Hello all, Presently, all documentation for the parser tests format is at [1]. I think this is a less than ideal situation. Mostly because I wasted an hour writing what I thought were missing docs. But also because if a person is interested in what the parser tests have to say, they'll have the testdata directory in front of them, and it would make good sense for there to be a README.txt file that explains things right then and there.
Also, the Tree Construction Tests is presented as a very specific format. However, parts of the format are reused in encoding tests. So I think that it might make more sense for there to be a general container format, which simply encodes a list of tests, and then define the semantics of each of the sections on a suite by suite basis. Cheers, Edward [1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Parser_tests --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to html5lib-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4