A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26908517/ below:

Reducing income-related inequities in colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis of organised programme and non-programme screening delivery in Winnipeg, Manitoba

. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e009470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009470. Reducing income-related inequities in colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis of organised programme and non-programme screening delivery in Winnipeg, Manitoba

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Reducing income-related inequities in colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis of organised programme and non-programme screening delivery in Winnipeg, Manitoba

Kathleen M Decker et al. BMJ Open. 2016.

. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e009470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009470. Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Objective: We examined organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme and non-programme faecal occult blood test (FOBT) use from 2008 to 2012 for individuals living in Winnipeg, Manitoba, by area-level income.

Setting: Winnipeg, Manitoba, a region with universal healthcare and an organised CRC screening programme.

Participants: Individuals who had a non-programme FOBT were identified from the Provincial Medical Claims database. Individuals who had a programme FOBT were identified from the provincial screening registry. Census data were used to determine average household income based on area of residence.

Statistical analysis: Trends in age-standardised FOBT rates were examined using Joinpoint Regression. Logistic regression was performed to explore the association between programme and non-programme FOBT use and income quintile.

Results: FOBT use (non-programme and programme) increased from 32.2% in 2008 to 41.6% in 2012. Individuals living in the highest income areas (Q5) were more likely to have a non-programme FOBT compared with those living in other areas. Individuals living in areas with the lowest average income level (Q1) were less likely to have had programme FOBT than those living in areas with the highest average income level (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.82). There was no difference in programme FOBT use for individuals living in areas with the second lowest income level (Q2) compared with those living in areas with the highest. Individuals living in areas with a moderate-income level (Q3 and Q4) were more likely to have had a programme FOBT compared with those living in an area with the highest income level (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15 for Q3 and OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.13 for Q4).

Conclusions: Inequities by income observed for non-programme FOBTs were largely eliminated when programme FOBTs were examined. Targeted interventions within organised screening programmes in very low-income areas are needed.

Keywords: ONCOLOGY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Age standardised rates of non-programme…

Figure 1

Age standardised rates of non-programme and programme faecal occult blood test coverage for…

Figure 1

Age standardised rates of non-programme and programme faecal occult blood test coverage for individuals who lived in Winnipeg, 2008–2012 by income quintile.

Figure 2

Age standardised rates of non-programme…

Figure 2

Age standardised rates of non-programme faecal occult blood test coverage for individuals who…

Figure 2

Age standardised rates of non-programme faecal occult blood test coverage for individuals who lived in Winnipeg, 2008–2012 by income quintile.

Figure 3

Age standardised rates of programme…

Figure 3

Age standardised rates of programme faecal occult blood test coverage for individuals who…

Figure 3

Age standardised rates of programme faecal occult blood test coverage for individuals who lived in Winnipeg, 2008–2012 by income quintile.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Canadian Cancer Society's Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2014. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society, 2014.
    1. Wilson LS, Lightwood J. Model of estimated rates of colorectal cancer from polyp growth by year of surveillance. J Med Screen 2001;8:187–96. 10.1136/jms.8.4.187 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kewenter J, Brevinge H, Engaras B et al. . Results of screening, rescreening, and follow-up in a prospective randomized study for detection of colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood testing: results for 68,308 subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:468–72. 10.3109/00365529409096840 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al. . Randomised controlled trial of faecal occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Gut 2002;50:29–32. 10.1136/gut.50.1.29 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3