Review
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5. Epub 2017 Dec 11. Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trialsCollaborators
CollaboratorsItem in Clipboard
Review
Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trialsEarly Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5. Epub 2017 Dec 11. CollaboratorsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for early breast cancer can make breast-conserving surgery more feasible and might be more likely to eradicate micrometastatic disease than might the same chemotherapy given after surgery. We investigated the long-term benefits and risks of NACT and the influence of tumour characteristics on outcome with a collaborative meta-analysis of individual patient data from relevant randomised trials.
Methods: We obtained information about prerandomisation tumour characteristics, clinical tumour response, surgery, recurrence, and mortality for 4756 women in ten randomised trials in early breast cancer that began before 2005 and compared NACT with the same chemotherapy given postoperatively. Primary outcomes were tumour response, extent of local therapy, local and distant recurrence, breast cancer death, and overall mortality. Analyses by intention-to-treat used standard regression (for response and frequency of breast-conserving therapy) and log-rank methods (for recurrence and mortality).
Findings: Patients entered the trials from 1983 to 2002 and median follow-up was 9 years (IQR 5-14), with the last follow-up in 2013. Most chemotherapy was anthracycline based (3838 [81%] of 4756 women). More than two thirds (1349 [69%] of 1947) of women allocated NACT had a complete or partial clinical response. Patients allocated NACT had an increased frequency of breast-conserving therapy (1504 [65%] of 2320 treated with NACT vs 1135 [49%] of 2318 treated with adjuvant chemotherapy). NACT was associated with more frequent local recurrence than was adjuvant chemotherapy: the 15 year local recurrence was 21·4% for NACT versus 15·9% for adjuvant chemotherapy (5·5% increase [95% CI 2·4-8·6]; rate ratio 1·37 [95% CI 1·17-1·61]; p=0·0001). No significant difference between NACT and adjuvant chemotherapy was noted for distant recurrence (15 year risk 38·2% for NACT vs 38·0% for adjuvant chemotherapy; rate ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·92-1·14]; p=0·66), breast cancer mortality (34·4% vs 33·7%; 1·06 [0·95-1·18]; p=0·31), or death from any cause (40·9% vs 41·2%; 1·04 [0·94-1·15]; p=0·45).
Interpretation: Tumours downsized by NACT might have higher local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy than might tumours of the same dimensions in women who have not received NACT. Strategies to mitigate the increased local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in tumours downsized by NACT should be considered-eg, careful tumour localisation, detailed pathological assessment, and appropriate radiotherapy.
Funding: Cancer Research UK, British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and UK Department of Health.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
FiguresFigure 1
BCT rate ratios Numbers with…
Figure 1
BCT rate ratios Numbers with BCT or mastectomy after chemotherapy. Excludes local therapy…
Figure 1BCT rate ratios Numbers with BCT or mastectomy after chemotherapy. Excludes local therapy unknown (67 patients with NACT and 51 with adjuvant chemotherapies). BCT=breast-conserving therapy. ER=oestrogen receptor. PR=progesterone receptor. NACT=neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Figure 2
Effect of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant…
Figure 2
Effect of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence and mortality Local recurrence (A),…
Figure 2Effect of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence and mortality Local recurrence (A), distant recurrence (B), breast cancer mortality (C), and death from any cause (D). Three trials recorded causes of any deaths but only the first breast cancer event. Hence, for these trials, distant recurrence includes the first distant recurrence as the first event and death from breast cancer. Error bars are 95% CIs. NACT=neoadjuvant chemotherapy. O–E=observed minus expected. RR=rate ratio. V=variance of O–E.
Figure 3
Time to recurrence and breast…
Figure 3
Time to recurrence and breast cancer mortality Local recurrence for surgery commonly used…
Figure 3Time to recurrence and breast cancer mortality Local recurrence for surgery commonly used (A) and less commonly used (B), distant recurrence for surgery commonly used (C) and less commonly used (D), and breast cancer mortality for surgery commonly used (E) and less commonly used (F). Heterogeneity by surgery use: local recurrence p=0·19, distant recurrence p=0·29, and breast cancer mortality p=0·24. Error bars are 95% CIs. NACT=neoadjuvant chemotherapy. O–E=observed minus expected. RR=rate ratio. V=variance of O–E. Three trials recorded causes of any deaths but only the first breast cancer event. Hence, for these trials, distant recurrence includes the first distant recurrence as the first event and death from breast cancer. *Includes Institut Bergonié Bordeaux (in NACT group, 33% had radiotherapy alone) and Institut Curie S6 (in NACT group, 51% had radiotherapy alone; in adjuvant chemotherapy group, 46% had radiotherapy alone) trials.
