A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32052170/ below:

ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening

Review

. 2020 Jun;30(6):3277-3294. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06727-7. Epub 2020 Feb 12. ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening Anne-Marie Baird  2 Torsten Gerriet Blum  3 Lorenzo Bonomo  4 Clementine Bostantzoglou  5 Otto Burghuber  6 Blanka Čepická  7 Alina Comanescu  8 Sébastien Couraud  9   10 Anand Devaraj  11 Vagn Jespersen  12 Sergey Morozov  13 Inbar Nardi Agmon  14 Nir Peled  15 Pippa Powell  16 Helmut Prosch  17 Sofia Ravara  18   19 Janette Rawlinson  20 Marie-Pierre Revel  21 Mario Silva  22 Annemiek Snoeckx  23 Bram van Ginneken  24   25 Jan P van Meerbeeck  26 Constantine Vardavas  27   28 Oyunbileg von Stackelberg  29 Mina Gaga  30 European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Review

ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening

Hans-Ulrich Kauczor et al. Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun.

. 2020 Jun;30(6):3277-3294. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06727-7. Epub 2020 Feb 12. Authors Hans-Ulrich Kauczor  1 Anne-Marie Baird  2 Torsten Gerriet Blum  3 Lorenzo Bonomo  4 Clementine Bostantzoglou  5 Otto Burghuber  6 Blanka Čepická  7 Alina Comanescu  8 Sébastien Couraud  9   10 Anand Devaraj  11 Vagn Jespersen  12 Sergey Morozov  13 Inbar Nardi Agmon  14 Nir Peled  15 Pippa Powell  16 Helmut Prosch  17 Sofia Ravara  18   19 Janette Rawlinson  20 Marie-Pierre Revel  21 Mario Silva  22 Annemiek Snoeckx  23 Bram van Ginneken  24   25 Jan P van Meerbeeck  26 Constantine Vardavas  27   28 Oyunbileg von Stackelberg  29 Mina Gaga  30 European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

In Europe, lung cancer ranks third among the most common cancers, remaining the biggest killer. Since the publication of the first European Society of Radiology and European Respiratory Society joint white paper on lung cancer screening (LCS) in 2015, many new findings have been published and discussions have increased considerably. Thus, this updated expert opinion represents a narrative, non-systematic review of the evidence from LCS trials and description of the current practice of LCS as well as aspects that have not received adequate attention until now. Reaching out to the potential participants (persons at high risk), optimal communication and shared decision-making will be key starting points. Furthermore, standards for infrastructure, pathways and quality assurance are pivotal, including promoting tobacco cessation, benefits and harms, overdiagnosis, quality, minimum radiation exposure, definition of management of positive screen results and incidental findings linked to respective actions as well as cost-effectiveness. This requires a multidisciplinary team with experts from pulmonology and radiology as well as thoracic oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, family doctors, patient representatives and others. The ESR and ERS agree that Europe's health systems need to adapt to allow citizens to benefit from organised pathways, rather than unsupervised initiatives, to allow early diagnosis of lung cancer and reduce the mortality rate. Now is the time to set up and conduct demonstration programmes focusing, among other points, on methodology, standardisation, tobacco cessation, education on healthy lifestyle, cost-effectiveness and a central registry.Key Points• Pulmonologists and radiologists both have key roles in the set up of multidisciplinary LCS teams with experts from many other fields.• Pulmonologists identify people eligible for LCS, reach out to family doctors, share the decision-making process and promote tobacco cessation.• Radiologists ensure appropriate image quality, minimum dose and a standardised reading/reporting algorithm, together with a clear definition of a "positive screen".• Strict algorithms define the exact management of screen-detected nodules and incidental findings.• For LCS to be (cost-)effective, it has to target a population defined by risk prediction models.

Keywords: Carcinoma, bronchogenic; Cost-benefit analysis; Early detection of cancer; Lung neoplasms; Tobacco use cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer 103:356–387 - PubMed
    1. Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P et al (2017) European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2017, with focus on lung cancer. Ann Oncol 28:1117–1123 - PubMed
    1. World Bank (1999) Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control (English). World Bank, Washington, DC
    1. Kauczor HU, Bonomo L, Gaga M et al (2015) ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening. Eur Respir J 46:28–39 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Quaife SL, Vrinten C, Ruparel M et al (2018) Smokers’ interest in a lung cancer screening programme: a national survey in England. BMC Cancer 18:497 - PubMed - PMC

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3