Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemicJorge A Rodriguez et al. Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan.
doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88573. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced health systems to offer video and telephone visits as in-person visit alternatives. Although video visits offer some benefits compared with telephone visits, they require complex setup, which may disadvantage some patients due to the "digital divide." Our objective was to determine patient and neighborhood characteristics associated with visit modality.
Study design: This was a cross-sectional study across 1652 primary care and specialty care practices of adult patients at an integrated health system from April 23 to June 1, 2020.
Methods: We used electronic health record and administrative data. Our primary outcome was visit modality (in-person, video, or telephone), which was captured using billing codes. We assessed predictors of using video vs telephone using multivariable logistic regression. We used hierarchical logistic regression to determine the contribution of patient-, physician-, and practice-level components of variance in the choice of video or telephone visits.
Results: We analyzed 231,596 visits by 162,102 patients. Sixty-five percent of the visits were virtual (31.7% telephone, 33.5% video). Patients who were older than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.40-0.43), Black (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63), Hispanic (AOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.80), Spanish-speaking (AOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.61), and from areas with low broadband access (AOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) were less likely to use video visits. Practices (38%) and clinicians (26%) drove more of the variation in video visit use than patients (9%).
Conclusions: Telemedicine access differences may compound disparities in chronic disease and COVID-19 outcomes. Institutions should monitor video visit use across demographics and equip patients, clinicians, and practices to promote telemedicine equity.
Conflict of interest statementAuthor Disclosures: The authors report no relationship or financial interest with any entity that would pose a conflict of interest with the subject matter of this article.
FiguresFIGURE 1.. Trends in Visit Type (March…
FIGURE 1.. Trends in Visit Type (March 1-June 1, 2020) a
a Excludes ambiguous encounters.
FIGURE 1.. Trends in Visit Type (March 1-June 1, 2020)aaExcludes ambiguous encounters.
FIGURE 2.. Trend in Video Visit Use…
FIGURE 2.. Trend in Video Visit Use by Patient Demographics a
a Y-axis represents proportion of…
FIGURE 2.. Trend in Video Visit Use by Patient DemographicsaaY-axis represents proportion of all telemedicine visits that were video visits.
FIGURE 3.. Association of Telemedicine Vist Type…
FIGURE 3.. Association of Telemedicine Vist Type With Patient- and Zip Code-Level Factors a
a Excludes…
FIGURE 3.. Association of Telemedicine Vist Type With Patient- and Zip Code-Level FactorsaaExcludes ambiguous encounters. *** P < .001.
Comment inRodriguez JA, Bates DW, Samal L, Saadi A, Schwamm LH. Rodriguez JA, et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1340. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01041. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021. PMID: 34339238 No abstract available.
Payán DD, Rodriguez HP. Payán DD, et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1340. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00940. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021. PMID: 34339248 No abstract available.
Eberly LA, Kallan MJ, Julien HM, Haynes N, Khatana SAM, Nathan AS, Snider C, Chokshi NP, Eneanya ND, Takvorian SU, Anastos-Wallen R, Chaiyachati K, Ambrose M, O'Quinn R, Seigerman M, Goldberg LR, Leri D, Choi K, Gitelman Y, Kolansky DM, Cappola TP, Ferrari VA, Hanson CW, Deleener ME, Adusumalli S. Eberly LA, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31640. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33372974 Free PMC article.
Bowman CA, Nuh M, Rahim A. Bowman CA, et al. Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan;27(1):9-11. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88571. Am J Manag Care. 2021. PMID: 33471456
Yuan N, Pevnick JM, Botting PG, Elad Y, Miller SJ, Cheng S, Ebinger JE. Yuan N, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4157. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33818619 Free PMC article.
Javier-DesLoges J, Meagher M, Soliman S, Yuan J, Hakimi K, Ghali F, Nalawade V, Patel DN, Monga M, Murphy JD, Derweesh I. Javier-DesLoges J, et al. Urology. 2022 May;163:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.037. Epub 2022 Jan 1. Urology. 2022. PMID: 34979219 Free PMC article. Review.
McBride SM, Hughes HK, MacDonald SM. McBride SM, et al. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct;34(4):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.07.010. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39271281 Review.
Khazanchi R, Winkelman TNA, Pandita D, Jelinek R, Shearer RD, Bodurtha PJ. Khazanchi R, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112857. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12857. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34100940 Free PMC article.
Esber A, Teufel M, Jahre L, In der Schmitten J, Skoda EM, Bäuerle A. Esber A, et al. Digit Health. 2023 Jan 18;9:20552076221149317. doi: 10.1177/20552076221149317. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 36815005 Free PMC article.
Roy J, Levy DR, Senathirajah Y. Roy J, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 13;24(4):e35037. doi: 10.2196/35037. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35416778 Free PMC article.
Chung YG, Person CM, O'Banion J, Primo SA. Chung YG, et al. Adv Ophthalmol Optom. 2022 Aug;7(1):311-323. doi: 10.1016/j.yaoo.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 22. Adv Ophthalmol Optom. 2022. PMID: 35474943 Free PMC article. Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3