Figure 4
Rate ratios for the effect…
Figure 4
Rate ratios for the effect of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence by…
Figure 4Rate ratios for the effect of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence by trial (A) Local recurrence. (B) Distant recurrence. Three trials recorded causes of any deaths but only the first breast cancer event. Hence, for these trials, distant recurrence includes the first distant recurrence as the first event and death from breast cancer. The appendix (pp 3–4) contains a full description of each trial's chemotherapy regimen. A=doxorubicin (adriamycin). BCCA=British Columbia Cancer Agency. BCSG=Breast Cancer Study Group. C=cyclophosphamide. E=epirubicin. ECTO=European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. EORTC=European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. F=fluorouracil. Fol=folinic acid. IB=Institut Bergonié. M=methotrexate. Mit=mitomycin-C. Mz=mitoxantrone. NCI=National Cancer Institute. NSABP=National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. O–E=observed minus expected. P=paclitaxel. Tt=thiotepa. Vc=vincristine. Vd=vindesine. *Chemotherapy regimens given preoperatively in those allocated neoadjuvant and postoperatively in those allocated adjuvant chemotherapy. The number of cycles, agents, and drug doses (in mg/m2) per cycle are given. †The Austrian BCSG VII trial8 has two entries to take into account the two postoperative chemotherapies given to both randomised groups (appendix pp 3–4).
Figure 5
Local recurrence rate ratios For…
Figure 5
Local recurrence rate ratios For lumpectomy versus mastectomy, χ 2 1 =3·3; p=0·07.…
Figure 5Local recurrence rate ratios For lumpectomy versus mastectomy, χ21=3·3; p=0·07. ER=oestrogen receptor. PR=progesterone receptor. *408 women with missing data had planned local therapy imputed (appendix p 9). †Refers to Institut Curie S6 (appendix p 9).
Figure 6
Clinical complete response rate ratios…
Figure 6
Clinical complete response rate ratios Three trials are excluded, as individual responses are…
Figure 6Clinical complete response rate ratios Three trials are excluded, as individual responses are not available; 440 women have missing clinical response data. CIs are group specific. Rate ratios are scaled such that, within each category, their inverse variance-weighted sum is 1—ie, ratios are with respect to the mean CR. The appendix (p 6) contains data available for each trial. CR=complete response. ER=oestrogen receptor. PR=progesterone receptor.
Comment inDerks MGM, van de Velde CJH. Derks MGM, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):2-3. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30914-2. Epub 2017 Dec 11. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29242042 No abstract available.
Charalampoudis P, Karakatsanis A. Charalampoudis P, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):e128. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30115-3. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29508753 No abstract available.
Krug D, Loibl S. Krug D, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):e129. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30118-9. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29508754 No abstract available.
McGale P, Dodwell D, Taylor C, Gray R; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. McGale P, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):e130. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30120-7. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29508755 No abstract available.
Kunkler IH, Williams LJ, Jack WJ, Cameron DA, Dixon JM; PRIME II investigators. Kunkler IH, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):266-73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71221-5. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25637340 Clinical Trial.
Cheun JH, Kwak Y, Kang E, Jung JJ, Kim HK, Lee HB, Lee KH, Moon HG, Hwang KT, Park YH, Lee JE, Han W. Cheun JH, et al. Breast. 2024 Dec;78:103828. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103828. Epub 2024 Oct 29. Breast. 2024. PMID: 39515238 Free PMC article.
Williams LJ, Kunkler IH, Taylor KJ, Dunlop J, Piper T, Caldwell J, Jack W, Loane JF, Elder K, Bartlett JMS, Dixon JM, Cameron DA. Williams LJ, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Sep;25(9):1213-1221. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00347-4. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Lancet Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39127062 Clinical Trial.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG); Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Davies C, Ewertz M, Godwin J, Gray R, Pierce L, Whelan T, Wang Y, Peto R. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), et al. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 22019144 Free PMC article. Review.
Clarke MJ. Clarke MJ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD000487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000487.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18843612 Free PMC article. Review.
Trimboli RM, Giorgi Rossi P, Battisti NML, Cozzi A, Magni V, Zanardo M, Sardanelli F. Trimboli RM, et al. Insights Imaging. 2020 Sep 25;11(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00905-3. Insights Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32975658 Free PMC article. Review.
Xu L, Liu Y, Fan Z, Jiang Z, Liu Y, Ling R, Zhang J, Yu Z, Jin F, Wang C, Cui S, Wang S, Mao D, Han B, Wang T, Zhang G, Wang T, Guo B, Yu L, Xu Y, Fu F, Liu Z, Wang S, Luo K, Xiang Q, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Zhou B, Liu Z, Ma C, Tong W, Mao J, Duan X, Cui Y. Xu L, et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 16;11:606477. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.606477. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33796452 Free PMC article.
Pan HY, Zhang Q, Wu WJ, Li X. Pan HY, et al. World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jul 26;10(21):7293-7301. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7293. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 36158032 Free PMC article.
Parisi F, Razeti MG, Blondeaux E, Arecco L, Perachino M, Tagliamento M, Levaggi A, Fregatti P, Poggio F, Lambertini M. Parisi F, et al. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2020 Jun 29;14:1179554920931816. doi: 10.1177/1179554920931816. eCollection 2020. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32647477 Free PMC article.
Wankhade D, Gharde P, Dutta S. Wankhade D, et al. Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49742. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38161817 Free PMC article. Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3