Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
The impact of treatment facility type on the survival of brain metastases patients regardless of the primary cancer typeSaber Amin et al. BMC Cancer. 2021.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08129-4. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs) require multidisciplinary care, and treatment facility may play a role. This study aimed to investigate the impact of receiving treatment at academic centers on the overall survival (OS) of cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs) regardless of the primary cancer site.
Methods: This retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) included patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, other types of lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and kidney cancer and had brain metastases at the time of diagnosis. The data were extracted from the de-identified file of the NCDB, a joint program of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age at diagnosis, race, sex, place of living, income, education, primary tumor type, year of diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery of the primary cancer site was used to determine treatment facility-associated hazard ratios (HR) for survival. Overall survival was the primary outcome, which was analyzed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling.
Results: A total of 93,633 patients were analyzed, among whom 31,579/93,633 (34.09%) were treated at academic centers. Based on the log-rank analysis, patients who received treatment at an academic facility had significantly improved OS (median OS: 6.18, CI: 6.05-6.31 vs. 4.57, CI: 4.50-4.63 months; p < 0.001) compared to patients who were treated at non-academic facilities. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, receiving treatment at an academic facility was associated with significantly improved OS (HR: 0.85, CI: 0.84-0.87; p < 0.001) compared to non-academic facility.
Conclusions: In this extensive analysis of the NCDB, receiving treatment at academic centers was associated with significantly improved OS compared to treatment at non-academic centers.
Keywords: Brain metastases; Overall survival; Radiation therapy; Surgery; Treatment facility.
Conflict of interest statementThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
FiguresFig. 1
a Patient selection diagram. b…
Fig. 1
a Patient selection diagram. b The trend of receiving treatment at academic and…
Fig. 1a Patient selection diagram. b The trend of receiving treatment at academic and non-academic hospitals over time
Fig. 2
a Overall survival for patients…
Fig. 2
a Overall survival for patients receiving treatment at academic (AC-red) or non-academic centers…
Fig. 2a Overall survival for patients receiving treatment at academic (AC-red) or non-academic centers (NAC-blue). b Overall survival for patients receiving treatment at Community Cancer Program (CCP-blue), Comprehensive Community Cancer Program (CCCP-red), Integrated Network Cancer Program (INCP-maroon), and academic Centers/Research (AC/R-green)
Similar articlesAmin S, Baine MJ, Meza JL, Lin C. Amin S, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015444. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15444. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32902650 Free PMC article.
Zhu P, Du XL, Zhu JJ, Esquenazi Y. Zhu P, et al. J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 15;132(2):491-502. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS182247. Print 2020 Feb 1. J Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30771780
Wegner RE, Hasan S, Williamson RW, Finley G, Fuhrer R, Colonias A, Karlovits SM. Wegner RE, et al. Acta Oncol. 2019 Apr;58(4):499-504. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1564841. Epub 2019 Feb 7. Acta Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30732516
McAllister J, Amin S, Lin C. McAllister J, et al. Future Oncol. 2022 Mar;18(10):1273-1284. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0986. Epub 2022 Feb 4. Future Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35114803
de Bitter TJJ, Trapman DM, Simmer F, Hugen N, de Savornin Lohman EAJ, de Reuver PR, Verheij J, Nagtegaal ID, van der Post RS. de Bitter TJJ, et al. Virchows Arch. 2022 Jun;480(6):1201-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03314-7. Epub 2022 Mar 31. Virchows Arch. 2022. PMID: 35357569 Free PMC article. Review.
Bovi JA, Fadul CE. Bovi JA, et al. Neurooncol Pract. 2021 Nov 10;8(6):625-626. doi: 10.1093/nop/npab057. eCollection 2021 Dec. Neurooncol Pract. 2021. PMID: 34777831 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Riggs J, Ahn H, Longmoore H, Jardim P, Kim MJ, Kasper EM, Han J, Lam FC. Riggs J, et al. Neurooncol Adv. 2023 Sep 28;5(1):vdad113. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad113. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Neurooncol Adv. 2023. PMID: 37860268 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Baskaran AB, Buerki RA, Khan OH, Gondi V, Stupp R, Lukas RV, Villaflor VM. Baskaran AB, et al. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3901. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123901. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37373596 Free PMC article.
De Leo AN, Giap F, Culbert MM, Drescher N, Brisson RJ, Cassidy V, Augustin EM, Casper A, Horowitz DH, Cheng SK, Yu JB. De Leo AN, et al. Radiat Oncol J. 2023 Jun;41(2):108-119. doi: 10.3857/roj.2023.00164. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Radiat Oncol J. 2023. PMID: 37403353 Free PMC article.
Joung RH, Nelson H, Mullett TW, Kurtzman SH, Shafir S, Harris JB, Yao KA, Brajcich BC, Bilimoria KY, Cance WG. Joung RH, et al. Cancer. 2022 Jun 1;128(11):2119-2125. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34157. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35307815 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3