Observational Study
. 2017 Apr;66(4):644-653. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310249. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions Nicholas G Burgess 1 2 , Nicholas Tutticci 1 , Luke F Hourigan 3 4 , Simon A Zanati 5 6 , Gregor J Brown 5 7 , Rajvinder Singh 8 , Stephen J Williams 1 , Spiro C Raftopoulos 9 , Donald Ormonde 9 , Alan Moss 6 , Karen Byth 10 11 , Heok P'Ng 12 , Hema Mahajan 12 , Duncan McLeod 12 , Michael J Bourke 1 2Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Observational Study
Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesionsMaria Pellise et al. Gut. 2017 Apr.
. 2017 Apr;66(4):644-653. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310249. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Authors Maria Pellise 1 , Nicholas G Burgess 1 2 , Nicholas Tutticci 1 , Luke F Hourigan 3 4 , Simon A Zanati 5 6 , Gregor J Brown 5 7 , Rajvinder Singh 8 , Stephen J Williams 1 , Spiro C Raftopoulos 9 , Donald Ormonde 9 , Alan Moss 6 , Karen Byth 10 11 , Heok P'Ng 12 , Hema Mahajan 12 , Duncan McLeod 12 , Michael J Bourke 1 2 AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractObjective: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is effective for large laterally spreading flat and sessile lesions (LSLs). Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are linked to the relative failure of colonoscopy to prevent proximal colorectal cancer. We aimed to examine the technical success, adverse events and recurrence following EMR for large SSA/Ps in comparison with large conventional adenomas.
Design: Over 74 months till August 2014, prospective multicentre data of LSLs ≥20 mm were analysed. A standardised dye-based conventional EMR technique followed by scheduled surveillance colonoscopy was used.
Results: From a total of 2000 lesions, 323 SSA/Ps in 246 patients and 1527 adenomas in 1425 patients were included for analysis. Technical success for EMR was superior in SSA/Ps compared with adenomas (99.1% vs 94.5%, p<0.001). Significant bleeding and perforation were similar in both cohorts. The cumulative recurrence rates for adenomas after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 16.1%, 20.4%, 23.4% and 28.4%, respectively. For SSA/Ps, they were 6.3% at 6 months and 7.0% from 12 months onwards (p<0.001). Following multivariable adjustment, the HR of recurrence for adenomas versus SSA/Ps was 1.7 (95% CI 0.9 to 3.0, p=0.097). Subgroup analysis by lesion size revealed an eightfold increased risk of recurrence for 20-25 mm adenomas versus SSA/Ps, but no significantly different risk between lesion types in larger lesion groups.
Conclusion: Recurrence after EMR of 20-25 mm LSLs is significantly less frequent in SSA/Ps compared with adenomatous lesions. SSA/Ps can be more effectively removed than adenomatous LSLs with equivalent safety. Ensuring complete initial resection is imperative for avoiding recurrence.
Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01368289.
Keywords: COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMAS; COLORECTAL CANCER; ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Similar articlesBurgess NG, Pellise M, Nanda KS, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, P'Ng H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Burgess NG, et al. Gut. 2016 Mar;65(3):437-46. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308603. Epub 2015 Mar 2. Gut. 2016. PMID: 25731869
Bronsgeest K, Huisman JF, Langers A, Boonstra JJ, Schenk BE, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Vasen HFA, Hardwick JCH. Bronsgeest K, et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1711-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2892-7. Epub 2017 Sep 8. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017. PMID: 28884225 Free PMC article.
Rex KD, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Rex KD, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):538-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Apr 4. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25851161
Murakami T, Sakamoto N, Nagahara A. Murakami T, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;34(10):1685-1695. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14752. Epub 2019 Jun 30. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31158302 Review.
Ma MX, Bourke MJ. Ma MX, et al. Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):747-760. doi: 10.5009/gnl16523. Gut Liver. 2017. PMID: 28494577 Free PMC article. Review.
Kim SY, Kwak MS, Yoon SM, Jung Y, Kim JW, Boo SJ, Oh EH, Jeon SR, Nam SJ, Park SY, Park SK, Chun J, Baek DH, Choi MY, Park S, Byeon JS, Kim HK, Cho JY, Lee MS, Lee OY; Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Korean Society of Gastroenterology; Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. Kim SY, et al. Clin Endosc. 2022 Nov;55(6):703-725. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.136. Epub 2022 Oct 13. Clin Endosc. 2022. PMID: 36225130 Free PMC article. Review.
Thiruvengadam SS, Fung BM, Barakat MT, Tabibian JH. Thiruvengadam SS, et al. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2022 Mar;18(3):133-144. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2022. PMID: 35506001 Free PMC article.
Castillo-Regalado E, Uchima H. Castillo-Regalado E, et al. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar 16;14(3):113-128. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.113. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35432746 Free PMC article. Review.
Tavakkoli A, Law RJ, Bedi AO, Prabhu A, Hiatt T, Anderson MA, Wamsteker EJ, Elmunzer BJ, Piraka CR, Scheiman JM, Elta GH, Kwon RS. Tavakkoli A, et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Sep;62(9):2464-2471. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4643-6. Epub 2017 Jun 9. Dig Dis Sci. 2017. PMID: 28600656 Free PMC article.
Gomez Cifuentes JD, Berger S, Caskey K, Jove A, Sealock R, Hair C, Velez M, Jarbrink-Sehgal M, Thrift AP, da Costa WL Jr, Gyanprakash K. Gomez Cifuentes JD, et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Oct;68(10):3935-3942. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08054-5. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Dig Dis Sci. 2023. PMID: 37548897
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3