Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Association of Cancer Screening Deficit in the United States With the COVID-19 PandemicRonald C Chen et al. JAMA Oncol. 2021.
. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):878-884. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0884. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractImportance: The COVID-19 pandemic led to sharp declines in cancer screening. However, the total deficit in screening in the US associated with the pandemic and the differential impact on individuals in different geographic regions and by socioeconomic status (SES) index have yet to be fully characterized.
Objectives: To quantify the screening rates for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in different geographic regions and for individuals in different SES index quartiles and estimate the overall cancer screening deficit in 2020 across the US population.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study uses the HealthCore Integrated Research Database, which comprises single-payer administrative claims data and enrollment information covering approximately 60 million people in Medicare Advantage and commercial health plans from across geographically diverse regions of the US. Participants were individuals in the database in January through July of 2018, 2019, and 2020 without diagnosis of the cancer of interest prior to the analytic index month.
Exposures: Analytic index month and year.
Main outcomes and measures: Receipt of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer screening.
Results: Screening for all 3 cancers declined sharply in March through May of 2020 compared with 2019, with the sharpest decline in April (breast, -90.8%; colorectal, -79.3%; prostate, -63.4%) and near complete recovery of monthly screening rates by July for breast and prostate cancers. The absolute deficit across the US population in screening associated with the COVID-19 pandemic was estimated to be 3.9 million (breast), 3.8 million (colorectal), and 1.6 million (prostate). Geographic differences were observed: the Northeast experienced the sharpest declines in screening, while the West had a slower recovery compared with the Midwest and South. For example, percentage change in breast cancer screening rate (2020 vs 2019) for the month of April ranged from -87.3% (95% CI, -87.9% to -86.7%) in the West to -94.5% (95% CI, -94.9% to -94.1%) in the Northeast (decline). For the month of July, it ranged from -0.3% (95% CI, -2.1% to 1.5%) in the Midwest to -10.6% (-12.6% to -8.4%) in the West (recovery). By SES, the largest screening decline was observed in individuals in the highest SES index quartile, leading to a narrowing in the disparity in cancer screening by SES in 2020. For example, prostate cancer screening rates per 100 000 enrollees for individuals in the lowest and highest SES index quartiles, respectively, were 3525 (95% CI, 3444 to 3607) and 4329 (95% CI, 4271 to 4386) in April 2019 compared with 1535 (95% CI, 1480 to 1589) and 1338 (95% CI, 1306 to 1370) in April 2020. Multivariable analysis showed that telehealth use was associated with higher cancer screening.
Conclusions and relevance: Public health efforts are needed to address the large cancer screening deficit associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased use of screening modalities that do not require a procedure.
Conflict of interest statementConflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Chen reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Myovant, Bayer, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and Accuray outside the submitted work. Dr Haynes reported being employed by Anthem during the conduct of the study; receiving grants from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and contracts from the US Food and Drug Administration outside the submitted work. Dr Du reported receiving personal fees (salary) from HealthCore during the conduct of the study. Dr Barron reported being an Anthem employee and stock shareholder. Dr Katz reported receiving personal fees from Kite Pharma and Atara Biotherapeutics outside the submitted work.
FiguresFigure 1.. Screening Rates per 100 000…
Figure 1.. Screening Rates per 100 000 Enrollees per Month in 2018, 2019, and 2020
Figure 1.. Screening Rates per 100 000 Enrollees per Month in 2018, 2019, and 2020PSA indicates prostate-specific antigen.
Figure 2.. Screening Rates per 100 000…
Figure 2.. Screening Rates per 100 000 Enrollees per Month in 2019 and 2020 by…
Figure 2.. Screening Rates per 100 000 Enrollees per Month in 2019 and 2020 by Geographic RegionFigure 3.. Screening Rates per 100 000…
Figure 3.. Screening Rates per 100 000 Enrollees per Month in 2019 and 2020 by…
Figure 3.. Screening Rates per 100 000 Enrollees per Month in 2019 and 2020 by Socioeconomic Status Index Quartile Similar articlesLofters AK, Wu F, Frymire E, Kiran T, Vahabi M, Green ME, Glazier RH. Lofters AK, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43796. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37983033 Free PMC article.
Doan C, Li S, Goodwin JS. Doan C, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255589. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55589. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36735262 Free PMC article.
Cheng E, Soulos PR, Irwin ML, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Presley CJ, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA, Gross CP. Cheng E, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34919133 Free PMC article.
Kopel J, Ristic B, Brower GL, Goyal H. Kopel J, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 10;58(1):100. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010100. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 35056408 Free PMC article. Review.
Huntley C, Torr B, Sud A, Rowlands CF, Way R, Snape K, Hanson H, Swanton C, Broggio J, Lucassen A, McCartney M, Houlston RS, Hingorani AD, Jones ME, Turnbull C. Huntley C, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jun;24(6):658-668. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00156-0. Epub 2023 May 10. Lancet Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37178708 Review.
van den Puttelaar R, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Hahn AI, Rutter CM, Levin TR, Zauber AG, Meester RGS. van den Puttelaar R, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jan 9;32(1):22-29. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0544. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023. PMID: 36215205 Free PMC article.
Flanagan CA, Finney Rutten LJ, Kisiel JB, Lent JK, Bachtold JF, Swartz AW, Redwood DG. Flanagan CA, et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Oct 10;30:101016. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101016. eCollection 2022 Dec. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022. PMID: 36276262 Free PMC article.
Lee B, Young S, Williams R, Liang PS. Lee B, et al. J Med Screen. 2023 Jun;30(2):81-86. doi: 10.1177/09691413221128666. Epub 2022 Sep 26. J Med Screen. 2023. PMID: 36164282 Free PMC article.
Pesapane F, Rotili A, Valconi E, Agazzi GM, Montesano M, Penco S, Nicosia L, Bozzini A, Meneghetti L, Latronico A, Pizzamiglio M, Rossero E, Gaeta A, Raimondi S, Pizzoli SFM, Grasso R, Carrafiello G, Pravettoni G, Cassano E. Pesapane F, et al. Br J Radiol. 2023 Jan 1;96(1141):20220569. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220569. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Br J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36314388 Free PMC article.
Tangka FKL, Kenney K, Miller J, Howard DH. Tangka FKL, et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2025 May;36(5):531-538. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01947-4. Epub 2025 Jan 8. Cancer Causes Control. 2025. PMID: 39779647
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3