Information is displayed in sorted order to enable users to easily find the items they are looking for. However, users of different languages might have very different expectations of what a “sorted” list should look like. Not only does the alphabetical order vary from one language to another, but it also can vary from document to document within the same language. For example, phonebook ordering might be different than dictionary ordering. String comparison is one of the basic functions most applications require, and yet implementations often do not match local conventions. The ICU Collation Service provides string comparison capability with support for appropriate sort orderings for each of the locales you need. In the event that you have a very unusual requirement, you are also provided the facilities to customize orderings.
Starting in release 1.8, the ICU Collation Service is compliant to the Unicode Collation Algorithm (UCA) (Unicode Technical Standard #10) and based on the Default Unicode Collation Element Table (DUCET) which defines the same sort order as ISO 14651.
The ICU Collation Service also contains several enhancements that are not available in UCA. These have been adopted into the CLDR Collation Algorithm. For example:
In other words, ICU implements the CLDR Collation Algorithm which is an extension of the Unicode Collation Algorithm (UCA) which is an extension of ISO 14651.
There are several benefits to using the collation algorithms defined in these standards, including:
The algorithms have been designed and reviewed by experts in multilingual collation, and therefore are robust and comprehensive.
Applications that share sorted data but do not agree on how the data should be ordered fail to perform correctly. By conforming to the CLDR/UCA/14651 standards for collation and using CLDR language-specific collation data, independently developed applications sort data identically and perform properly.
In addition, Unicode contains a large set of characters. This can make it difficult for collation to be a fast operation or require collation to use significant memory or disk resources. The ICU collation implementation is designed to be fast, have a small memory footprint and be highly customizable.
There are many challenges when accommodating the world’s languages and writing systems and the different orderings that are used. However, the ICU Collation Service provides an excellent means for comparing strings in a locale-sensitive fashion.
For example, here are some of the ways languages vary in ordering strings:
The letters A-Z can be sorted in a different order than in English. For example, in Lithuanian, “y” is sorted between “i” and “k”.
Combinations of letters can be treated as if they were one letter. For example, in traditional Spanish “ch” is treated as a single letter, and sorted between “c” and “d”.
Accented letters can be treated as minor variants of the unaccented letter. For example, “é” can be treated equivalent to “e”.
Accented letters can be treated as distinct letters. For example, “Å” in Danish is treated as a separate letter that sorts just after “Z”.
Unaccented letters that are considered distinct in one language can be indistinct in another. For example, the letters “v” and “w” are two different letters according to English. However, “v” and “w” are traditionally considered variant forms of the same letter in Swedish.
A letter can be treated as if it were two letters. For example, in German phonebook (or “lists of names”) order “ä” is compared as if it were “ae”.
Thai requires that the order of certain letters be reversed.
Some French dictionary ordering traditions sort accents in backwards order, from the end of the string. For example, the word “côte” sorts before “coté” because the acute accent on the final “e” is more significant than the circumflex on the “o”.
Sometimes lowercase letters sort before uppercase letters. The reverse is required in other situations. For example, lowercase letters are usually sorted before uppercase letters in English. Danish letters are the exact opposite.
Even in the same language, different applications might require different sorting orders. For example, in German dictionaries, “öf” would come before “of”. In phone books the situation is the exact opposite.
Sorting orders can change over time due to government regulations or new characters/scripts in Unicode.
To accommodate the many languages and differing requirements, ICU collation supports customizing sort orderings - also known as tailoring. More details regarding tailoring are discussed in the Customization chapter.
The basic ICU Collation Service is provided by two main categories of APIs:
String comparison - most commonly used: APIs return result of comparing two strings (greater than, equal or less than). This is used as a comparator when sorting lists, building tree maps, etc.
Sort key generation - used when a very large set of strings are compared/sorted repeatedly: APIs return a zero-terminated array of bytes per string known as a sort key. The keys can be compared directly using strcmp or memcmp standard library functions, saving repeated lookup and computation of each string’s collation properties. For example, database applications use index tables of sort keys to index strings quickly. Note, however, that this only improves performance for large numbers of strings because sorting via the comparison functions is very fast. For more information, see Sortkeys vs Comparison.
ICU provides an AlphabeticIndex API for generating language-appropriate sorted-section labels like in dictionaries and phone books.
ICU also provides a higher-level string search API which can be used, for example, for case-insensitive or accent-insensitive search in an editor or in a web page. ICU string search is based on the low-level collation element iteration.
Programming ExamplesHere are some API usage conventions for the ICU Collation Service APIs.
Table of contentsRetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4