Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-017-0032-9 below:

Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling

1. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).

2. Krey, V., Luderer, G., Clarke, L. & Kriegler, E. Getting from here to there—energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. Climatic Change 123, 369–382 (2014).

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

4. Bruckner, T. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

5. Hertwich, E. G. et al. Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6277–6282 (2015).

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Arvesen, A., Bright, R. M. & Hertwich, E. G. Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energy Policy 39, 7448–7454 (2011).

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Czyrnek-Delêtre, M. M., Chiodi, A., Murphy, J. D. & Gallachóir, B. P. Ó. Impact of including land-use change emissions from biofuels on meeting GHG emissions reduction targets: the example of Ireland. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 18, 1745–1758 (2016).

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Dale, M. & Benson, S. M. Energy balance of the global photovoltaic (PV) industry—is the PV industry a net electricity producer? Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3482–3489 (2013).

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Daly, H. E., Scott, K., Strachan, N. & Barrett, J. Indirect CO₂ emission implications of energy system pathways: Linking IO and TIMES models for the UK. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 10701–10709 (2015).

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Gibon, T. et al. A methodology for integrated, multiregional life cycle assessment scenarios under large-scale technological change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11218–11226 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Arvesen, A. & Hertwich, E. G. Environmental implications of large-scale adoption of wind power: a scenario-based life cycle assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 045102 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Scott, K., Daly, H., Barrett, J. & Strachan, N. National climate policy implications of mitigating embodied energy system emissions. Climatic Change 136, 325–338 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Portugal-Pereira, J. et al. Overlooked impacts of electricity expansion optimisation modelling: The life cycle side of the story. Energy 115(2), 1424–1435 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Masanet, E. et al. Life-cycle assessment of electric power systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 107–136 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Creutzig, F. et al. Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 320–327 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Sathaye, J. et al. in IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate change Mitigation (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).

17. Luderer, G. et al. Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034033 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Luderer, G. et al. Description of the REMIND Model (Version 1.6) (Social Science Research Network, 2015).

19. Arvesen, A., Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Bodirsky, B. L. & Hertwich, E. G. Deriving life cycle assessment coefficients for application in integrated assessment modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 99, 111–125 (2018).

20. Popp, A. et al. Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1095–1098 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Bodirsky, B. L. et al. N₂O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle—current state and future scenarios. Biogeosciences 9, 4169–4197 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Popp, A., Lotze-Campen, H. & Bodirsky, B. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 451–462 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Life Cycle Inventory Database v.2.2 (Ecoinvent, accessed 29 January 2016); http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/older-versions/ecoinvent-version-2/ecoinvent-version-2.html

24. Azar, C., Johansson, D. J. A. & Mattsson, N. Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034004 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Global Mitigation of Non-CO ₂ Greenhouse Gases: 2010-2030 EPA-430-R-13-011 (EPA, 2013).

26. Hertwich, E. G. Addressing biogenic greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9604–9611 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Gernaat, D. E. H. J. et al. Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 33, 142–153 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Searchinger, T. et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319, 1238–1240 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Wise, M. et al. The Implications of Limiting CO ₂ Concentrations for Agriculture, Land Use, Land-use Change Emissions and Bioenergy (US Department of Energy, 2009).

30. Popp, A. et al. The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 034017 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Mäkinen, K. & Khan, S. Policy considerations for greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs. Water Altern. 3, 91–105 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

32. The Common Integrated Assessment Model (CIAM) Documentation (ADVANCE wiki, accessed 20 February 2017); http://themasites.pbl.nl/models/advance/index.php/ADVANCE_wiki

33. Arvizu, D. et al. in IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).

34. Iyer, G. et al. Diffusion of low-carbon technologies and the feasibility of long-term climate targets. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90(A), 103–118 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Demski, C., Spence, A. & Pidgeon, N. Effects of exemplar scenarios on public preferences for energy futures using the my2050 scenario-building tool. Nat. Energy 2, 17027 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. de Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L. & Poortinga, W. Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Anal. 33, 307–317 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Lenzen, M. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 49, 2178–2199 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K. & Hertwich, E. G. Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 13–20 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. van Vuuren, D. P., Weyant, J. & de la Chesnaye, F. Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing. Energy Econ. 28, 102–120 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Strefler, J., Luderer, G., Aboumahboub, T. & Kriegler, E. Economic impacts of alternative greenhouse gas emission metrics: a model-based assessment. Climatic Change. 125, 319–331 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

41. Lucas, P. L., van Vuuren, D. P., Olivier, J. G. J. & den Elzen, M. G. J. Long-term reduction potential of non-CO₂ greenhouse gases. Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 85–103 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3