Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://webassembly.github.io/spec/web-api/index.html below:

WebAssembly Web API

[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
partial namespace WebAssembly {
  Promise<Module> compileStreaming(Promise<Response> source);
  Promise<WebAssemblyInstantiatedSource> instantiateStreaming(
      Promise<Response> source, optional object importObject);
};

To

with a promise of a

, perform the following steps:

Note: This algorithm accepts a Response object, or a promise for one, and compiles and instantiates the resulting bytes of the response. This compilation can be performed in the background and in a streaming manner. If the Response is not CORS-same-origin, does not represent an ok status, or does not match the `application/wasm` MIME type, the returned promise will be rejected with a TypeError; if compilation or instantiation fails, the returned promise will be rejected with a CompileError or other relevant error type, depending on the cause of failure.

1. Let returnValue be a new promise

2. Upon fulfillment of source with value unwrappedSource:

   1. Let response be unwrappedSource’s response.

   2. Let mimeType be the result of getting `Content-Type` from response’s header list.

   3. If mimeType is null, reject returnValue with a TypeError and abort these substeps.

   4. Remove all HTTP tab or space byte from the start and end of mimeType.

   5. If mimeType is not a byte-case-insensitive match for `application/wasm`, reject returnValue with a TypeError and abort these substeps.

      Note: extra parameters are not allowed, including the empty `application/wasm;`.

   6. If response is not CORS-same-origin, reject returnValue with a TypeError and abort these substeps.

   7. If response’s status is not an ok status, reject returnValue with a TypeError and abort these substeps.

   8. Consume response’s body as an ArrayBuffer, and let bodyPromise be the result.

      Note: Although it is specified here that the response is consumed entirely before compilation proceeds, that is purely for ease of specification; implementations are likely to instead perform processing in a streaming fashion. The difference is unobservable, and thus the simpler model is specified.

   9. Upon fulfillment of bodyPromise with value bodyArrayBuffer:

      1. Let stableBytes be a copy of the bytes held by the buffer bodyArrayBuffer.

      2. Asynchronously compile the WebAssembly module stableBytes using the networking task source and resolve returnValue with the result.

   10. Upon rejection of bodyPromise with reason reason:

       1. Reject returnValue with reason.

3. Upon rejection of source with reason reason:

   1. Reject returnValue with reason.

4. Return returnValue.

Web user agents must augment the Module interface with the [Serializable] extended attribute.

The serialization steps, given value, serialized, and forStorage, are:

1. If forStorage is true, throw a "DataCloneError" DOMException.

2. Set serialized.[[Bytes]] to the sub-serialization of value.[[Bytes]].

3. Set serialized.[[AgentCluster]] to the current Realm’s corresponding agent cluster.

The deserialization steps, given serialized, value, and targetRealm are:

1. Let bytes be the sub-deserialization of serialized.[[Bytes]].

2. Set value.[[Bytes]] to bytes.

3. If targetRealm’s corresponding agent cluster is not serialized.[[AgentCluster]], then throw a "DataCloneError" DOMException.

4. Compile a WebAssembly module from bytes and set value.[[Module]] to the result.

Engines should attempt to share/reuse internal compiled code when performing a structured serialization, although in corner cases like CPU upgrade or browser update, this might not be possible and full recompilation may be necessary.

Note: The semantics of a structured serialization is as-if the binary source, from which the Module was compiled, is serialized, then deserialized, and recompiled into the target realm. Given the above engine optimizations, structured serialization provides developers explicit control over both compiled-code caching and cross-window/worker code sharing.

This section is non-normative.

Browsers, JavaScript engines, and offline tools have common ways of referring to JavaScript artifacts and language constructs. For example, locations in JavaScript source code are printed in stack traces or error messages, and are represented naturally as decimal-format lines and columns in text files. Names of functions and variables are taken directly from the sources. Therefore (for example) even though the exact format of implementation-dependent stack trace strings does not always match, the locations are easily understandable and the same across browsers.

To achieve the same goal of a common representation for WebAssembly constructs, the following conventions are adopted.

A WebAssembly location is a reference to a particular instruction in the binary, and may be displayed by a browser or engine in similar contexts as JavaScript source locations. It has the following format:

${url}:wasm-function[${funcIndex}]:${pcOffset}

Where

• ${url} is the URL associated with the module, if applicable (see notes).

• ${funcIndex} is the function index relative to the module.

