao W, Punja S, Ma B, Vohra S, Duan N, Gabler N, Yang K, Kravitz RL. Li J, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.016. Epub 2016 Jan 6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26769257 Review.
Grose E, Wilson S, Barkun J, Bertens K, Martel G, Balaa F, Abou Khalil J. Grose E, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):101-112.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 28. J Am Coll Surg. 2020. PMID: 31672675
Samuel M, Batomen B, Rouette J, Kim J, Platt RW, Brophy JM, Kaufman JS. Samuel M, et al. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e036961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036961. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32847911 Free PMC article.
Sha M, Cao J, Qin CL, Zhang J, Fan C, Li Z, Tong Y, Xia L, Zhang JJ, Xia Q. Sha M, et al. World J Oncol. 2024 Aug;15(4):579-591. doi: 10.14740/wjon1895. Epub 2024 Jul 5. World J Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38993248 Free PMC article.
Izudi J, Tamwesigire IK, Bajunirwe F. Izudi J, et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1447-1454. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0900. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020. PMID: 32783795 Free PMC article.
Liu C, Liu Y, Dong J, Chai Y, Tang H. Liu C, et al. J Int Med Res. 2023 Dec;51(12):3000605231219061. doi: 10.1177/03000605231219061. J Int Med Res. 2023. PMID: 38150553 Free PMC article.
Fetene SM, Mengistu MY, Aschalew AY. Fetene SM, et al. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 13;11:1078462. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078462. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38026288 Free PMC article.
Shi Y, Zhu B, Liang D. Shi Y, et al. Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3069-3079. doi: 10.1111/add.15467. Epub 2021 Apr 22. Addiction. 2021. PMID: 33887075 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3