A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26809487/ below:

Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening: A Multilevel Analysis of the Health of Houston Survey

. 2016 Mar-Apr;26(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.11.002. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening: A Multilevel Analysis of the Health of Houston Survey

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening: A Multilevel Analysis of the Health of Houston Survey

William A Calo et al. Womens Health Issues. 2016 Mar-Apr.

. 2016 Mar-Apr;26(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.11.002. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: An emerging literature reports that women who reside in socioeconomically deprived communities are less likely to adhere to mammography screening. This study explored associations between area-level socioeconomic measures and mammography screening among a racially and ethnically diverse sample of women in Texas.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, multilevel study linking individual-level data from the 2010 Health of Houston Survey and contextual data from the U.S. Census. Women ages 40 to 74 years (n = 1,541) were included in the analyses. We examined tract-level poverty, unemployment, education, Hispanic and Black composition, female-headed householder families, and crowding as contextual measures. Using multilevel logistic regression modeling, we compared most disadvantaged tracts (quartiles 2-4) to the most advantaged tract (quartile 1).

Results: Overall, 64% of the sample was adherent to mammography screening. Screening rates were lower (p < .05) among Hispanics, those foreign born, women aged 40 to 49 years, and those with low educational attainment, unemployed, and without health insurance coverage. Women living in areas with high levels of poverty (quartile 2 vs. 1: odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.85), Hispanic composition (quartile 3 vs. 1: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90), and crowding (quartile 4 vs. 1: OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.96) were less likely to have up-to-date mammography screening, net of individual-level factors.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of examining area-level socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening. The study represents an advance on previous research because we examined multiple area measures, controlled for key individual-level covariates, used data aggregated at the tract level, and accounted for the nested structure of the data.

Copyright © 2016 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Akinyemiju TF, Soliman AS, Johnson NJ, Altekruse SF, Welch K, Banerjee M, et al. Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status and healthcare resources in relation to black-white breast cancer survival disparities. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;2013:490472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2014.
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2013. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2013.
    1. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10. - PubMed
    1. Baker LC, Phillips KA, Haas JS, Liang SY, Sonneborn D. The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(6 Pt 1):1751–1772. - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3