Comparative Study
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199901000-00012. Delay in diagnosis of breast cancerAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Delay in diagnosis of breast cancerP I Tartter et al. Ann Surg. 1999 Jan.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199901000-00012. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjectives: To assess the consequences of physician delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer by comparing stage, treatment, and outcome of patients with and without delay, and to identify patient characteristics that may make diagnosis more difficult. SUMMARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Delay in diagnosis of breast cancer is the most common clinical scenario resulting in malpractice litigation.
Methods: The records of 1014 patients were reviewed and the events preceding the diagnosis were reconstructed. Accurate assessment of the physician delay in diagnosis could be made for 606 patients, 51 (8%) with physician delay >3 months. Patients with delay were comparable to patients without delay in terms of age, height, weight, age at menarche, pregnancies, children, proportion in menopause, age at menopause, and family history of breast cancer.
Results: Thirty-six percent of patients who had a delay in diagnosis had normal mammograms versus 7% of patients without delay. Cancers in patients with delay were significantly larger on average than in those without delay, but there were no significant differences in pathology, differentiation, nodal status, TNM stage, treatment, or outcome.
Conclusions: Physician delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer is common, and patients with delay are similar to patients without delay, although they are more likely to have normal mammograms. The consequences of physician delay in terms of stage at diagnosis, treatment, and outcome were not statistically significant.
Similar articlesReuter KL, Baker SP, Krolikowski FJ. Reuter KL, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Feb;158(2):273-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.2.1729780. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992. PMID: 1729780
Mitnick JS, Vazquez MF, Plesser KP, Roses DF. Mitnick JS, et al. Radiology. 1993 Dec;189(3):673-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234689. Radiology. 1993. PMID: 8234689
Kern KA. Kern KA. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):542-6; discussion 546-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050062008. Arch Surg. 1992. PMID: 1575624
Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D, Bonardi R, Collini G, Del Turco MR. Ciatto S, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Sep;105(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9425-3. Epub 2006 Nov 18. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007. PMID: 17115112
Onitilo AA, Liang H, Stankowski RV, Engel JM, Broton M, Doi SA, Miskowiak DA. Onitilo AA, et al. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2738. Epub 2014 Jul 14. Rural Remote Health. 2014. PMID: 25018129
Fayanju OM, Jeffe DB, Elmore L, Ksiazek DN, Margenthaler JA. Fayanju OM, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;20(3):723-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2558-1. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23070783 Free PMC article.
Soh JY, Yahya MM, Bachok N, Wan Zain WZ, Wong MP, Zakaria Z, Hashim Isa Merican SR, Md Hashim MN, Wan Mokhter WM, Ramely R, Zakaria AD, Mohamad IS. Soh JY, et al. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01898-5. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35897099 Free PMC article.
Chou CP, Lin HS. Chou CP, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jul 28;13:5899-5906. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S314282. eCollection 2021. Cancer Manag Res. 2021. PMID: 34349563 Free PMC article.
Weingart SN, Saadeh MG, Simchowitz B, Gandhi TK, Nekhlyudov L, Studdert DM, Puopolo AL, Shulman LN. Weingart SN, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):702-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0982-0. Epub 2009 Apr 23. J Gen Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19387748 Free PMC article.
Neal RD, Allgar VL. Neal RD, et al. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jun 6;92(11):1971-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602623. Br J Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15900296 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3