Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27329204/ below:

Development and Testing of an Automated 4-Day Text Messaging Guidance as an Aid for Improving Colonoscopy Preparation

Affiliations

• ¹ II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, München, Germany. Benjamin.walter@lrz.tum.de.

• PMID: 27329204
• PMCID: PMC4933803
• DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.5289

Item in Clipboard

Benjamin Michael Walter et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016.

• ¹ II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, München, Germany. Benjamin.walter@lrz.tum.de.

• PMID: 27329204
• PMCID: PMC4933803
• DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.5289

Item in Clipboard

Background: In gastroenterology a sufficient colon cleansing improves adenoma detection rate and prevents the need for preterm repeat colonoscopies due to invalid preparation. It has been shown that patient education is of major importance for improvement of colon cleansing.

Objective: Objective of this study was to assess the function of an automated text messaging (short message service, SMS)-supported colonoscopy preparation starting 4 days before colonoscopy appointment.

Methods: After preevaluation to assess mobile phone usage in the patient population for relevance of this approach, a Web-based, automated SMS text messaging system was developed, following which a single-center feasibility study at a tertiary care center was performed. Patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy were invited to participate. Patients enrolled in the study group received automated information about dietary recommendations and bowel cleansing during colonoscopy preparation. Data of outpatient colonoscopies with regular preparation procedure were used for pair matching and served as control. Primary end point was feasibility of SMS text messaging support in colonoscopy preparation assessed as stable and satisfactory function of the system. Secondary end points were quality of bowel preparation according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and patient satisfaction with SMS text messaging-provided information assessed by a questionnaire.

Results: Web-based SMS text messaging-supported colonoscopy preparation was successful and feasible in 19 of 20 patients. Mean (standard error of the mean, SEM) total BBPS score was slightly higher in the SMS group than in the control group (7.3, SEM 0.3 vs 6.4, SEM 0.2) and for each colonic region (left, transverse, and right colon). Patient satisfaction regarding SMS text messaging-based information was high.

Conclusions: Using SMS for colonoscopy preparation with 4 days' guidance including dietary recommendation is a new approach to improve colonoscopy preparation. Quality of colonoscopy preparation was sufficient and patients were highly satisfied with the system during colonoscopy preparation.

Keywords: colonoscopy; colonoscopy preparation; patient education; short message service.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflicts of Interest: Software support for the study was received from SmartPatient GmbH, Munich, Germany. SmartPatient GmbH did not participate in study design, data collection, data analysis, or manuscript preparation.

Graphical workflow of the text…

Graphical workflow of the text messaging (short message service, SMS)-guided colonoscopy preparation; examples…

Graphical workflow of the text messaging (short message service, SMS)-guided colonoscopy preparation; examples of SMS text messages.

Average Boston Bowel Preparation Scale…

Average Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score in the short message service (SMS)…

Average Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score in the short message service (SMS) study group was significantly higher in comparison with the control group (7.3 vs 6.4, P=.035). BBPS: 0, minimum to 9, maximum.

The average Boston Bowel Preparation…

The average Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score (0, minimum to 3, maximum)…

The average Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score (0, minimum to 3, maximum) split for each colon region. SMS: short message service; n.s.: not significant.

• Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).

  Walter B, Klare P, Strehle K, Aschenbeck J, Ludwig L, Dikopoulos N, Mayr M, Neu B, Hann A, Mayer B, Meining A, von Delius S. Walter B, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):506-513.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 21. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30138612 Clinical Trial.

• Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study.

  Lee YJ, Kim ES, Choi JH, Lee KI, Park KS, Cho KB, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS. Lee YJ, et al. Endoscopy. 2015 Nov;47(11):1018-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392406. Epub 2015 Jul 16. Endoscopy. 2015. PMID: 26182387 Clinical Trial.

• Effect of WeChat and short message service on bowel preparation: an endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

  Wang SL, Wang Q, Yao J, Zhao SB, Wang LS, Li ZS, Bai Y. Wang SL, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001303. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30418256 Clinical Trial.

• Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials.

  Tian X, Yi LJ, Han Y, Chen H, Liu XL, Chen WQ, Jiménez-Herrera MF. Tian X, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e19915. doi: 10.2196/19915. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34694227 Free PMC article. Review.

• Enhanced education for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: A state-of-the-art review.

  Liu Z, Zhang MM, Li YY, Li LX, Li YQ. Liu Z, et al. J Dig Dis. 2017 Feb;18(2):84-91. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12446. J Dig Dis. 2017. PMID: 28067463 Review.

• Implementing a multilevel intervention to accelerate colorectal cancer screening and follow-up in federally qualified health centers using a stepped wedge design: a study protocol.

  Kim K, Polite B, Hedeker D, Liebovitz D, Randal F, Jayaprakash M, Quinn M, Lee SM, Lam H. Kim K, et al. Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 29;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01045-4. Implement Sci. 2020. PMID: 33121536 Free PMC article.

• Alleviating Pregastroscopy Anxiety Using Mobile Social Media Application.

  Lu D, Wang JH, Lu C, Liu ZL, Jain A, Ji F, Gu Q. Lu D, et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 22;9:855892. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.855892. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35814771 Free PMC article.

• What Patients Want in a Smartphone App That Supports Colonoscopy Preparation: Qualitative Study to Inform a User-Centered Smartphone App.

  Sewitch MJ, Fallone CA, Ghali P, Lee GE. Sewitch MJ, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 2;7(7):e12242. doi: 10.2196/12242. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31125310 Free PMC article.

• Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials.

  Wang CN, Yang R, Hookey L. Wang CN, et al. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;3(3):111-119. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy070. Epub 2019 Feb 12. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32395685 Free PMC article.

• Efficacy of Short Message Service Text Messaging Interventions for Postoperative Pain Management: Systematic Review.

  Buck C, Keweloh C, Bouras A, Simoes EJ. Buck C, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 16;9(6):e20199. doi: 10.2196/20199. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34132646 Free PMC article. Review.

1. 1. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207–14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21481857 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
2. 1. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;97(7):1696–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x. - DOI - PubMed
3. 1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O'Brien MJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Levin TR, Bond JH, Brooks D, Byers T, Hyman N, Kirk L, Thorson A, Simmang C, Johnson D, Rex DK, US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. American Cancer Society Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006 May;130(6):1872–85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012. - DOI - PubMed
4. 1. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J, Burnand B, Vader J. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378–84. - PubMed
5. 1. Rosenfeld G, Krygier D, Enns RA, Singham J, Wiesinger H, Bressler B. The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;24(9):543–6. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21152458 - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3