Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29101973/ below:

Patient-Centered Radiology Reporting: Using Online Crowdsourcing to Assess the Effectiveness of a Web-Based Interactive Radiology Report

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: ryan.short@duke.edu.
• ² Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
• ³ Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

• PMID: 29101973
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.027

Item in Clipboard

Ryan G Short et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov.

• ¹ Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: ryan.short@duke.edu.
• ² Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
• ³ Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

• PMID: 29101973
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.027

Item in Clipboard

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-centered web-based interactive mammography report.

Methods: A survey was distributed on Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform. One hundred ninety-three US women ≥18 years of age were surveyed and then randomized to one of three simulated BI-RADS^® 0 report formats: standard report, Mammography Quality Standards Act-modeled patient letter, or web-based interactive report. Survey questions assessed participants' report comprehension, satisfaction with and perception of the interpreting radiologist, and experience with the presented report. Two-tailed t tests and χ² tests were used to evaluate differences among groups.

Results: Participants in the interactive web-based group spent more than double the time viewing the report than the standard report group (160.0 versus 64.2 seconds, P < .001). Report comprehension scores were significantly higher for the interactive web-based and patient letter groups than the standard report group (P < .05). Scores of satisfaction with the interpreting radiologist were significantly higher for the web-based interactive report and patient letter groups than the standard report group (P < .01). There were no significant differences between the patient letter and web-based interactive report groups.

Conclusions: Radiology report format likely influences communication effectiveness. For result communication to a non-medical patient audience, patient-centric report formats, such as a Mammography Quality Standards Act-modeled patient letter or web-based interactive report, may offer advantages over the standard radiology report. Future work is needed to determine if these findings are reproducible in patient care settings and to determine how best to optimize radiology result communication to patients.

Keywords: Patient-centered; crowdsourcing; mammography.

Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

• Use of an Online Crowdsourcing Platform to Assess Patient Comprehension of Radiology Reports and Colloquialisms.

  Cho JK, Zafar HM, Cook TS. Cho JK, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1316-1320. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22202. Epub 2020 Mar 24. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32208006

• The "open letter": radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals.

  Bruno MA, Petscavage-Thomas JM, Mohr MJ, Bell SK, Brown SD. Bruno MA, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 May 16. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24836272

• Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value.

  Sadigh G, Hertweck T, Kao C, Wood P, Hughes D, Henry TS, Duszak R Jr. Sadigh G, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 May;12(5):519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.009. Epub 2015 Jan 23. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25622764

• Online Portals: Gateway to Patient-Centered Radiology.

  Gefen R, Bruno MA, Abujudeh HH. Gefen R, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):987-991. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18291. Epub 2017 Jul 20. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28726503 Review.

• Maximizing Value Through Innovations in Radiologist-Driven Communications in Breast Imaging.

  Lee CI, Lee JM. Lee CI, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):1001-1005. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18410. Epub 2017 Jul 20. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28726506 Review.

• Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.

  Williamson S, Patterson J, Crosby R, Johnson R, Sandhu H, Johnson S, Jenkins J, Casey M, Kearins O, Taylor-Phillips S. Williamson S, et al. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 29;13:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.016. eCollection 2019 Mar. Prev Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 30666286 Free PMC article. Review.

• Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review.

  Alarifi M, Patrick T, Jabour A, Wu M, Luo J. Alarifi M, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 22;17(10):3673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103673. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32456099 Free PMC article. Review.

• Artificial Intelligence to Improve Patient Understanding of Radiology Reports.

  Amin K, Khosla P, Doshi R, Chheang S, Forman HP. Amin K, et al. Yale J Biol Med. 2023 Sep 29;96(3):407-417. doi: 10.59249/NKOY5498. eCollection 2023 Sep. Yale J Biol Med. 2023. PMID: 37780992 Free PMC article. Review.

• Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review.

  Wang C, Han L, Stein G, Day S, Bien-Gund C, Mathews A, Ong JJ, Zhao PZ, Wei SF, Walker J, Chou R, Lee A, Chen A, Bayus B, Tucker JD. Wang C, et al. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Jan 20;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-0622-9. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020. PMID: 31959234 Free PMC article.

• Information transparency with immediate release: Oncology clinician and patient perceptions.

  O'Brien E, Vemuru S, Leonard L, Himelhoch B, Adams M, Taft N, Jaiswal K, Sams S, Cumbler E, Wolverton D, Ahrendt G, Yi J, Lin CT, Miles R, Hampanda K, Tevis S. O'Brien E, et al. Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Am J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37863801 Free PMC article.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3