Done. http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/issues/detail?id=62
Thanks. AM On Feb 8, 6:12 pm, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 8, 2008 3:02 PM, aseem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Sam. > > > I have the patches and tests ready and running. I was wondering as to > > where I could send them out. > > http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/issues/entry > > > Other than the original patch I also > > added the capability to strip entire block-level node trees using the > > same technique as used for the whitelist. I realize that it goes > > against the whitelisting only policy however I felt that for some tags > > (in my patch script and style tags) it might be justified. Also those > > can be overriden quite easily setting the > > HTMLSanitizer.unacceptable_block_elements = []. > > Sounds great! > > -Sam Ruby --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4