On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Ryan King wrote: >> I've put some work in on the ruby port. All tests except for >> sanitizer tests should now pass. The sanitizer fails a lot of tests, >> but I just haven't had time to look into them. Anyone who'd like to >> help out there would be greatly appreciated (even if you can just >> point out what's changed in the test suite, etc.). >> >> I think once the sanitizer tests are cleaned up we could release the >> ruby version. Alternatively if we want to do a release sooner, we >> could release without the sanitizer. > > Looks like all the tests deal with case sensitivity. I've disabled > these tests for the moment, but this will be important for Jacques's > branch of Instiki. > > If nobody beats me to it, I'll circle back around in the next few days > and fix them.
I just checked in a fix for them. It turns out that I added a regression when I put case folding into the tokenizer (turned on by default). By simply turning off lowercasing for these tests, It works fine. Would it be alright if I rolled back your changed and put mine in instead? -ryan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4