Jacques Distler wrote: > On Jun 11, 3:19 pm, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I see one more mistake >> (should_sanitize_tag_broken_up_by_null) > > The Ruby test suite also had > > should_handle_non_html > should_handle_blank_text > > Dunno whether you want those in the cross-platform tests.
I think that they are still there: $ svn up At revision 714. $ grep -n should_handle_non_html testdata/sanitizer/tests1.dat 213: "name": "should_handle_non_html", $ grep -n should_handle_blank_text testdata/sanitizer/tests1.dat 200: "name": "should_handle_blank_text", What am I missing? - Sam Ruby --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4