Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Depression Screening Using Daily Mental-Health Ratings from a Smartphone Application for Breast Cancer PatientsJunetae Kim et al. J Med Internet Res. 2016.
Authors Junetae Kim 1 , Sanghee Lim, Yul Ha Min, Yong-Wook Shin, Byungtae Lee, Guiyun Sohn, Kyung Hae Jung, Jae-Ho Lee, Byung Ho Son, Sei Hyun Ahn, Soo-Yong Shin, Jong Won Lee AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Mobile mental-health trackers are mobile phone apps that gather self-reported mental-health ratings from users. They have received great attention from clinicians as tools to screen for depression in individual patients. While several apps that ask simple questions using face emoticons have been developed, there has been no study examining the validity of their screening performance.
Objective: In this study, we (1) evaluate the potential of a mobile mental-health tracker that uses three daily mental-health ratings (sleep satisfaction, mood, and anxiety) as indicators for depression, (2) discuss three approaches to data processing (ratio, average, and frequency) for generating indicator variables, and (3) examine the impact of adherence on reporting using a mobile mental-health tracker and accuracy in depression screening.
Methods: We analyzed 5792 sets of daily mental-health ratings collected from 78 breast cancer patients over a 48-week period. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as the measure of true depression status, we conducted a random-effect logistic panel regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the screening performance of the mobile mental-health tracker. In addition, we classified patients into two subgroups based on their adherence level (higher adherence and lower adherence) using a k-means clustering algorithm and compared the screening accuracy between the two groups.
Results: With the ratio approach, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.8012, indicating that the performance of depression screening using daily mental-health ratings gathered via mobile mental-health trackers is comparable to the results of PHQ-9 tests. Also, the AUC is significantly higher (P=.002) for the higher adherence group (AUC=0.8524) than for the lower adherence group (AUC=0.7234). This result shows that adherence to self-reporting is associated with a higher accuracy of depression screening.
Conclusions: Our results support the potential of a mobile mental-health tracker as a tool for screening for depression in practice. Also, this study provides clinicians with a guideline for generating indicator variables from daily mental-health ratings. Furthermore, our results provide empirical evidence for the critical role of adherence to self-reporting, which represents crucial information for both doctors and patients.
Keywords: breast cancer (neoplasms); depression; mental health; smartphone applications.
Conflict of interest statementConflicts of Interest: None declared.
FiguresFigure 1
Three mental logs in the…
Figure 1
Three mental logs in the Pit-a-Pat app: (A) Sleep satisfaction, (B) Mood, and…
Figure 1Three mental logs in the Pit-a-Pat app: (A) Sleep satisfaction, (B) Mood, and (C) Anxiety.
Figure 2
Illustration of data conversion from…
Figure 2
Illustration of data conversion from daily mental-health logs into biweekly indicators with frequency…
Figure 2Illustration of data conversion from daily mental-health logs into biweekly indicators with frequency and ratio approaches: (A) Daily scores of sleep quality during 2 weeks, (B) assigned scores of 1 to the days when the reported score is higher than the cut-off value, (C) calculated scores in a biweekly format.
Figure 3
Results of ROC analysis: (A)…
Figure 3
Results of ROC analysis: (A) ROC curves calculated from three models (full samples),…
Figure 3Results of ROC analysis: (A) ROC curves calculated from three models (full samples), (B) ROC curves calculated from three models (subsample excluding the daily logs reported on the day the PHQ-9 is administered).
Figure 4
Graphs for ROC comparisons of…
Figure 4
Graphs for ROC comparisons of subsamples by adherence level: (A) ROCs by adherence…
Figure 4Graphs for ROC comparisons of subsamples by adherence level: (A) ROCs by adherence levels with the ratio approach, (B) ROCs by adherence levels with the average approach, (C) ROCs by adherence levels with the frequency model.
Similar articlesMin YH, Lee JW, Shin YW, Jo MW, Sohn G, Lee JH, Lee G, Jung KH, Sung J, Ko BS, Yu JH, Kim HJ, Son BH, Ahn SH. Min YH, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 23;16(5):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3421. J Med Internet Res. 2014. PMID: 24860070 Free PMC article.
BinDhim NF, Shaman AM, Trevena L, Basyouni MH, Pont LG, Alhawassi TM. BinDhim NF, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002840. Epub 2014 Oct 17. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015. PMID: 25326599 Free PMC article.
Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Proudfoot J, Christensen H. Nicholas J, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 17;17(8):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4581. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 26283290 Free PMC article. Review.
Rathbone AL, Prescott J. Rathbone AL, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7740. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28838887 Free PMC article. Review.
Houghton LC, Howland RE, McDonald JA. Houghton LC, et al. Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;7:298. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00298. eCollection 2019. Front Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31781525 Free PMC article.
Lee YJ, Park KS. Lee YJ, et al. Clin Endosc. 2017 Sep;50(5):412-414. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.139. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Clin Endosc. 2017. PMID: 29017291 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Kim DH, Lee Y, Oh JS, Seo DW, Lee KH, Kim YH, Kim WS, Lee JH. Kim DH, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;10(1):53. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010053. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 35052217 Free PMC article.
Yang YS, Ryu GW, Choi M. Yang YS, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 1;7(4):e11215. doi: 10.2196/11215. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30932866 Free PMC article.
Chung IY, Jung M, Lee SB, Lee JW, Park YR, Cho D, Chung H, Youn S, Min YH, Park HJ, Lee M, Chung S, Son BH, Ahn SH. Chung IY, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 6;21(9):13463. doi: 10.2196/13463. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31493319 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3