Collaborators, Affiliations
CollaboratorsItem in Clipboard
Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit-risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infectionKaja Abbas et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct.
. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1264-e1272. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30308-9. Epub 2020 Jul 17. CollaboratorsItem in Clipboard
Erratum in[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1371. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30419-8. Epub 2020 Sep 24. Lancet Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32979934 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Background: National immunisation programmes globally are at risk of suspension due to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to compare the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa with the risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through visiting routine vaccination service delivery points.
Methods: We considered a high-impact scenario and a low-impact scenario to approximate the child deaths that could be caused by immunisation coverage reductions during COVID-19 outbreaks. In the high-impact scenario, we used previously reported country-specific child mortality impact estimates of childhood immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, measles, meningitis A, rubella, and yellow fever to approximate the future deaths averted before 5 years of age by routine childhood vaccination during a 6-month COVID-19 risk period without catch-up campaigns. In the low-impact scenario, we approximated the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation on only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks during the COVID-19 risk period. We assumed that contact-reducing interventions flattened the outbreak curve during the COVID-19 risk period, that 60% of the population will have been infected by the end of that period, that children can be infected by either vaccinators or during transport, and that upon child infection the whole household will be infected. Country-specific household age structure estimates and age-dependent infection-fatality rates were applied to calculate the number of deaths attributable to the vaccination clinic visits. We present benefit-risk ratios for routine childhood immunisation, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Findings: In the high-impact scenario, for every one excess COVID-19 death attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infections acquired during routine vaccination clinic visits, 84 (95% UI 14-267) deaths in children could be prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa. The benefit-risk ratio for the vaccinated children is 85 000 (4900-546 000), for their siblings (<20 years) is 75 000 (4400-483 000), for their parents or adult carers (aged 20-60 years) is 769 (148-2700), and for older adults (>60 years) is 96 (14-307). In the low-impact scenario that approximates the health benefits to only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks, the benefit-risk ratio to the households of vaccinated children is 3 (0-10); if the risk to only the vaccinated children is considered, the benefit-risk ratio is 3000 (182-21 000).
Interpretation: The deaths prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa outweigh the excess risk of COVID-19 deaths associated with vaccination clinic visits, especially for the vaccinated children. Routine childhood immunisation should be sustained in Africa as much as possible, while considering other factors such as logistical constraints, staff shortages, and reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Funding: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
FiguresFigure 1
Benefit–risk ratios for sustaining routine…
Figure 1
Benefit–risk ratios for sustaining routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa…
Figure 1Benefit–risk ratios for sustaining routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa In this scenario, we assume that the suspension of immunisation will result in a cohort of unvaccinated children who have the same risk of disease as children in a completely unvaccinated population, and their vulnerability persists until they are 5 years old (ie, no catch-up campaigns). A benefit–risk ratio greater than 1 indicates in favour of sustaining the routine childhood immunisation programme. Countries shaded in grey had missing data.
Figure 2
Benefit–risk ratios of sustaining routine…
Figure 2
Benefit–risk ratios of sustaining routine childhood vaccination, with a minimal chance of a…
Figure 2Benefit–risk ratios of sustaining routine childhood vaccination, with a minimal chance of a measles outbreak and no other vaccine-preventable outbreaks, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa In this scenario, we assumed that, in the absence of immunisation, herd immunity would protect children missing vaccination for all diseases except measles. We assumed that the chance of a measles outbreak during the 6-month suspension of immunisation was 12·5%, and no other vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks occurred. Countries shaded in grey had missing data.
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis for uncertainty in…
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis for uncertainty in the benefit–risk ratio estimates The tornado diagram was…
Figure 3Sensitivity analysis for uncertainty in the benefit–risk ratio estimates The tornado diagram was constructed using a multivariate Poisson regression model fitted to the estimated posterior distribution of the benefit–risk ratio using our model input parameters as predictors, and treating total deaths averted by childhood immunisation as a single variable. SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Similar articlesHartner AM, Li X, Echeverria-Londono S, Roth J, Abbas K, Auzenbergs M, de Villiers MJ, Ferrari MJ, Fraser K, Fu H, Hallett T, Hinsley W, Jit M, Karachaliou A, Moore SM, Nayagam S, Papadopoulos T, Perkins TA, Portnoy A, Minh QT, Vynnycky E, Winter AK, Burrows H, Chen C, Clapham HE, Deshpande A, Hauryski S, Huber J, Jean K, Kim C, Kim JH, Koh J, Lopman BA, Pitzer VE, Tam Y, Lambach P, Sim SY, Woodruff K, Ferguson NM, Trotter CL, Gaythorpe KAM. Hartner AM, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Apr;12(4):e563-e571. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00603-4. Lancet Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 38485425 Free PMC article.
Clark A, Jit M, Warren-Gash C, Guthrie B, Wang HHX, Mercer SW, Sanderson C, McKee M, Troeger C, Ong KL, Checchi F, Perel P, Joseph S, Gibbs HP, Banerjee A, Eggo RM; Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 working group. Clark A, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1003-e1017. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30264-3. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Lancet Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32553130 Free PMC article.
Gaythorpe KA, Abbas K, Huber J, Karachaliou A, Thakkar N, Woodruff K, Li X, Echeverria-Londono S; VIMC Working Group on COVID-19 Impact on Vaccine Preventable Disease; Ferrari M, Jackson ML, McCarthy K, Perkins TA, Trotter C, Jit M. Gaythorpe KA, et al. Elife. 2021 Jun 24;10:e67023. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67023. Elife. 2021. PMID: 34165077 Free PMC article.
Shalviri G, Mohebbi N, Mirbaha F, Majdzadeh R, Yazdizadeh B, Gholami K, Grobler L, Rose CJ, Chin WY. Shalviri G, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 29;10(10):CD012594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012594.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39470185 Free PMC article.
Moraes VY, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Moraes VY, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD010071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010071.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24782334 Free PMC article. Review.
MacDonald NE, Comeau JL, Dubé È, Bucci LM. MacDonald NE, et al. Can J Public Health. 2020 Aug;111(4):469-472. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00385-4. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Can J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32761546 Free PMC article.
Shumba C, Maina R, Mbuthia G, Kimani R, Mbugua S, Shah S, Abubakar A, Luchters S, Shaibu S, Ndirangu E. Shumba C, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 25;17(19):7028. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197028. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32992966 Free PMC article. Review.
Summan A, Nandi A, Shet A, Laxminarayan R. Summan A, et al. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Jan;8:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100099. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023. PMID: 36285007 Free PMC article.
Toh ZQ, Russell FM, Garland SM, Mulholland EK, Patton G, Licciardi PV. Toh ZQ, et al. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Mar 2;5(2):pkab011. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab011. eCollection 2021 Apr. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021. PMID: 33748668 Free PMC article.
Osei I, Sarwar G, Hossain I, Sonko K, Ceesay L, Baldeh B, Secka E, Mackenzie GA. Osei I, et al. Vaccine. 2022 Oct 19;40(44):6367-6373. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.031. Epub 2022 Sep 13. Vaccine. 2022. PMID: 36180374 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3