Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Linking Reminders and Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Results From a National SurveyElizabeth J Siembida et al. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov.
doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00090. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractPurpose: Physician reminders have successfully increased rates of mammography. However, considering recent changes to breast cancer screening guidelines that disagree on the optimal age to start and stop mammography screening, we sought to examine the extent to which reminders have been deployed for breast cancer screening targeting younger and older patients.
Methods: A mailed survey was sent to a national sample of 2,000 primary care physicians between May and September 2016. Physicians were asked whether they received reminders to screen women in various age groups (40 to 44, 45 to 49, and ≥ 75 years), the organizational screening guidelines they trusted most, and whether they recommended routine breast cancer screening to average-risk women in the different age groups. Using regression models, we assessed the association between reminders and physician screening recommendations, controlling for physician and practice characteristics, and evaluated whether the association varied by the guidelines they trusted.
Results: A total of 871 physicians responded (adjusted response rate, 52.3%). Overall, 28.9% of physicians reported receiving reminders for patient ages 40 to 44 years, 32.5% for patient ages 45 to 49 years, and 16.5% for patient ages ≥ 75 years. Receiving reminders significantly increased the likelihood of physicians recommending mammography screening. In adjusted analyses, 84% (95% CI, 77% to 90%) of physicians who received reminders recommended screening for women ages ≥ 75 versus 65% (95% CI, 62% to 69%) of those who did not receive reminders. The associations between reminders and screening recommendations remained consistent regardless of which guidelines physicians reported trusting.
Conclusion: Reminders were significantly associated with increases in physician screening recommendations for mammography, underscoring the need for careful implementation in scenarios where guidelines are discordant.
Conflict of interest statement Elizabeth J. SiembidaNo relationship to disclose
Archana RadhakrishnanNo relationship to disclose
Sarah A. NowakNo relationship to disclose
Andrew M. ParkerNo relationship to disclose
Craig Evan PollackStock and Other Ownership Interests: Amgen, Danaher, Dow Chemical, Ecolab, Gilead Sciences, GE Healthcare, Qiagen, Cerner, Illumina, Sanofi, Stericycle, Thermo Fisher Scientific, The Advisory Board Company, Novo Nordisk, Celgene, 3M
FiguresFig 1.
Predicted probabilities and 95% CIs…
Fig 1.
Predicted probabilities and 95% CIs of screening recommendations as a function of receipt…
Fig 1.Predicted probabilities and 95% CIs of screening recommendations as a function of receipt of reminders. Predicted probabilities are adjusted for being sued for failing to diagnose cancer, physician’s race/ethnicity, time since residency graduation, physician’s sex, full-time status in outpatient clinic, trusted guidelines, practice size, employer type, presence of an electronic medical record, physician’s specialty, percentage of patients uninsured/self-pay, and receipt of quality compensation.
Similar articlesAbou Leila RM, Shannon M, El-Nigoumi SE. Abou Leila RM, et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Aug;10(3):e001351. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001351. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 34433579 Free PMC article. Review.
Radhakrishnan A, Nowak SA, Parker AM, Visvanathan K, Pollack CE. Radhakrishnan A, et al. Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 17. Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 29155227 Free PMC article.
Martin K, Vogel RI, Nagler RH, Wyman JF, Raymond N, Teoh D, Allen AM, Talley KMC, Mason S, Blaes AH. Martin K, et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jan;29(1):91-99. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7436. Epub 2019 Jul 16. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 31314684 Free PMC article.
Corbelli J, Borrero S, Bonnema R, McNamara M, Kraemer K, Rubio D, Karpov I, McNeil M. Corbelli J, et al. Womens Health Issues. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):e313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003. Womens Health Issues. 2014. PMID: 24794545
Yong-Hing CJ, Gordon PB, Appavoo S, Fitzgerald SR, Seely JM. Yong-Hing CJ, et al. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023 May;74(2):388-397. doi: 10.1177/08465371221120798. Epub 2022 Sep 1. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023. PMID: 36048585 Review.
Nduka IJ, Ejie IL, Okafor CE, Eleje GU, Ekwunife OI. Nduka IJ, et al. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):e066928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066928. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36750281 Free PMC article.
Abou Leila RM, Shannon M, El-Nigoumi SE. Abou Leila RM, et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Aug;10(3):e001351. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001351. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 34433579 Free PMC article. Review.
Sayon-Orea C, Carlos S, Rico-Campà A, Fernández-Montero A, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Toledo E, Kales S, Martínez-González MA. Sayon-Orea C, et al. BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):e048498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048498. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35022167 Free PMC article.
Karasiewicz M, Chawłowska E, Lipiak A, Więckowska B. Karasiewicz M, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8492. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168492. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34444237 Free PMC article.
Smith J, Dodd RH, Gainey KM, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J, McCaffery KJ. Smith J, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):2998-3020. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. Epub 2023 May 4. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37142822 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3