> Tim, mind if I add you as a member (committer) to this project? You > certainly have earned it!
Sure, thanks. > Note: while there is some obvious benefits to keeping the high level > design of the two implementations in sync, I have no interest in drawing > attention to language differences. If there are obvious Ruby idioms > that can make a given section of code smaller or clearer, then by all > means, such idioms should be used. Yes, there are parts that could be made more Rubyish. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to html5lib-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4