Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) studyTrisha Greenhalgh et al. BMJ Open. 2016.
. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388. Authors Trisha Greenhalgh 1 , Shanti Vijayaraghavan 2 , Joe Wherton 3 , Sara Shaw 1 , Emma Byrne 3 , Desirée Campbell-Richards 2 , Satya Bhattacharya 2 , Philippa Hanson 2 , Seendy Ramoutar 2 , Charles Gutteridge 2 , Isabel Hodkinson 4 , Anna Collard 2 , Joanne Morris 2 AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractIntroduction: Remote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations.
Methods: To explore the advantages and limitations of video consultations, we will conduct in-depth qualitative studies of real consultations (microlevel) embedded in an organisational case study (mesolevel), taking account of national context (macrolevel). The study is based in 2 contrasting clinical settings (diabetes and cancer) in a National Health Service (NHS) acute trust in London, UK. Main data sources are: microlevel--audio, video and screen capture to produce rich multimodal data on 45 remote consultations; mesolevel--interviews, ethnographic observations and analysis of documents within the trust; macrolevel--key informant interviews of national-level stakeholders and document analysis. Data will be analysed and synthesised using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory.
Ethics approval: City Road and Hampstead NHS Research Ethics Committee, 9 December 2014, reference 14/LO/1883.
Planned outputs: We plan outputs for 5 main audiences: (1) academics: research publications and conference presentations; (2) service providers: standard operating procedures, provisional operational guidance and key safety issues; (3) professional bodies and defence societies: summary of relevant findings to inform guidance to members; (4) policymakers: summary of key findings; (5) patients and carers: 'what to expect in your virtual consultation'.
Discussion: The research literature on video consultations is sparse. Such consultations offer potential advantages to patients (who are spared the cost and inconvenience of travel) and the healthcare system (eg, they may be more cost-effective), but fears have been expressed that they may be clinically risky and/or less acceptable to patients or staff, and they bring significant technical, logistical and regulatory challenges. We anticipate that this study will contribute to a balanced assessment of when, how and in what circumstances this model might be introduced.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
FiguresFigure 1
Stones’ strong structuration theory, adapted…
Figure 1
Stones’ strong structuration theory, adapted to encompass a technology dimension (reproduced from Greenhalgh…
Figure 1Stones’ strong structuration theory, adapted to encompass a technology dimension (reproduced from Greenhalgh and Stones24).
Similar articlesGreenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Vijayaraghavan S, Morris J, Bhattacharya S, Hanson P, Campbell-Richards D, Ramoutar S, Collard A, Hodkinson I. Greenhalgh T, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 17;20(4):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9897. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29625956 Free PMC article.
Shaw SE, Seuren LM, Wherton J, Cameron D, A'Court C, Vijayaraghavan S, Morris J, Bhattacharya S, Greenhalgh T. Shaw SE, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 11;22(5):e18378. doi: 10.2196/18378. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32391799 Free PMC article.
Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE, Alvarez Nishio A, Booth A, Byng R, Clarke A, Dakin F, Davies R, Faulkner S, Hemmings N, Husain L, Kalin A, Ladds E, Moore L, Rosen R, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Wherton J, Wieringa S. Greenhalgh T, et al. NIHR Open Res. 2022 Aug 8;2:46. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13289.1. eCollection 2022. NIHR Open Res. 2022. PMID: 37881300 Free PMC article.
Wallace P, Barber J, Clayton W, Currell R, Fleming K, Garner P, Haines A, Harrison R, Jacklin P, Jarrett C, Jayasuriya R, Lewis L, Parker S, Roberts J, Thompson S, Wainwright P. Wallace P, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(50):1-106, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta8500. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15546515 Review.
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Scott W, Park C, Christopoulos G, Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, et al. Schmerz. 2023 Oct;37(5):360-371. doi: 10.1007/s00482-022-00659-5. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Schmerz. 2023. PMID: 35834004 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Rostron H, Wright JM, Gilbert AW, Dillon B, Pini S, Redmond AC, Livermore P. Rostron H, et al. BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 21;14(2):e082515. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082515. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38387983 Free PMC article.
Morrison C, Beattie M, Wherton J, Stark C, Anderson J, Hunter-Rowe C, Gray NM. Morrison C, et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Mar;10(1):e001259. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001259. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 33674346 Free PMC article.
Williamson S, Patterson J, Crosby R, Johnson R, Sandhu H, Johnson S, Jenkins J, Casey M, Kearins O, Taylor-Phillips S. Williamson S, et al. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 29;13:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.016. eCollection 2019 Mar. Prev Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 30666286 Free PMC article. Review.
Patil VM, Pande N, Chandrasekharan A, M C, Tonse R, Krishnatry R, Goda JS, Dsouza H, Vallathol DH, Chakraborty S, Gupta T, Jalali R. Patil VM, et al. CNS Oncol. 2018 Apr;7(2):CNS14. doi: 10.2217/cns-2017-0024. Epub 2018 Apr 30. CNS Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29708400 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3