This example illustrates the use of DA scorer such as TargetAccuracyScorer with cross_val_score.
We first create a shifted dataset. Then we prepare the pipeline including a base estimator doing the classification and the DA estimator. We use ShuffleSplit as cross-validation strategy.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from sklearn.model_selection import ShuffleSplit, cross_val_score
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from skada import EntropicOTMapping, make_da_pipeline, source_target_split
from skada.datasets import make_shifted_datasets
from skada.metrics import SupervisedScorer
RANDOM_SEED = 0
dataset = make_shifted_datasets(
n_samples_source=30,
n_samples_target=20,
shift="concept_drift",
label="binary",
noise=0.4,
random_state=RANDOM_SEED,
return_dataset=True,
)
base_estimator = SVC()
estimator = EntropicOTMapping(base_estimator=base_estimator, reg_e=0.5, tol=1e-3)
X, y, sample_domain = dataset.pack_train(as_sources=["s"], as_targets=["t"])
X_source, X_target, y_source, y_target = source_target_split(
X, y, sample_domain=sample_domain
)
cv = ShuffleSplit(n_splits=5, test_size=0.3, random_state=RANDOM_SEED)
The DA estimator pipeline is ready to be used with cross_val_score. Source data from the training splits is first adapted with the target data from the same splits and then used to fit the base estimator. The target data from the test split is used to compute the score. The separation between source and target data is done automatically by the DA pipeline thanks to sample_domain. The target_labels are only used by the SupervisedScorer.
_, target_labels, _ = dataset.pack(as_sources=["s"], as_targets=["t"], train=False)
scores_sup = cross_val_score(
estimator,
X,
y,
cv=cv,
params={"sample_domain": sample_domain, "target_labels": target_labels},
scoring=SupervisedScorer(),
)
print(
"Cross-validation score with supervised DA: "
f"{np.mean(scores_sup):.2f} (+/- {np.std(scores_sup):.2f})"
)
Cross-validation score with supervised DA: 0.98 (+/- 0.01)
To evaluate the performance of the DA estimator, we compare it with the performance of the base estimator without DA. We use the same cross-validation strategy and the same data splits. We create a DA pipeline with make_da_pipeline including the base estimator only. The sample_domain and target_labels are also passed to the pipeline to separate the source and target data and to compute the score.
Cross-validation score without DA: 0.58 (+/- 0.04)
plt.figure(figsize=(6, 4))
plt.barh(
[0, 1],
[np.mean(scores_sup), np.mean(scores_no_da)],
yerr=[np.std(scores_sup), np.std(scores_no_da)],
)
plt.yticks([0, 1], ["DA", "No DA"])
plt.xlabel("Accuracy")
plt.axvline(0.5, color="k", linestyle="--", label="Random guess")
plt.legend()
plt.show()
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 0.259 seconds)
Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4