Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452436 below:

A literature review on communication between picture archiving and communication systems and radiology information systems and/or hospital information systems

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.

Learn more:

|

The purpose of this literature review is to present the concepts surrounding the issue of communication between imaging systems and information systems in radiology and the literature about them. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) were developed to combine viewing of modality images, archiving, and distribution of images. When PACS is integrated/interfaced with radiology information systems (RIS) or hospital information systems (HIS), it can merge patient demographics, medical records, and images. To address several issues surrounding communication between PACS and HIS/RIS and to make interface development easier and faster, various organizations have developed standards for the formatting and transfer of clinical data. Additional work continues to better handle these issues. Communication protocol Health Level 7 (HL7) is a standard application protocol used for electronic text data exchange in health care by most HIS/RIS. The imaging communication protocol for PACS is the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard specification protocol that describes the means of formatting and exchanging images and associated information.

Key words: HL7, DICOM, PACS, radiology information systems, hospital information systems, communication protocol standards, interface

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

• 1.Hori SC. A nontechnical introduction to DICOM. Radiographics. 1997;17:28–28. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.17.5.9308117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2.Cummings BA. RIS integration strengthens PACS. PACS under managed care. Diagn Imaging. 1995;17(suppl 1):13–14. [Google Scholar]
• 3.Wanchoo V. Complete PACS components. Imaging economics. 1997;10(suppl):13–13. [Google Scholar]
• 4.Offenmuller W. Expectations and solutions for HIS/RIS/PACS dataflow and workflow. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10(suppl 1):95–98. doi: 10.1007/BF03168668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Levine B. A Trio of interfaces pilots communication networks. Diagn Imaging Focus on PACS. 1990;12:1–1. [Google Scholar]
• 6.Veader PC: The Missing Links. February 16, 1997; Online: Peter C. Veader: Internet: August 30, 1997. Available: http://www.erols.com/veader/missing.htm.
• 7.Shearer SO, Miller T, Gillen S. Picture archiving and communication system implementation: The practical considerations of adapting the technology to the real world of health care operations. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10(suppl 1):158–160. doi: 10.1007/BF03168685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8.Arreola M, Neiman HL, Sugarman A, et al. Implementation of a radiology electronic imaging network: The community teaching hospital experience. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10(suppl 1):146–149. doi: 10.1007/BF03168682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9.Erickson BJ. Equipment acquisition; What features to look for in a PACS workstation. Diagn Imaging. 1997;19:65–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Gibby WA, Mciff EB. Informatics: Radiology networking fosters quality services. Diagn Imaging. 1997;19:145–159. [Google Scholar]
• 11.Levine BA, Meissner MC, Mun SK: Is adoption of standards enough: Examples of ACR-NEMA interface implementations. 1995. Online: Georgetown University, Department of. Radiology: Internet: October 13, 1997. Available: http:// www.fmac.georgetown.edu.publications/spie95/marione.htm
• 12.Connors J. DICOM’s next obstacle; The information system. Admin Radiol J. 1996;15:41–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13.Otte MT. The future of diagnostic imaging. Applied radiology. 1995;26(suppl):4–8. [Google Scholar]
• 14.Sabatini J. DICOM and HL7 standard communication languages speed reporting. Adv Admin Radiol. 1997;16:44–50. [Google Scholar]
• 15.Kales D. Let’s talk: Integrating clinical devices with information technology. Med Imaging. 1997;12:56–65. [Google Scholar]
• 16.Image Management Special Interest Group (IMSIG): Mission Statement/Goals and Milestones/Work in Progress, February 7, 1997. Online: IMSIG: Internet: January 5, 1998. Available: http://dumccss.mc.duke.edu/standards/HL7/sigs/ imagemanagement/mission.htm
• 17.Cannavo MJ. Taking the risk out of RIS. Med Imaging. 1997;12:69–73. [Google Scholar]
• 18.Healthcare Hewlett Packard: Andover Working Group; The ECF in Brief. Online: Hewlett Packard: Internet: December 8, 1997. Available: http://www.dmo.hp.com/mpginf/ecf.html
• 19.ActiveX for Healthcare: Active X for Healthcare Overview. Online: Hewlett Packard: Internet: February 8, 1998. Available: http://www.mshug.org/activex/intro.htm
• 20.OMG: OMG Background Information: What is CORBA? Internet: OMG: Online: February 18, 1998. Available: http:// www.omg.org/about/wicorba.htm
• 21.Bidgood WD, alSafadi Y, Tucker M, et al. The role of digital imaging and communications in medicine in an Evolving healthcare computing environment: The model is the message. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:1–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03168720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22.Cannavo MJ. Info Systems Mature with Internet Integration. Diagn Imaging. 1997;19(suppl 1):cw3–cw4. [Google Scholar]
• 23.Cooke R. The future of PACS. Imag Econ. 1997;10:17–18. [Google Scholar]
• 24.Mulvaney J: Personal communication, Richmond, VA, April 1998.
• 25.Connors J: Personal communication, Washington, DC, April 1998
• 26.Amos M: Personal communication, Baltimore, MD, May 1998
• 27.Dwyer S: Personal communication, Charlottesville, VA, May 1998

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4