A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26826147/ below:

Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study

. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388. Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study Shanti Vijayaraghavan  2 Joe Wherton  3 Sara Shaw  1 Emma Byrne  3 Desirée Campbell-Richards  2 Satya Bhattacharya  2 Philippa Hanson  2 Seendy Ramoutar  2 Charles Gutteridge  2 Isabel Hodkinson  4 Anna Collard  2 Joanne Morris  2

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study

Trisha Greenhalgh et al. BMJ Open. 2016.

. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388. Authors Trisha Greenhalgh  1 Shanti Vijayaraghavan  2 Joe Wherton  3 Sara Shaw  1 Emma Byrne  3 Desirée Campbell-Richards  2 Satya Bhattacharya  2 Philippa Hanson  2 Seendy Ramoutar  2 Charles Gutteridge  2 Isabel Hodkinson  4 Anna Collard  2 Joanne Morris  2 Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Introduction: Remote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations.

Methods: To explore the advantages and limitations of video consultations, we will conduct in-depth qualitative studies of real consultations (microlevel) embedded in an organisational case study (mesolevel), taking account of national context (macrolevel). The study is based in 2 contrasting clinical settings (diabetes and cancer) in a National Health Service (NHS) acute trust in London, UK. Main data sources are: microlevel--audio, video and screen capture to produce rich multimodal data on 45 remote consultations; mesolevel--interviews, ethnographic observations and analysis of documents within the trust; macrolevel--key informant interviews of national-level stakeholders and document analysis. Data will be analysed and synthesised using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory.

Ethics approval: City Road and Hampstead NHS Research Ethics Committee, 9 December 2014, reference 14/LO/1883.

Planned outputs: We plan outputs for 5 main audiences: (1) academics: research publications and conference presentations; (2) service providers: standard operating procedures, provisional operational guidance and key safety issues; (3) professional bodies and defence societies: summary of relevant findings to inform guidance to members; (4) policymakers: summary of key findings; (5) patients and carers: 'what to expect in your virtual consultation'.

Discussion: The research literature on video consultations is sparse. Such consultations offer potential advantages to patients (who are spared the cost and inconvenience of travel) and the healthcare system (eg, they may be more cost-effective), but fears have been expressed that they may be clinically risky and/or less acceptable to patients or staff, and they bring significant technical, logistical and regulatory challenges. We anticipate that this study will contribute to a balanced assessment of when, how and in what circumstances this model might be introduced.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Stones’ strong structuration theory, adapted…

Figure 1

Stones’ strong structuration theory, adapted to encompass a technology dimension (reproduced from Greenhalgh…

Figure 1

Stones’ strong structuration theory, adapted to encompass a technology dimension (reproduced from Greenhalgh and Stones24).

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. National Information Board (UK). Personalised health and care 2020: using data and technology to transform outcomes for patients and citizens. London: Stationery Office, 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... (accessed 8.6.2015).
    1. Armfield NR, Gray LC, Smith AC. Clinical use of Skype: a review of the evidence base. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18:125–7. 10.1258/jtt.2012.SFT101 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gentles SJ, Lokker C, McKibbon KA. Health information technology to facilitate communication involving health care providers, caregivers, and pediatric patients: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e22 10.2196/jmir.1390 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armfield NR, Bradford M, Bradford NK. The clinical use of Skype—for which patients, with which problems and in which settings? A snapshot review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015;84:737–42. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Couns Psychol 1989;36:223 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223 - DOI

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3