A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32853538/ below:

Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Practices: An ACR/RBMA Survey

. 2020 Nov;17(11):1525-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Practices: An ACR/RBMA Survey Xiao Wu  2 Howard B Fleishon  3 Richard Duszak Jr  4 Ezequiel Silva 3rd  5 Geraldine B McGinty  6 Claire Bender  7 Beth Williams  8 Neale Pashley  9 Casey J B Stengel  10 Jason J Naidich  11 Danny Hughes  12 Pina C Sanelli  11

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Practices: An ACR/RBMA Survey

Ajay Malhotra et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov.

. 2020 Nov;17(11):1525-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Authors Ajay Malhotra  1 Xiao Wu  2 Howard B Fleishon  3 Richard Duszak Jr  4 Ezequiel Silva 3rd  5 Geraldine B McGinty  6 Claire Bender  7 Beth Williams  8 Neale Pashley  9 Casey J B Stengel  10 Jason J Naidich  11 Danny Hughes  12 Pina C Sanelli  11 Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected radiology practices in many ways. The aim of this survey was to estimate declines in imaging volumes and financial impact across different practice settings during April 2020.

Methods: The survey, comprising 48 questions, was conducted among members of the ACR and the Radiology Business Management Association during May 2020. Survey questions focused on practice demographics, volumes, financials, personnel and staff adjustments, and anticipation of recovery.

Results: During April 2020, nearly all radiology practices reported substantial (56.4%-63.7%) declines in imaging volumes, with outpatient imaging volumes most severely affected. Mean gross charges declined by 50.1% to 54.8% and collections declined by 46.4% to 53.9%. Percentage reductions did not correlate with practice size. The majority of respondents believed that volumes would recover but not entirely (62%-88%) and anticipated a short-term recovery, with a surge likely in the short term due to postponement of elective imaging (52%-64%). About 16% of respondents reported that radiologists in their practices tested positive for COVID-19. More than half (52.3%) reported that availability of personal protective equipment had become an issue or was inadequate. A majority (62.3%) reported that their practices had existing remote reading or teleradiology capabilities in place before the pandemic, and 22.3% developed such capabilities in response to the pandemic.

Conclusions: Radiology practices across different settings experienced substantial declines in imaging volumes and collections during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020. Most are actively engaged in both short- and long-term operational adjustments.

Keywords: COVID-19; imaging volume; impact; radiology practice; survey.

Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1

Plots of reported percentages of…

Fig 1

Plots of reported percentages of reduction in total imaging volume against the number…

Fig 1

Plots of reported percentages of reduction in total imaging volume against the number of estimated full-time equivalents (FTEs). The best-fit linear regression line is the solid black line, with the 95% confidence interval depicted by dotted lines.

Fig 2

Plots of reported percentages of…

Fig 2

Plots of reported percentages of reduction in receipts against the number of estimated…

Fig 2

Plots of reported percentages of reduction in receipts against the number of estimated full-time equivalents (FTEs). The best-fit linear regression line is the solid black line, with the 95% confidence interval depicted by dotted lines.

Fig 3

Plots of reported percentages of…

Fig 3

Plots of reported percentages of reduction in gross charges against the number of…

Fig 3

Plots of reported percentages of reduction in gross charges against the number of estimated full-time equivalents (FTEs). The best-fit linear regression line is the solid black line, with the 95% confidence interval depicted by dotted lines.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Naidich J.J., Boltyenkov A., Wang J.J., Chusid J., Hughes D., Sanelli P.C. Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on imaging case volumes. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17:865–872. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madhuripan N., Cheung H.M.C., Cheong L.H.A., Jawahar A., Willis M.H., Larson D.B. Variables influencing radiology volume recovery during the next phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17:855–864. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shapiro S.D., Rothman P.B. How academic health systems can move forward once COVID-19 wanes. JAMA. 2020;323:2377–2378. - PubMed
    1. Rubin R. COVID-19’s crushing effects on medical practices, some of which might not survive. JAMA. 2020;324:321–323. - PubMed
    1. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Pub L No 116-136 (2020).

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3