James Graham wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: >> Is anybody planning on fixing the bugs that are reported by the >> addition of these tests? > > In general, yes, I am; Hixie has just updated a few things in the parser spec > [1] so there are several things we get wrong at the moment. However, I > haven't > started any work yet so I'm more than happy if others make fixes. > > [1] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=883&to=903 [2]
Let me expand upon the question: having test cases show up without any warning is a bit disconcerting. Can we agree on any way that we can mark tests that we don't (yet) expect to be passing so that they don't get executed until the code is in place to support it? - Sam Ruby --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4