A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36162041/ below:

Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update

Review

doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00217. Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update Sarah Temin  2 Maribel Almonte  3 Partha Basu  3 Nicole G Campos  4 Patty E Gravitt  5 Vandana Gupta  6 Dorothy C Lombe  7 Rául Murillo  8 Carolyn Nakisige  9 Gina Ogilvie  10 Leeya F Pinder  11 Usha R Poli  12 Youlin Qiao  13 Yin Ling Woo  14 Jose Jeronimo  5

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Review

Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update

Surendra S Shastri et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Sep.

doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00217. Authors Surendra S Shastri  1 Sarah Temin  2 Maribel Almonte  3 Partha Basu  3 Nicole G Campos  4 Patty E Gravitt  5 Vandana Gupta  6 Dorothy C Lombe  7 Rául Murillo  8 Carolyn Nakisige  9 Gina Ogilvie  10 Leeya F Pinder  11 Usha R Poli  12 Youlin Qiao  13 Yin Ling Woo  14 Jose Jeronimo  5 Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Purpose: To update resource-stratified, evidence-based recommendations on secondary prevention of cervical cancer globally.

Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel to produce recommendations reflecting four resource-tiered settings. A review of existing guidelines, formal consensus-based process, and modified ADAPTE process to adapt existing guidelines was conducted. Other experts participated in formal consensus.

Results: This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Five existing guidelines were identified and reviewed, and adapted recommendations form the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness analyses provided indirect evidence to inform consensus, which resulted in ≥ 75% agreement.

Recommendations: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is recommended in all resource settings; visual inspection with acetic acid may be used in basic settings. Recommended age ranges and frequencies vary by the following setting: maximal: age 25-65 years, every 5 years; enhanced: age 30-65 years, if two consecutive negative tests at 5-year intervals, then every 10 years; limited: age 30-49 years, every 10 years; basic: age 30-49 years, one to three times per lifetime. For basic settings, visual assessment is used to determine treatment eligibility; in other settings, genotyping with cytology or cytology alone is used to determine treatment. For basic settings, treatment is recommended if abnormal triage results are obtained; in other settings, abnormal triage results followed by colposcopy is recommended. For basic settings, treatment options are thermal ablation or loop electrosurgical excision procedure; for other settings, loop electrosurgical excision procedure or ablation is recommended; with a 12-month follow-up in all settings. Women who are HIV-positive should be screened with HPV testing after diagnosis, twice as many times per lifetime as the general population. Screening is recommended at 6 weeks postpartum in basic settings; in other settings, screening is recommended at 6 months. In basic settings without mass screening, infrastructure for HPV testing, diagnosis, and treatment should be developed.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/resource-stratified-guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Surendra S. Shastri This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Patty E. Gravitt Research Funding: Cepheid (Inst) Dorothy C. Lombe This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Yin Ling Woo Honoraria: Roche India Research Funding: COPAN (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1

Use of VIA versus use…

FIG 1

Use of VIA versus use of VAT. VAT, visual assessment for treatment; VIA,…

FIG 1

Use of VIA versus use of VAT. VAT, visual assessment for treatment; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.

FIG 2

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer…

FIG 2

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-49 in basic‐resource settings. HPV,…

FIG 2

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-49 in basic‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; VAT, visual assessment for treatment; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.

FIG 3

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer…

FIG 3

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-49 in limited‐resource settings. HPV,…

FIG 3

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-49 in limited‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.

FIG 4

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer…

FIG 4

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-65 in enhanced‐resource settings. HPV,…

FIG 4

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-65 in enhanced‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; QA, quality assurance.

FIG 5

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer…

FIG 5

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-65 in maximal‐resource settings. HPV,…

FIG 5

Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-65 in maximal‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; QA, quality assurance.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. McDaniel CC, Hallam HH, Cadwallader T, et al. : Persistent racial disparities in cervical cancer screening with Pap test. Prev Med Rep 24:101652, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agenor M, Perez AE, Peitzmeier SM, et al. : Human papillomavirus vaccination initiation among sexual orientation identity and racial/ethnic subgroups of Black and White U.S. women and girls: An intersectional analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 27:1349-1358, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oladeru OT, Ma SJ, Miccio JA, et al. : Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities in transgender people. Am J Clin Oncol 45:116-121, 2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peitzmeier SM, Bernstein IM, McDowell MJ, et al. : Enacting power and constructing gender in cervical cancer screening encounters between transmasculine patients and health care providers. Cult Health Sex 22:1315-1332, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. James SE, Herman JL, Rankin S: The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC, National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3