Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
The Current State of Teleradiology Across the United States: A National Survey of Radiologists' Habits, Attitudes, and Perceptions on Teleradiology PracticeAndrew B Rosenkrantz et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Dec.
. 2019 Dec;16(12):1677-1687. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.053. Epub 2019 Jul 1. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractPurpose: To explore the current state of teleradiology practice, defined as the interpretation of imaging examinations at a different facility from where the examination was performed.
Methods: A national survey addressing radiologists' habits, attitudes, and perceptions regarding teleradiology was distributed by e-mail to a random sample of ACR members in early 2019.
Results: Among 731 of 936 respondents who indicated a non-teleradiologist primary work setting, 85.6% reported performing teleradiology within the past 10 years and 25.4% reported that teleradiology represents a majority of their annual imaging volumes; 84.4% performed teleradiology for internal examinations and 45.7% for external examinations; 46.2% performed teleradiology for rural areas and 37.2% for critical access hospitals; 91.3% performed teleradiology during weekday normal business hours and 44.5% to 79.6% over evening, overnight, and weekend hours. In all, 76.9% to 86.2% perceived value from teleradiology for geographic, after-hours, and multispecialty coverage, as well as reduced interpretation turnaround times. The most common challenges for teleradiology were electronic health record access (62.8%), quality assurance (53.8%), and technologist proximity (48.4%). The strategy most commonly considered useful for improving teleradiology was technical interpretation standards (33.3%). Radiologists in smaller practices were less likely to perform teleradiology or performed teleradiology for lower fractions of work, were less likely to experience coverage advantages of teleradiology, and reported larger implementation challenges, particularly relating to electronic health records and prior examination access.
Conclusion: Despite historic concerns, teleradiology is widespread throughout modern radiology practice, helping practices achieve geographic, after-hours, and multispecialty coverage; reducing turnaround times; and expanding underserved access. Nonetheless, quality assurance of offsite examinations remains necessary. IT integration solutions could help smaller practices achieve teleradiology's benefits.
Keywords: Digital imaging; radiology practice; survey; teleradiology.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articlesAlahmad H, Almanaa MA, Abanomy A, Alarifi M, Alenazi K, Matabi M, Albathi R, Moslem R. Alahmad H, et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 May 6;17:2083-2092. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S460547. eCollection 2024. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024. PMID: 38736539 Free PMC article.
Chong S, Hanna T, Lamoureux C, Ma T, Weber S, Johnson JO, Friedberg E, Pyatt RS , Jr, Everett CJ, Johnson TD. Chong S, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Apr;218(4):738-745. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26656. Epub 2021 Nov 3. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022. PMID: 34730371
Alruwaili AR, Alshammari AA, Alsalhi FM, Aldamen SA, Alamri HS. Alruwaili AR, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1327. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11706-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39482669 Free PMC article.
Hunter TB, Krupinski EA. Hunter TB, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2014 Apr 15;2(2):192-206. doi: 10.3390/healthcare2020192. Healthcare (Basel). 2014. PMID: 27429270 Free PMC article. Review.
Hanna TN, Steenburg SD, Rosenkrantz AB, Pyatt RS Jr, Duszak R Jr, Friedberg EB. Hanna TN, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Dec;215(6):1411-1416. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23007. Epub 2020 Oct 14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 33052736 Review.
Nigatu AM, Yilma TM, Gezie LD, Gebrewold Y, Gullslett MK, Mengiste SA, Tilahun B. Nigatu AM, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301021. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38547241 Free PMC article.
Cruz MJ, Nieblas-Bedolla E, Young CC, Feroze AH, Williams JR, Ellenbogen RG, Levitt MR. Cruz MJ, et al. Neurosurgery. 2021 Aug 16;89(3):364-371. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab185. Neurosurgery. 2021. PMID: 34133724 Free PMC article.
Al-Dahery ST, Alsharif WM, Alamri FH, Nawawi SA, Mofti WK, Alhazmi FH, Alshamrani KM, Suliman AG, Qurashi AA. Al-Dahery ST, et al. Saudi Med J. 2023 Feb;44(2):202-210. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.2.20220793. Saudi Med J. 2023. PMID: 36773982 Free PMC article.
Yemeshev Y, Nurmashev B, Zimba O, Kocyigit BF. Yemeshev Y, et al. Rheumatol Int. 2025 Feb 13;45(3):51. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05810-w. Rheumatol Int. 2025. PMID: 39945826 Free PMC article. Review.
Suzuki K, Saito H, Saito Y, Endo A, Togo D, Hanada R, Iwaya R, Sato T, Niida K, Suzuki R, Togashi J, Ito S, Tanaka Y, Nawata Y, Igarashi K, Hamamoto H, Ozaki A, Tanimoto T, Shimamura Y, Sugawara S, Nakashima M, Okuzono T, Nakahori M, Chonan A, Matsuda T. Suzuki K, et al. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01264-x. Online ahead of print. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024. PMID: 39289305
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3