Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Fully 3D-printed soft robots with integrated fluidic circuitryJoshua D Hubbard et al. Sci Adv. 2021.
. 2021 Jul 14;7(29):eabe5257. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5257. Print 2021 Jul. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractThe emergence of soft robots has presented new challenges associated with controlling the underlying fluidics of such systems. Here, we introduce a strategy for additively manufacturing unified soft robots comprising fully integrated fluidic circuitry in a single print run via PolyJet three-dimensional (3D) printing. We explore the efficacy of this approach for soft robots designed to leverage novel 3D fluidic circuit elements-e.g., fluidic diodes, "normally closed" transistors, and "normally open" transistors with geometrically tunable pressure-gain functionalities-to operate in response to fluidic analogs of conventional electronic signals, including constant-flow ["direct current (DC)"], "alternating current (AC)"-inspired, and preprogrammed aperiodic ("variable current") input conditions. By enabling fully integrated soft robotic entities (composed of soft actuators, fluidic circuitry, and body features) to be rapidly disseminated, modified on demand, and 3D-printed in a single run, the presented design and additive manufacturing strategy offers unique promise to catalyze new classes of soft robots.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
FiguresFig. 1. Design and additive manufacturing strategy…
Fig. 1. Design and additive manufacturing strategy for PolyJet 3D printing unified soft robotic systems…
Fig. 1. Design and additive manufacturing strategy for PolyJet 3D printing unified soft robotic systems comprising fully integrated fluidic circuitry in a single print run.(A) Modular 3D CAD models and analogous electronic circuit symbols of fluidic circuit elements, fluidic interconnects, soft actuators, and structural casing. (B) CAD model and corresponding analogous circuit diagram of a unified soft robot with a fully integrated fluidic oscillator circuit. (C) Conceptual illustration of multimaterial PolyJet 3D printing the soft robot using compliant (black), rigid (white), and water-soluble support (yellow) materials. (D) Sequential time-lapse images of the PolyJet 3D printing process. Scale bar, 5 cm; see also movie S1. (E and F) Fabrication results for the unified multimaterial soft robot with integrated fluidic circuitry (E) before and (F) after support material removal. Scale bars, 2 cm. Photo credits: Ruben Acevedo, University of Maryland College Park.
Fig. 2. Operating principles and results for…
Fig. 2. Operating principles and results for PolyJet 3D printing–based fluidic circuit elements comprising integrated…
Fig. 2. Operating principles and results for PolyJet 3D printing–based fluidic circuit elements comprising integrated compliant (black) and rigid (white) materials.(A to C) Conceptual illustrations of the (A) architecture, (B) “forward flow” state, and (C) “reverse flow” state for the fluidic diode. (D) Experimental results for directional fluid flow versus pressure for the fluidic diode. (E to H) Conceptual illustrations of the (E) architecture, (F) “closed” state [induced by a source pressure (PS) input], (G) “open” state [facilitated by a gate pressure (PG) input of sufficient magnitude], and (H) “reclosed” state (caused by a high PG input) for the normally closed fluidic transistor. The reclosed state dynamics can be adjusted by tuning the post height (HP). (I to K) Experimental results for source-to-drain fluid flow (QSD) versus PG corresponding to distinct, constant PS inputs for normally closed fluidic transistors designed with HP = (I) 0 μm, (J) 250 μm, and (K) 500 μm. (L to N) Conceptual illustrations of the (L) architecture, (M) open state, and (N) closed state (facilitated by a PG input of sufficient magnitude) for a normally open fluidic transistor. (O to R) Simulations of diaphragm displacement for fluidic transistors with diaphragm area ratios of (left) 1 (γ1), (middle) 2 (γ2), and (right) 3.5 (γ3) for PG = (O) 0 kPa, (P) 13 kPa, (Q) 23 kPa, and (R) 54 kPa. See also movie S2. (S) Experimental results for relative QSD versus PG for normally open fluidic transistors with varying γ (PS = 20 kPa) (see also fig. S1). All error bands denote SD.
Fig. 3. Operating principle and experimental results…
Fig. 3. Operating principle and experimental results for a constant flow–based soft robotic turtle.
(…
Fig. 3. Operating principle and experimental results for a constant flow–based soft robotic turtle.(A to F) Conceptual illustrations of the soft robot, the integrated fluidic oscillator circuit, and analogous circuit diagrams corresponding to the six primary states based on constant-flow input conditions. (G) Experimental results for soft robot functionality under constant-flow conditions (10 ml/min) during a representative operational period. Scale bar, 3 cm; see also movie S3. Photo credits: Ruben Acevedo, University of Maryland College Park. (H) Quantified experimental results for normalized vertical deformation of each soft actuating limb versus time under constant-flow conditions (10 ml/min). Blue, left limb; red, right limb. a.u., arbitrary unit.
Fig. 4. Operating principle and experimental results…
Fig. 4. Operating principle and experimental results for a sinusoidal input–based soft robotic turtle.
