A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32685892/ below:

Pulmonary embolism during the COVID-19 pandemic: Decline in diagnostic procedures and incidence at a university hospital

. 2020 Jun 25;4(5):835-841. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12391. eCollection 2020 Jul. Pulmonary embolism during the COVID-19 pandemic: Decline in diagnostic procedures and incidence at a university hospital

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Pulmonary embolism during the COVID-19 pandemic: Decline in diagnostic procedures and incidence at a university hospital

Stephan Nopp et al. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020.

. 2020 Jun 25;4(5):835-841. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12391. eCollection 2020 Jul. Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has focused medical attention on treating affected patients and protecting others from infection. However, concerns have been raised regarding the pandemic´s impact and associated containment measures (eg curfew, lockdown) on non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute medical diseases.

Objectives: To investigate changes in the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the period before the pandemic and reference periods in previous years.

Methods: In this single-center study, we explored all diagnostic imaging tests performed for suspected PE between weeks 1 and 17 of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. Incidence of PE (ie, primary outcome) was analyzed. Secondary outcomes included number of imaging tests for suspected PE.

Results: Compared to weeks 1 to 11, 2020, an abrupt decline in PE diagnosis (mean weekly rate, 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-6.6 vs 1.8; 95% CI, 0.0-3.6) and imaging tests (mean weekly rate, 32.5; 95% CI, 27.5-37.6 vs. 17.3; 95% CI, 11.6-23.1) was observed from week 12, with beginning of the containment measures and public lockdown in Austria. Compared to weeks 12 to 17 of 2018 and 2019, PE incidence and imaging tests were similarly decreased from 5.3 (95% CI, 3.6-7.1) to 1.8 (95% CI, 0.0-3.6) and 31.5 (95% CI, 27.1-35.9) to 17.3 (95% CI, 11.6-23.1), respectively. The median simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) score of PE patients during the pandemic was higher than in all other PE patients (3; interquartile range, 1-3 vs 1; interquartile range, 0-2; P = .002).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic has an impact on non-COVID-19-related acute diseases as shown by the decline in incidence of PE and imaging procedures for diagnostic workup. Further studies from other hospitals are needed to confirm our findings.

Keywords: COVID‐19; diagnostic imaging; incidence; pulmonary embolism; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; thromboembolism.

© 2020 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1

Reduction of imaging tests at…

FIGURE 1

Reduction of imaging tests at the Vienna General Hospital carried out to diagnose…

FIGURE 1

Reduction of imaging tests at the Vienna General Hospital carried out to diagnose pulmonary embolism. (A) Dotted vertical line shows start of the public health measures in Austria. (B) Interyear analysis between the pandemic period in year 2020 (weeks 12‐17) and the reference period in 2018 and 2019 displayed as mean (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) weekly rate of tests: Rate ratio of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.44‐0.68). Bars represent the mean, and whiskers represent the upper limit of the 95% CI.

FIGURE 2

Decline in pulmonary embolus (PE)…

FIGURE 2

Decline in pulmonary embolus (PE) cases treated at the Vienna General Hospital associated…

FIGURE 2

Decline in pulmonary embolus (PE) cases treated at the Vienna General Hospital associated with the beginning of COVID‐19 containment measures in Austria. (A) Dotted vertical line shows start of the public health measures in Austria. (B) Interyear analysis between the pandemic period in year 2020 (weeks 12‐17) and the reference period in 2018 and 2019 displayed as mean (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) weekly incidence rates: Incidence‐rate ratio of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.18‐0.65). Bars represent the mean, and whiskers represent the upper limit of the 95% CI.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. World Health Organization . Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): situation report, 97. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
    1. Rosenbaum L. The untold toll — the pandemic’s effects on patients without Covid‐19. N Engl J Med. 2020. 10.1056/NEJMms2009984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metzler B, Siostrzonek P, Binder RK, Bauer A, Reinstadler SJ. Decline of acute coronary syndrome admissions in Austria since the outbreak of COVID‐19: the pandemic response causes cardiac collateral damage. Eur Heart J. 2020;41 (19):1852–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez‐Leor O, Cid‐Álvarez B, Ojeda S, Martín‐Moreiras J, Ramón Rumoroso J, López‐Palop R, et al. Impacto de la pandemia de COVID‐19 sobre la actividad asistencial en cardiología intervencionista en España. REC Interv Cardiol. 2020;2:82–9.
    1. Tam C‐CF, Cheung K‐S, Lam S, Wong A, Yung A, Sze M, et al. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) Outbreak on ST‐Segment‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care in Hong Kong. China. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2020;13(4):e006631. - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3