Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Completing the cervical screening pathway: Factors that facilitate the increase of self-collection uptake among under-screened and never-screened women, an Australian pilot studyE McLachlan et al. Curr Oncol. 2018 Feb.
. 2018 Feb;25(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3916. Epub 2018 Feb 28. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjectives: To examine factors that enhance under-screened and never-screened women's completion of the self-collection alternative pathway of the Renewed National Cervical Screening Program (ncsp) in Victoria, Australia.
Background: With the Australian ncsp changing, starting on 1 December 2017, the Medical Services Advisory Committee (msac) recommended implementing human papillomavirus (hpv) testing using a self-collected sample for under-screened and never-screened populations. In response, a multi-agency group implemented an hpv self-collection pilot project to trial self-collection screening pathways for eligible women.
Methods: Quantitative data were collected on participation rates and compliance rates with follow-up procedures across three primary health care settings. Forty women who self-collected were interviewed in a semi-structured format, and seven agency staff completed in-depth interviews. Qualitative data were used to identify and understand clinical and personal enablers that assisted women to complete self-collection cervical screening pathways successfully.
Results: Eighty-five per cent (10 women) of participants who tested positive for hpv successfully received their results and completed follow-up procedures as required. Two remaining participants also received hpv-positive results. However, agencies were unable to engage them in follow-up services and procedures. The overall participation rate in screening (self-collection or Pap test) was 85.7% (84 women), with 79 women self-collecting. Qualitative data indicated that clear explanations on self-collection, development of trusting, empathetic relationships with health professionals, and recognition of participants' past experiences were critical to the successful completion of the self-collection pathway. When asked about possible inhibitors to screening and to following up on results and appointments, women cited poor physical and mental health, as well as financial and other structural barriers.
Conclusion: A well-implemented process, led by trusted, knowledgeable, and engaged health care professionals who can provide appropriate support and information, can assist under-screened and never-screened women to complete the hpv self-collection pathway successfully.
Keywords: cervical screening; cultural and linguistically diverse; hpv self-collection; indigenous; women.
FiguresFIGURE 1
Overview of the self-collection screening…
FIGURE 1
Overview of the self-collection screening pathway. *This pilot was implemented before Renewal when…
FIGURE 1Overview of the self-collection screening pathway. *This pilot was implemented before Renewal when the National Cervical Screening Program recommended Pap tests every two years for women aged 18 to 69 years. **Recommended but not necessarily implemented upon Renewal. This action was specifically taken to oversee the pilot project. ***Under-screened women in Renewal will be defined as aged 30 to 74 years and two years over the routine screening interval of five years. ****Under Renewal, a CST will be offered (a practitioner-administered hpv test). CST = cervical screening test; HPV = human papillomavirus
FIGURE 2
Participation rates, results, and compliance…
FIGURE 2
Participation rates, results, and compliance with follow-up procedures. This figure shows the number…
FIGURE 2Participation rates, results, and compliance with follow-up procedures. This figure shows the number of women who were invited to participate in self-collection, the results that were received, and the numbers of participants that continued through follow-up procedures (LBC, colposcopy, and repeat self-collection). *Recommended routine screening interval of five years with CST. ** Were recalled; however could not be engaged in follow-up. ***Variation of the screening pathway as women were allowed to repeat self-collection rather than the recommended speculum examination (LBC). CST = cervical screening test; HPV = human papillomavirus; LBC = liquid-based cytology; Not 16/18 = HPV types that are either non-cancer causing, or much less likely to cause cancer; 16/18 = 70% of cervical cancer and pre-cancerous lesions are caused by HPV types 16 or 18; LSIL = low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL = high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Negative = no cancerous cells detected.
Similar articlesCreagh NS, Zammit C, Brotherton JM, Saville M, McDermott T, Nightingale C, Kelaher M. Creagh NS, et al. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455065221075905. doi: 10.1177/17455065221075905. Womens Health (Lond). 2022. PMID: 35147064 Free PMC article.
Saville M, Hawkes D, Mclachlan E, Anderson S, Arabena K. Saville M, et al. Curr Oncol. 2018 Feb;25(1):e27-e32. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3915. Epub 2018 Feb 28. Curr Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29507492 Free PMC article.
Sultana F, English DR, Simpson JA, Brotherton JM, Drennan K, Mullins R, Heley S, Wrede CD, Saville M, Gertig DM. Sultana F, et al. BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 19;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-207. BMC Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24646201 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Nagendiram A, Bougher H, Banks J, Hall L, Heal C. Nagendiram A, et al. Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Sep;31(3):343-353. doi: 10.1002/hpja.280. Epub 2019 Aug 7. Health Promot J Austr. 2020. PMID: 31353682 Review.
Camara H, Zhang Y, Lafferty L, Vallely AJ, Guy R, Kelly-Hanku A. Camara H, et al. BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):1503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11554-6. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34348689 Free PMC article. Review.
Palmer MR, Saito E, Katanoda K, Sakamoto H, Hocking JS, Brotherton JML, Ong JJ. Palmer MR, et al. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Feb 19;44:101018. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101018. eCollection 2024 Mar. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024. PMID: 38404421 Free PMC article.
Creagh NS, Zammit C, Brotherton JM, Saville M, McDermott T, Nightingale C, Kelaher M. Creagh NS, et al. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455065221075905. doi: 10.1177/17455065221075905. Womens Health (Lond). 2022. PMID: 35147064 Free PMC article.
Rebolj M, Sargent A, Njor SH, Cuschieri K. Rebolj M, et al. Int J Cancer. 2023 Jul 1;153(1):8-19. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34358. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Int J Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36385698 Free PMC article. Review.
Butler TL, Lee N, Anderson K, Brotherton JML, Cunningham J, Condon JR, Garvey G, Tong A, Moore SP, Maher CM, Mein JK, Warren EF, Whop LJ. Butler TL, et al. PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0271658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271658. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36044466 Free PMC article.
Camara H, Nosi S, Munnull G, Badman SG, Bolgna J, Kuk J, Mola G, Guy R, Vallely AJ, Kelly-Hanku A. Camara H, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):1514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08842-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 36510192 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3