A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29854137/ below:

A Cross-Sectional Study of Prominent US Mobile Health Applications: Evaluating the Current Landscape

. 2018 Apr 16:2017:715-723. eCollection 2017. A Cross-Sectional Study of Prominent US Mobile Health Applications: Evaluating the Current Landscape

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

A Cross-Sectional Study of Prominent US Mobile Health Applications: Evaluating the Current Landscape

Pierre-Antoine Fougerouse et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018.

. 2018 Apr 16:2017:715-723. eCollection 2017. Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) could offer unprecedented opportunity to provide medical support closer to the users. We have selected some relevant criteria to describe 100 apps from Google Play store and Apple's App Store's top suggestions in medical category. These characteristics were compared based on the paid or free nature of the apps, the target users: consumers or healthcare professionals, and the platform: Android or iOS. Seventeen provided functionalities and 27 medical subjects covered by these apps were also extracted. Our study shows that even in top rated mHealth apps, a high proportion lacks some basic criteria regarding the quality of the apps including the presence of a privacy policy, describing content sources, participation of the target users in the app development, etc. Paid apps did not ensure better quality compared to free apps. The current mHealth market is not mature enough to be used widely and recommended by healthcare professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Distributions of applications in different…

Figure 1.

Distributions of applications in different subjects. (HP: Healthcare Professionals, C: Consumers)

Figure 1.

Distributions of applications in different subjects. (HP: Healthcare Professionals, C: Consumers)

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boulos MNK, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform. 2014;5(3):229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yasini M, Marchand G. Toward a use case based classification of mobile health applications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:175–9. - PubMed
    1. research2guidance - The mHealth apps market is getting crowded. [Internet] [cited 2017 Feb 28]. Available from: https://research2guidance.com/mhealth-app-market-getting-crowded-259000-...
    1. Becker S, Miron-Shatz T, Schumacher N, Krocza J, Diamantidis C, Albrecht U-V. mHealth 2.0: Experiences, Possibilities, and Perspectives. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2014;2(2):e24. - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3