• ${pcOffset} is the offset in the module binary of the first byte of the instruction, printed in hexadecimal with lower-case digits, with a leading 0x prefix.

Notes:

• The URL field may be interpreted differently depending on the context. When the response-based instantiation API is used in a browser, the associated URL should be used; or when the ArrayBuffer-based instantiation API is used, the browser should represent the location of the API call. This kind of instantiation is analogous to executing JavaScript using eval; therefore if the browser has an existing method to represent the location of the eval call it can use a similar one for WebAssembly.instantiate. For example if the browser uses foo.js line 10 > eval or eval at bar (foo.js:10:3) for eval, it could use foo.js line 10 > WebAssembly.instantiate or WebAssembly.instantiate at bar (foo.js:10:3), respectively. Offline tools may use a filename instead.

• Using hexadecimal for module offsets matches common conventions in native tools such as objdump (where addresses are printed in hex) and makes them visually distinct from JavaScript line numbers. Other numbers are represented in decimal.

While the "name" property of an Exported Function instance is specified by the JS API, synthesized function names are also displayed in other contexts like call stacks in debuggers and string representations of stack traces. If a WebAssembly module contains a name section, these names should be used to synthesize a function name as follows:

• If a function name subsection is present, the displayed name should be ${module_name}.${function_name} or ${function_name}, depending on whether the module name is present.

• Otherwise, the output can be context-dependent:

  • If the function name is shown alongside its location in a stack trace, then just the module name (if present) or an empty string can be used (because the function index is already in the location).

  • Otherwise, ${module_name}.wasm-function[${funcIndex}] or wasm-function[${funcIndex}] should be used to convey the function index.

Note that this document does not specify the full format of strings such as stack frame representations; this allows engines to continue using their existing formats for JavaScript (which existing code may already be depending on) while still printing WebAssembly frames in a format consistent with JavaScript.

The media type application/wasm has been registered with the IANA media type database [IANA-MEDIA-TYPES], with the following registration template:

application/wasm

Type Name:

application

Subtype Name:

wasm

Required Parameters:

None

Optional Parameters:

None

Encoding Considerations:

binary

Security Considerations:

WebAssembly is a standard, a safe, portable, low-level code format. The security considerations associated with executing WebAssembly code are described in https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core/#security-considerations.

The WebAssembly format includes no integrity or privacy protection. If such protection is needed it must be provided externally, e.g., through the use of HTTPS.

Interoperability Considerations:

See WebAssembly Core Conformance
https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core/#conformance

Published specification:

https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core-1/ https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-js-api-1/ https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-web-api-1/

Application Usage:

The application/wasm media type is intended for use as the type used to describe WebAssembly files when sent over HTTP to be executed by browsers, which is a common scenario. Additionally, the type is used by several WebAssembly runtimes that take advantage of the safety and portability while targeting efficient execution and compact representation.

Fragment Identifier Considerations:

None

Restrictions on usage:

None

Provisional Registrations:

N/A

Additional information:

Deprecated alias names for this type:

None

Magic number(s):

0x00 0x61 0x73 0x6D

File extension(s):

.wasm

Macintosh file type code(s):

None

Object Identifier(s) or OID(s):

None

Intended usage:

Common

Other Information & Comments:

Common

Contact Person:

Contact Name:

Eric Prud’hommeaux

Contact Email Address:

eric@w3.org

Author/Change Controller:

W3C

This section is non-normative.

WebAssembly is an additional program execution mechanism, and can be executed wherever JavaScript can be executed. Therefore the threat model is essentially the same as for JavaScript code, and has similar considerations for delivery (e.g. WebAssembly code should be protected in transit from active and passive network attackers) and policy (e.g. some loading mechanisms or execution are restricted via mechanisms such as the same-origin policy or Content Security Policy).

This section is non-normative.

Since the original release 1.0 of the WebAssembly specification, a number of proposals for extensions have been integrated. The following sections provide an overview of what has changed.

Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]

Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example” or are set apart from the normative text with class="example", like this:

This is an example of an informative example.

Informative notes begin with the word “Note” and are set apart from the normative text with class="note", like this:

Note, this is an informative note.

Requirements phrased in the imperative as part of algorithms (such as "strip any leading space characters" or "return false and abort these steps") are to be interpreted with the meaning of the key word ("must", "should", "may", etc) used in introducing the algorithm.

Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps can be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. In particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to be easy to understand and are not intended to be performant. Implementers are encouraged to optimize.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3