On Jun 10, 8:53 pm, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... in fact, the Ruby version has > more sanitize tests, something I plan to backport to the Python version > tomorrow).
Sorry to keep making more work for you, Sam. :-) But there are at least 3 XSS attacks that the Ruby version now protects against, that the Python sanitizer doesn't. And, yes, it has a lot more tests than the Python version. > Oh, and by the way, if other language ports start showing up here (C#, > PHP, Java, whatever), I would help keep these implementations in sync > too. I know that Thomas Broyer would prefer that the implementations be > kept separate, but my feeling is that anything we can do to increase the > size of the development community, the higher the quality of all of the > implementations will be. It would be great to see feature-equivalent implementations in multiple languages (Perl, PHP, Java, ...). I worry, though, that if we don't get some more multilingual developers onboard, the work for you, Sam, will scale like O(N^2). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4