Review
. 2022 Jun;101(6):597-607. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14359. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Human papillomavirus vaccination in women undergoing excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and subsequent risk of recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysisAffiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Review
Human papillomavirus vaccination in women undergoing excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and subsequent risk of recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysisDina Overgaard Eriksen et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jun.
. 2022 Jun;101(6):597-607. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14359. Epub 2022 Apr 26. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractIntroduction: In this review and meta-analysis we aimed to investigate whether human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination administered after excisional treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is associated with a reduced risk of recurrence of CIN grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).
Material and methods: We performed a systematic literature search in three online databases through June 2021. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion if the prophylactic HPV vaccine was administered after excisional treatment for histologically verified CIN. Only English language literature was included. The primary outcome measure was recurrence of CIN2+ after treatment. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed and random-effects models, and results were reported as pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Quality assessment was performed using ROB2-tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for observational studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021238257).
Results: A total of 1561 studies were identified, of which nine, including 19 971 women, were included. Two studies were RCTs and seven were observational studies. Using the fixed-effect model on the two RCTs, the OR for recurrence of CIN2+ was 0.29 (95% CI 0.16-0.53). Due to considerable heterogeneity in observational studies, the random-effects model was used to estimate pooled OR for CIN2+ recurrence in these studies. Thus, using unadjusted data from observational studies, the OR for CIN2+ recurrence was 0.35 (95% CI 0.18-0.67), whereas when using adjusted data, the OR for CIN2+ recurrence was 0.54 (95% CI 0.21-1.35). However, quality assessment revealed a serious risk of bias for the majority of the studies included.
Conclusions: HPV vaccination post-treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CIN2+ recurrence when using unadjusted estimates from observational studies and RCTs. We found no significant effect of HPV vaccination on risk of CIN2+ recurrence when using the outcome measure from observational studies with the least risk of bias. Large, well-designed randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to determine whether post-treatment HPV vaccination should be recommended to all women undergoing excisional treatment for CIN.
Keywords: HPV vaccination; cervical cancer prevention; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; conization; excisional treatment.
© 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Conflict of interest statementPJ and AH have received a speaker's fee from Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. AH has received reagents at reduced cost from Roche, Denmark, outside the submitted work. DOE and JBS declare no potential conflict of interest.
FiguresFIGURE 1
PRISMA flowchart summarizing the inclusion…
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flowchart summarizing the inclusion of papers
FIGURE 1PRISMA flowchart summarizing the inclusion of papers
FIGURE 2
Forest plot of randomized controlled…
FIGURE 2
Forest plot of randomized controlled trials using the fixed‐effect model. The figure summarizes…
FIGURE 2Forest plot of randomized controlled trials using the fixed‐effect model. The figure summarizes odds ratios (OR) of recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) comparing women receiving the HPV vaccine after excisional treatment with women who did not receive the vaccine
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of observational studies…
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of observational studies using the random‐effects model on crude estimates (A)…
FIGURE 3Forest plot of observational studies using the random‐effects model on crude estimates (A) and adjusted estimates (B). The figure summarizes odds ratios (OR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) comparing women receiving the HPV vaccine after excisional treatment with women who did not receive the vaccine
FIGURE 4
Forest plot of observational studies…
FIGURE 4
Forest plot of observational studies using the fixed‐effect model on crude estimates (A)…
FIGURE 4Forest plot of observational studies using the fixed‐effect model on crude estimates (A) and adjusted estimates (B). The figure summarizes odds ratios (OR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) comparing women receiving the HPV vaccine after excisional treatment with women who did not receive the vaccine
Similar articlesPetráš M, Dvořák V, Lomozová D, Máčalík R, Neradová S, Dlouhý P, Malinová J, Rosina J, Lesná IK. Petráš M, et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2023 Dec;99(8):561-570. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2023-055793. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Sex Transm Infect. 2023. PMID: 37553234 Free PMC article.
Kechagias KS, Kalliala I, Bowden SJ, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, Paraskevaidis E, Dillner J, Nieminen P, Strander B, Sasieni P, Veroniki AA, Kyrgiou M. Kechagias KS, et al. BMJ. 2022 Aug 3;378:e070135. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070135. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35922074 Free PMC article.
Arbyn M, Xu L, Simoens C, Martin-Hirsch PP. Arbyn M, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29740819 Free PMC article. Review.
Chen M, Li C, Cui Q, Zhou C, Chen P, Yao S. Chen M, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jul;286:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 Apr 19. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023. PMID: 37159990
Jentschke M, Kampers J, Becker J, Sibbertsen P, Hillemanns P. Jentschke M, et al. Vaccine. 2020 Sep 22;38(41):6402-6409. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.055. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 32762871 Review.
Shen XL, Li ZY, Li Q, Wang K. Shen XL, et al. Int J Womens Health. 2024 Jul 29;16:1285-1291. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S468086. eCollection 2024. Int J Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39100108 Free PMC article.
González-Rodríguez JC, Cruz-Valdez A, Madrid-Marina V. González-Rodríguez JC, et al. Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 23;14:1386167. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386167. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38715779 Free PMC article. Review.
Pergialiotis V, Rodolakis I, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Pergialiotis V, et al. J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 6;14(6):606. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060606. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38929827 Free PMC article. Review.
Valasoulis G, Michail G, Pouliakis A, Androutsopoulos G, Panayiotides IG, Kyrgiou M, Daponte A, Paraskevaidis E. Valasoulis G, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 20;14(14):3530. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143530. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35884589 Free PMC article.
Petráš M, Dvořák V, Lomozová D, Máčalík R, Neradová S, Dlouhý P, Malinová J, Rosina J, Lesná IK. Petráš M, et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2023 Dec;99(8):561-570. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2023-055793. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Sex Transm Infect. 2023. PMID: 37553234 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3