A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FileAnnotations/Design below:

Extension:FileAnnotations/Design - MediaWiki

This extension lets you add annotations to files. It currently only supports images but can later be used to add annotations to audio and video files too. It is an improvement on the ImageAnnotator gadget and currently has a similar feature set.

Text and photos and videos are great, but today we don't have the same kind of pervasive hyperlinking in media that makes disappearing down a Wikipedia clicking journey both fun and educational. - From T133526

To achieve this FileAnnotations might benefit by being more structured than ImageAnnotator. Commons has guidelines on what kind of annotations are considered good and what format makes sense given a particular context. Encouraging these guidelines through the user interface, and making it easier to do the right thing, while still keeping the contribution process simple is important.

Users and use cases[edit]

Personas are we targeting and what their use cases might be.

Adriana - Active editor What is a good annotation?[edit]

The guidelines on Commons on what makes a good annotation are helpful for users, but we need to find guidelines on what is helpful for the entire system. I feel that in some cases a link to Wikidata item would serve better than a Wikipedia article or a commons category. The way we display the link to the Wikidata item can make us reach closer to our goal too (I am thinking something like Popups and not just a plain link).

Given the current use cases we can roughly divide the types into the following:

Type Source Remarks Do we want it? Image Commons Yes Category Commons Category Will structured meta-data have any affect on this? Yes Thing Wikidata or Wikipedia item While adding we need to show the user only the Wikidata result if there is one. Its easy enough to find out WP entries from there, but not the other way around.

Once a Wikipedia article is added, adding more languages needs to be supported while editing.

Yes External link ? Location Some geo template? This is not for the location of the image (that could already be in the EXIF data) but the location of places in it. Might be helpful in skyline type photos. ? Text This is specifically for transcribing text in images. Not sure if it needs to differ from the Wikitext option. Yes Wikitext We could either have this as a separate type, or have the "[[ ]]" icon for each type and let power users edit the Wikitext of pre-decided types too. Yes, but in what form?

These types need not be explicitly chosen by the editor but can be inferred and then displayed accordingly. The interface however could however encourage links over text.

Possible solutions[edit]

How will a reader find out that there are annotations on a particular file?

Viewing annotations[edit] Encourage Annotating[edit]

How can we encourage annotating files, both readers and editors?

How should the actual annotating process work?

En:Monty Python

Research and User testing[edit]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4