(…
Fig. 4. Operating principle and experimental results for a sinusoidal input–based soft robotic turtle.(A to D) Conceptual illustrations and analogous circuit diagrams of the four primary states based on sinusoidal PG input conditions and a constant PS input. The integrated normally open fluidic transistors include distinct γ properties (γ1 < γ2 < γ3). (E) Fabrication results. Scale bar, 2 cm. Photo credits: Ruben Acevedo, University of Maryland College Park. (F) Experimental results for soft actuator–associated flipper displacements corresponding to a constant PS input of 40 kPa and varying PG input. (G) DIC-processed experimental results of the flipper displacement path under a constant PS input of 60 kPa and a sinusoidal PG input that oscillated from 0 to 80 kPa with a frequency of 0.1 Hz. Blue and red denote inflation- and deflation-associated displacement cycles, respectively.
Fig. 5. Concepts and results for a…
Fig. 5. Concepts and results for a preprogrammed, aperiodic fluidic input–based soft robotic hand with…
Fig. 5. Concepts and results for a preprogrammed, aperiodic fluidic input–based soft robotic hand with integrated fluidic circuitry.(A to D) Conceptual illustrations and analogous circuit diagrams of the four primary states based on distinct PG magnitudes, while a PS input remains constant. The integrated normally open fluidic transistors include distinct γ properties (γ1 < γ2 < γ3). (E and F) Experimental results for a soft robotic finger with an integrated γ3 fluidic transistor for PS = 20 kPa and PG = (E) 0 kPa and (F) 20 kPa. Scale bars, 2 cm; see also movie S4. Photo credits: Kristen M. Edwards, Jennifer Landry, and Ryan D. Sochol, University of Maryland College Park. (G) Quantified experimental results for fingertip actuation force versus PG for soft robotic finger–fluidic transistor systems with varying γ and PS of 10 kPa. Error bands denote SD. (H) Sequential time-lapse images of the PolyJet 3D printing process. Scale bar, 2 cm; see also movie S5. Photo credit: Joshua D. Hubbard, University of Maryland, College Park. (I) Fabrication results. Scale bar, 2 cm. Photo credit: Joshua D. Hubbard and Kristen M. Edwards, University of Maryland, College Park. (J) Experimental results for completing the first level of the Super Mario Bros. video game in real time in response to a preprogrammed PG input (PS programmed to remain constant). Callouts include the controller activation state, the game state, and an image of the soft robotic hand using the controller corresponding to demonstrative time points; see also movie S6. Photo credit: Joshua D. Hubbard, Ruben Acevedo and Kristen M. Edwards, University of Maryland, College Park.
Similar articlesSochol RD, Sweet E, Glick CC, Venkatesh S, Avetisyan A, Ekman KF, Raulinaitis A, Tsai A, Wienkers A, Korner K, Hanson K, Long A, Hightower BJ, Slatton G, Burnett DC, Massey TL, Iwai K, Lee LP, Pister KS, Lin L. Sochol RD, et al. Lab Chip. 2016 Feb 21;16(4):668-78. doi: 10.1039/c5lc01389e. Epub 2016 Jan 4. Lab Chip. 2016. PMID: 26725379 Free PMC article.
Song S, Joshi S, Paik J. Song S, et al. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021 Oct;8(20):e2100924. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100924. Epub 2021 Aug 29. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021. PMID: 34459157 Free PMC article.
Truby RL, Wehner M, Grosskopf AK, Vogt DM, Uzel SGM, Wood RJ, Lewis JA. Truby RL, et al. Adv Mater. 2018 Apr;30(15):e1706383. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706383. Epub 2018 Feb 27. Adv Mater. 2018. PMID: 29484726
Dong H, Weng T, Zheng K, Sun H, Chen B. Dong H, et al. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2024 Jun 18;11(3):954-976. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2023.0127. eCollection 2024 Jun. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2024. PMID: 39359605 Review.
Umedachi T, Vikas V, Trimmer BA. Umedachi T, et al. Bioinspir Biomim. 2016 Mar 10;11(2):025001. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/11/2/025001. Bioinspir Biomim. 2016. PMID: 26963596 Review.
Li Y, Wang P, Li R, Tao M, Liu Z, Qiao H. Li Y, et al. Front Neurorobot. 2022 Apr 27;16:843267. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.843267. eCollection 2022. Front Neurorobot. 2022. PMID: 35574228 Free PMC article. Review.
Sarker S, Forghani K, Wen Z, Halli RN, Hoag S, Flank S, Sochol RD. Sarker S, et al. Proc IEEE Int Conf Micro Electro Mech Syst. 2024 Jan;2024:433-436. doi: 10.1109/mems58180.2024.10439600. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Proc IEEE Int Conf Micro Electro Mech Syst. 2024. PMID: 38482161 Free PMC article.
Felix BM, Young OM, Andreou JT, Portwood N, Barvenik KJ, Barnes N, Weiss CR, Bailey CR, Gandhi D, Janowski M, Brown JD, Tubaldi E, Fuge M, Krieger A, Sochol RD. Felix BM, et al. IEEE Int Conf Soft Robot. 2024 Apr;2024:386-391. doi: 10.1109/robosoft60065.2024.10521948. Epub 2024 May 13. IEEE Int Conf Soft Robot. 2024. PMID: 40160281 Free PMC article.
Silva A, Fonseca D, Neto DM, Babcinschi M, Neto P. Silva A, et al. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024 Jul 17;5:0137. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0137. eCollection 2024. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024. PMID: 39022336 Free PMC article.
Nabae H, Kitamura E. Nabae H, et al. Front Robot AI. 2022 Nov 29;9:1008559. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.1008559. eCollection 2022. Front Robot AI. 2022. PMID: 36523444 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3