Review
. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force RecommendationItem in Clipboard
Review
Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force RecommendationHeidi D Nelson et al. Ann Intern Med. 2016.
Free article . 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Epub 2016 Jan 12.Item in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended biennial mammography screening for women aged 50 to 74 years and selective screening for those aged 40 to 49 years.
Purpose: To review studies of the effectiveness of breast cancer screening in average-risk women.
Data sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases to 4 June 2015.
Study selection: English-language randomized, controlled trials and observational studies of screening with mammography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography that reported breast cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, or advanced breast cancer outcomes.
Data extraction: Investigators extracted and confirmed data and dual rated study quality; discrepancies were resolved through consensus.
Data synthesis: Fair-quality evidence from a meta-analysis of mammography trials indicated relative risks (RRs) for breast cancer mortality of 0.92 for women aged 39 to 49 years (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02) (9 trials; 3 deaths prevented per 10,000 women over 10 years); 0.86 for those aged 50 to 59 years (CI, 0.68 to 0.97) (7 trials; 8 deaths prevented per 10,000 women over 10 years); 0.67 for those aged 60 to 69 years (CI, 0.54 to 0.83) (5 trials; 21 deaths prevented per 10,000 women over 10 years); and 0.80 for those aged 70 to 74 years (CI, 0.51 to 1.28) (3 trials; 13 deaths prevented per 10,000 women over 10 years). Risk reduction was 25% to 31% for women aged 50 to 69 years in observational studies of mammography screening. All-cause mortality was not reduced with screening. Advanced breast cancer was reduced for women aged 50 years or older (RR, 0.62 [CI, 0.46 to 0.83]) (3 trials) but not those aged 39 to 49 years (RR, 0.98 [CI, 0.74 to 1.37]) (4 trials); less evidence supported this outcome.
Limitations: Most trials used imaging technologies and treatments that are now outdated, and definitions of advanced breast cancer were heterogeneous. Studies of effectiveness based on risk factors, intervals, or other modalities were unavailable or methodologically limited.
Conclusion: Breast cancer mortality is generally reduced with mammography screening, although estimates are not statistically significant at all ages and the magnitudes of effect are small. Advanced cancer is reduced with screening for women aged 50 years or older.
Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Similar articlesNelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Griffin J, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Nelson HD, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67. doi: 10.7326/M15-0970. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26756737 Review.
Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Siu AL, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26757170
Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Nelson HD, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19920273 Free PMC article. Review.
Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, Davidson B, Mongtomery RC, Crowley MJ, McCrory DC, Kendrick A, Sanders GD. Myers ER, et al. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26501537 Review.
Ringash J; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Ringash J, et al. CMAJ. 2001 Feb 20;164(4):469-76. CMAJ. 2001. PMID: 11233866 Free PMC article. Review.
Houssami N, Hofvind S, Soerensen AL, Robledo KP, Hunter K, Bernardi D, Lång K, Johnson K, Aglen CF, Zackrisson S. Houssami N, et al. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 20;34:100804. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100804. eCollection 2021 Apr. EClinicalMedicine. 2021. PMID: 33997729 Free PMC article.
Houghton SC, Hankinson SE. Houghton SC, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 May;30(5):822-844. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1193. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021. PMID: 33947744 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Bringedal B, Fretheim A, Nilsen S, Isaksson Rø K. Bringedal B, et al. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e029739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029739. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31473617 Free PMC article.
Mall S, Brennan PC, Mello-Thoms C. Mall S, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2019 Oct;32(5):746-760. doi: 10.1007/s10278-018-00174-z. J Digit Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31410677 Free PMC article.
Cescon DW, Bratman SV, Chan SM, Siu LL. Cescon DW, et al. Nat Cancer. 2020 Mar;1(3):276-290. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-0043-5. Epub 2020 Mar 20. Nat Cancer. 2020. PMID: 35122035 Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3