Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Experiences of Using Publicly Available Physical Activity Mobile Apps: Qualitative StudyAnna L Roberts et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019.
. 2019 Jan 4;7(1):e10918. doi: 10.2196/10918. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Physical activity (PA) can improve a range of outcomes following a cancer diagnosis. These include an improvement in experience of side effects of treatment (eg, fatigue) and management of comorbid conditions. PA might also increase survival and reduce recurrence. Digital interventions have shown potential for PA promotion among cancer survivors, but most in a previous review were Web-based, and few studies used mobile apps. There are many PA apps available for general public use, but it is unclear whether these are suitable as a PA intervention after a cancer diagnosis.
Objective: This study sought posttreatment nonmetastatic breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors' opinions of using smartphone apps to promote PA and gathered their views on existing publicly available PA apps to inform a future intervention.
Methods: Each participant was randomly assigned to download 2 of 4 apps (Human, The Walk, The Johnson & Johnson Official 7 Minute Workout, and Gorilla Workout). Participants used each app for 1 week consecutively. In-depth semistructured telephone interviews were then conducted to understand participants' experiences of using the apps and how app-based PA interventions could be developed for cancer survivors. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: Thirty-two participants took part: 50% (16/32) had prostate cancer, 25% (8/32) had breast cancer, and 25% (8/32) had colorectal cancer. Three core themes were identified. The first theme was that multiple factors affect engagement with PA apps and this is highly personalized. Factors affecting engagement included participants' perceptions of (1) the advantages and disadvantages of using apps to support PA, (2) the relevance of the app to the user (eg, in terms of cancer-related factors, their PA goals, the difficulty level of the app, the way in which they interact with their mobile phone, and the extent to which the app fits with their self-identity), (3) the quality of the app (eg, usability, accuracy, quality of production, and scientific evidence-base), and (4) the behavior change techniques used to promote PA. In the second theme, participants recommended that apps that promote walking are most appealing, as walking removes many barriers to PA. Finally, the participants suggested that PA apps should be integrated into cancer care, as they valued guidance and recommendations from health care professionals.
Conclusions: This sample of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors was receptive to the use of apps to promote PA. Although no publicly available PA app was deemed wholly suitable, many suggestions for adaptation and intervention development were provided. The results can inform the development of an app-based PA intervention for cancer survivors. They also highlight the wide-ranging and dynamic influences on engagement with digital interventions, which can be applied to other evaluations of mobile health products in other health conditions and other health behaviors.
Keywords: cancer survivors; digital health; health behavior; mHealth; mobile apps; physical activity.
©Anna L Roberts, Henry WW Potts, Dimitrios A Koutoukidis, Lee Smith, Abigail Fisher. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 04.01.2019.
Conflict of interest statementConflicts of Interest: The authors have no personal financial interests related to the presented work. AF, HWWP, and LS currently work alongside Six to Start (the developers of the app, The Walk, used in this study) on an unrelated research project. HWWP has a current PhD student (unrelated to this study) who was employed by Johnson & Johnson and whose employment ceased before the beginning of this study. HWWP has received consultancy fees from Crystallise, System Analytic, and The HELP Trust and received funding from myownteam and Shift.ms. These relationships/activities were unrelated to the presented work or analyses. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
FiguresFigure 1
Screenshots of Human.
Figure 1
Screenshots of Human.
Figure 1Screenshots of Human.
Figure 2
Screenshots of The Walk.
Figure 2
Screenshots of The Walk.
Figure 2Screenshots of The Walk.
Figure 3
Screenshots of The Johnson &…
Figure 3
Screenshots of The Johnson & Johnson Official 7 Minute Workout (J&J).
Figure 3Screenshots of The Johnson & Johnson Official 7 Minute Workout (J&J).
Figure 4
Screenshots of Gorilla Workout.
Figure 4
Screenshots of Gorilla Workout.
Figure 4Screenshots of Gorilla Workout.
Similar articlesMonteiro-Guerra F, Signorelli GR, Rivera-Romero O, Dorronzoro-Zubiete E, Caulfield B. Monteiro-Guerra F, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 21;8(9):e18867. doi: 10.2196/18867. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32955446 Free PMC article.
Roberts AL, Potts HWW, Stevens C, Lally P, Smith L, Fisher A. Roberts AL, et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Oct;13(5):815-828. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00801-w. Epub 2019 Sep 2. J Cancer Surviv. 2019. PMID: 31475306 Free PMC article.
Puszkiewicz P, Roberts AL, Smith L, Wardle J, Fisher A. Puszkiewicz P, et al. JMIR Cancer. 2016 May 31;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5380. JMIR Cancer. 2016. PMID: 28410168 Free PMC article.
Corbett T, Singh K, Payne L, Bradbury K, Foster C, Watson E, Richardson A, Little P, Yardley L. Corbett T, et al. Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):22-33. doi: 10.1002/pon.4566. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Psychooncology. 2018. PMID: 29044832 Review.
Saevarsdottir SR, Gudmundsdottir SL. Saevarsdottir SR, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 26;25:e42852. doi: 10.2196/42852. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37494111 Free PMC article. Review.
Dinari F, Bahaadinbeigy K, Moulaei K, Nemati A, Ershad Sarabi R. Dinari F, et al. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Feb 26;36:14. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.14. eCollection 2022. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022. PMID: 35991156 Free PMC article.
Haberlin C, O' Donnell DM, Moran J, Broderick J. Haberlin C, et al. JMIR Cancer. 2020 Apr 28;6(1):e16469. doi: 10.2196/16469. JMIR Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32343259 Free PMC article.
Kelley MM, Kue J, Brophy L, Peabody AL, Foraker RE, Yen PY, Tucker S. Kelley MM, et al. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Jun 2;39(11):755-763. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000781. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021. PMID: 34074873 Free PMC article. Review.
Bergevi J, Andermo S, Woldamanuel Y, Johansson UB, Hagströmer M, Rossen J. Bergevi J, et al. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 28;9(2):e34278. doi: 10.2196/34278. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 35763339 Free PMC article. Review.
Lewis-Thames MW, Strayhorn SM, Molina Y, Nolan TS. Lewis-Thames MW, et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Dec;14(6):806-825. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00894-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8. J Cancer Surviv. 2020. PMID: 32514908 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3