Comparative Study
. 1998 Oct;88(10):1484-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1484. Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview SurveyAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview SurveyB L Wells et al. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct.
. 1998 Oct;88(10):1484-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1484. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjectives: This study tested the utility of ecological variables created from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for strategic targeting of health services for the underserved.
Methods: Ecological variables were created using the 1989-1991 survey years of the NHIS public use data files. Segments, the NHIS secondary sampling units, permit computation of secondary sampling characteristics by percentage Black, percentage Hispanic, percentage below poverty, percentage unemployed, median education, median income, median age, and percentage residing in the United States for 5 years or less. These variables were analyzed with the NHIS Health Promotion and Disease Prevention 1990 supplement reporting mammogram, clinical breast examination, and Pap test use.
Results: Median education of areas was inversely related to never having mammograms. Areas with a high proportion (70%-100%) of Hispanic respondents also were more likely not to have mammograms. Women residing in areas with moderate or high proportions of Hispanic respondents were more likely never to have clinical breast examinations and Pap tests, as were those in areas with low income, poverty, and respondents who had resided in the United States 5 years or less.
Conclusions: The new methodology of constructing ecological variables using the NHIS demonstrates an application that may help identify underserved areas or areas with underutilized services. More studies using this methodology are warranted.
Comment inFeinleib M. Feinleib M. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1445-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1445. Am J Public Health. 1998. PMID: 9772841 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Coughlin SS, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):260-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19. Soc Sci Med. 2008. PMID: 18022299
Yancey AK, Walden L. Yancey AK, et al. J Cancer Educ. 1994;9(1):46-52. doi: 10.1080/08858199409528265. J Cancer Educ. 1994. PMID: 8204458 Review.
Zavertnik JJ. Zavertnik JJ. Cancer. 1993 Aug 1;72(3 Suppl):1088-92. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3+<1088::aid-cncr2820721325>3.0.co;2-0. Cancer. 1993. PMID: 8334663 Review.
Pruitt SL, Shim MJ, Mullen PD, Vernon SW, Amick BC 3rd. Pruitt SL, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct;18(10):2579-99. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009. PMID: 19815634 Free PMC article. Review.
Zenk SN, Tarlov E, Sun J. Zenk SN, et al. J Urban Health. 2006 Mar;83(2):195-210. doi: 10.1007/s11524-005-9023-4. J Urban Health. 2006. PMID: 16736369 Free PMC article.
Boardman JD, Saint Onge JM, Rogers RG, Denney JT. Boardman JD, et al. J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Sep;46(3):229-43. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600302. J Health Soc Behav. 2005. PMID: 16259146 Free PMC article.
Glazier RH, Creatore MI, Cortinois AA, Agha MM, Moineddin R. Glazier RH, et al. Can J Public Health. 2004 May-Jun;95(3):I30-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03403663. Can J Public Health. 2004. PMID: 15191130 Free PMC article.
Manjer J, Berglund G, Bondesson L, Garne JP, Janzon L, Lindgren A, Malina J, Matson S. Manjer J, et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Apr;54(4):279-85. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.4.279. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000. PMID: 10827910 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3