Given that 𝒜 and ℬ are categories, a functor F : 𝒜 → ℬ is a pair of mappings ( F o b j e c t s : O b ( 𝒜 ) → O b ( ℬ ) , F a r r o w s : A r ( 𝒜 ) → A r ( ℬ ) ) (the subscripts are generally omitted in practice).
AxiomsThese operations will be important in the definition of a monad.
The category CatThe existence of identity and composition functors implies that, for any well-defined collection of categories E , there exists a category C a t E whose arrows are all functors between categories in E . Since no category can include itself as an object, there can be no category of all categories, but it is common and useful to designate a category small when the collection of objects is a set, and define Cat to be the category whose objects are all small categories and whose arrows are all functors on small categories.
Functors in HaskellProperly speaking, a functor in the category Haskell is a pair of a set-theoretic function on Haskell types and a set-theoretic function on Haskell functions satisfying the axioms. However, Haskell being a functional language, Haskellers are only interested in functors where both the object and arrow mappings can be defined and named in Haskell; this effectively restricts them to functors where the object map is a Haskell data constructor and the arrow map is a polymorphic function, the same constraints imposed by the class Functor:
class Functor f where fmap :: (a -> b) -> (f a -> f b)External links
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4