A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27113237/ below:

Clinical validation of hrHPV testing on vaginal and urine self-samples in primary cervical screening (cross-sectional results from the Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway-PaVDaG study)

. 2016 Apr 25;6(4):e010660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010660. Clinical validation of hrHPV testing on vaginal and urine self-samples in primary cervical screening (cross-sectional results from the Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway-PaVDaG study)

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Clinical validation of hrHPV testing on vaginal and urine self-samples in primary cervical screening (cross-sectional results from the Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway-PaVDaG study)

Grazyna Stanczuk et al. BMJ Open. 2016.

. 2016 Apr 25;6(4):e010660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010660. Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Objectives: Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway (PaVDaG) assessed the performance of a high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) PCR-based assay to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in self-collected vaginal and urine samples.

Setting: Women attending routine cervical screening in primary care.

Participants: 5318 women aged 20-60 years provided self-collected random urine and vaginal samples for hrHPV testing and a clinician-collected liquid-based cytology (LBC) sample for cytology and hrHPV testing.

Interventions: HrHPV testing. All samples were tested for hrHPV using the PCR-based cobas 4800 assay. Colposcopy was offered to women with high-grade or repeated borderline/low-grade cytological abnormalities; also to those who were LBC negative but hrHPV 16/18 positive.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The self-tests' absolute sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ were assessed on all biospecimens; also, their relative sensitivity and specificity compared with clinician-taken samples. Interlaboratory and intralaboratory performance of the hrHPV assay in self-collected samples was also established.

Results: HrHPV prevalence was 14.7%, 16.6% and 11.6% in cervical, vaginal and urine samples, respectively. Sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ was 97.7% (95% to 100%), 94.6% (90.7% to 98.5%) and 63.1% (54.6% to 71.7%) for cervical, vaginal and urine hrHPV detection, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 87.3% (86.4% to 88.2%), 85.4% (84.4% to 86.3%) and 89.8% (89.0% to 90.7%). There was a 38% (24% to 57%) higher HPV detection rate in vaginal self-samples from women over 50 years compared with those ≤29 years. Relative sensitivity and specificity of hrHPV positivity for the detection of CIN2+ in vaginal versus cervical samples were 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) and 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99); urine versus cervical comparisons were 0.53 (0.42 to 0.67) and 1.03 (1.02 to 1.04). The intralaboratory and interlaboratory agreement for hrHPV positivity in self-samples was high (κ values 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) and 0.94 (0.92 to 0.97) for vaginal samples and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.98) and 0.90 (0.87 to 0.94) for urine samples).

Conclusions: The sensitivity of self-collected vaginal samples for the detection of CIN2+ was similar to that of cervical samples and justifies consideration of this sample for primary screening.

Keywords: PRIMARY CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SEXUAL MEDICINE; VIROLOGY.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Cytology and hrHPV results with…

Figure 1

Cytology and hrHPV results with corresponding colposcopies and histological outcomes. Cytology results reported…

Figure 1

Cytology and hrHPV results with corresponding colposcopies and histological outcomes. Cytology results reported as: negative (normal); unsatisfactory (inadequate); BL (ASCUS)/mild dyskaryosis=LG and moderate/severe dyskaryosis=HG. Histology results reported as CIN grade

Figure 2

(A, B). Age-specific relative increase…

Figure 2

(A, B). Age-specific relative increase of cobas 4800 HPV detection in vaginal versus…

Figure 2

(A, B). Age-specific relative increase of cobas 4800 HPV detection in vaginal versus cervical and urine versus cervical samples corrected for no samples/no HPV results for each type of sample. This is presented as a ratio of hrHPV+ vaginal/hrHPV+ cervical and hrHPV+ urine/hrHPV+ cervical samples with corresponding 95% CIs. hrHPV, high-risk human papillomavirus.

Figure 3

The distribution of ct values…

Figure 3

The distribution of ct values (cycling time=number of PCR cycles needed to detect…

Figure 3

The distribution of ct values (cycling time=number of PCR cycles needed to detect hrHPV DNA) observed in PCR hrHPV DNA amplification using cobas 4800 assay in three samples. hrHPV, high-risk human papillomavirus.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A et al. . Evidence regarding HPV testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30:F88–99. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM et al. . Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. International HPV screening working group. Lancet 2014;383:524–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meijer CJ, Berkhof J, Castle PE et al. . Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older. Int J Cancer 2009;124:516–20. 10.1002/ijc.24010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ et al. . Which high-risk HPV assays fulfil criteria for use in primary cervical cancer screening? Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;211:817–26. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verdoodt F, Jentschke M, Hillemanns P et al. . Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening program by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:2375–85. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3