Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Associations of County-level Radiologist and Mammography Facility Supply with Screening Mammography Rates in the United StatesAndrew B Rosenkrantz et al. Acad Radiol. 2018 Jul.
. 2018 Jul;25(7):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.023. Epub 2018 Jan 17. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractRationale and objectives: The present study aims to assess associations of Medicare beneficiary screening mammography rates with local mammography facility and radiologist availability.
Materials and methods: Mammography screening rates for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were obtained for US counties using the County Health Rankings data set. County-level certified mammography facility counts were obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration. County-level mammogram-interpreting radiologist and breast imaging subspecialist counts were determined using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee-for-service claims files. Spearman correlations and multivariable linear regressions were performed using counties' facility and radiologist counts, as well as counts normalized to counties' Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary volume and land area.
Results: Across 3035 included counties, average screening mammography rates were 60.5% ± 8.2% (range 26%-88%). Correlations between county-level screening rates and total mammography facilities, facilities per 100,000 square mile county area, total mammography-interpreting radiologists, and mammography-interpreting radiologists per 100,000 county-level Medicare beneficiaries were all weak (r = 0.22-0.26). Correlations between county-level screening rates and mammography rates per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries, total breast imaging subspecialist radiologists, and breast imaging subspecialist radiologists per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries were all minimal (r = 0.06-0.16). Multivariable analyses overall demonstrated radiologist supply to have a stronger independent effect than facility supply, although effect sizes remained weak for both.
Conclusion: Mammography facility and radiologist supply-side factors are only weakly associated with county-level Medicare beneficiary screening mammography rates, and as such, screening mammography may differ from many other health-care services. Although efforts to enhance facility and radiologist supply may be helpful, initiatives to improve screening mammography rates should focus more on demand-side factors, such as patient education and primary care physician education and access.
Keywords: Medicare; Screening mammography; geographic variation; health policy; physician supply.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articlesRosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Duszak R Jr. Rosenkrantz AB, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):601-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.007. Epub 2018 Jan 2. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29305075
Heller SL, Rosenkrantz AB, Gao Y, Moy L. Heller SL, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Sep;211(3):624-629. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19541. Epub 2018 Jul 17. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 30016143
Engelman KK, Hawley DB, Gazaway R, Mosier MC, Ahluwalia JS, Ellerbeck EF. Engelman KK, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jan;50(1):62-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50009.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002. PMID: 12028248
Funaro K, Ataya D, Niell B. Funaro K, et al. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021 Jan;59(1):41-55. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021. PMID: 33222999 Review.
Ventura-Alfaro CE. Ventura-Alfaro CE. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2018 Jul-Aug;20(4):518-522. doi: 10.15446/rsap.V20n4.52035. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2018. PMID: 30843990 Review. Spanish.
Huang T, Ekenga CC. Huang T, et al. Prev Med Rep. 2025 Mar 4;52:103026. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103026. eCollection 2025 Apr. Prev Med Rep. 2025. PMID: 40160970 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3