Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Crafting Appealing Text Messages to Encourage Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Completion: A Qualitative StudyKathryn E Weaver et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4651. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: mHealth interventions that incorporate text messages have great potential to increase receipt of preventive health services such as colorectal cancer screening. However, little is known about older adult perspectives regarding the receipt of text messages from their health care providers.
Objective: To assess whether older adults would value and access text messages from their physician's practice regarding colorectal cancer screening.
Methods: We conducted four focus groups with 26 adults, aged 50 to 75 years, who had either recently completed or were overdue for colorectal cancer screening. A trained moderator followed a semistructured interview guide covering participant knowledge and attitudes regarding colorectal cancer screening, potential barriers to colorectal cancer screening, attitudes about receiving electronic communications from a doctor's office, and reactions to sample text messages.
Results: Participant responses to three primary research questions were examined: (1) facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening, (2) attitudes toward receiving text messages from providers, and (3) characteristics of appealing text messages. Two themes related to facilitators of colorectal cancer screening were perceived benefits/need and family experiences and encouragement. Themes related to barriers included unpleasantness, discomfort, knowledge gaps, fear of complications, and system factors. Four themes emerged regarding receipt of text messages from health care providers: (1) comfort and familiarity with technology, (2) privacy concerns/potential for errors, (3) impact on patient-provider relationship, and (4) perceived helpfulness. Many participants expressed initial reluctance to receiving text messages but responded favorably when shown sample messages. Participants preferred messages that contained content that was important to them and were positive and reassuring, personalized, and friendly to novice texters (eg, avoided the use of texting shorthand phrases and complicated replies); they did not want messages that contain bad news or test results. They wanted the ability to choose alternative options such as email or phone calls.
Conclusions: Older adults are receptive to receiving cancer screening text messages from health care providers. Sharing sample messages with patients may increase acceptance of this tool in the clinic setting. Supportive tailored text messaging reminders could enhance uptake of colorectal cancer screening by enhancing patient self-efficacy and providing cues to action to complete colonoscopy or fecal occult blood testing.
Keywords: colorectal cancer; mhealth; older adults; qualitative; screening; text messages.
Conflict of interest statementConflicts of Interest: None declared.
FiguresFigure 1
Examples of text messages that…
Figure 1
Examples of text messages that participants viewed regarding colon cancer screening.
Figure 1Examples of text messages that participants viewed regarding colon cancer screening.
Similar articlesLenoir KM, Sandberg JC, Miller DP, Wells BJ. Lenoir KM, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 17;7:e41011. doi: 10.2196/41011. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 36649056 Free PMC article.
Green BB, BlueSpruce J, Tuzzio L, Vernon SW, Aubree Shay L, Catz SL. Green BB, et al. BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4458-6. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28558663 Free PMC article.
Thompson JH, Davis MM, Michaels L, Rivelli JS, Castillo ML, Younger BM, Castro M, Reich SL, Coronado GD. Thompson JH, et al. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):307-317. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180026. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019. PMID: 31068395 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Decruz GM, Ng CH, Lim KT, Devi MK, Lim F, Tai CH, Chong CS. Decruz GM, et al. J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):63-69. doi: 10.1177/0969141320923381. Epub 2020 May 21. J Med Screen. 2021. PMID: 32438893 Review.
Gimeno Garcia AZ, Hernandez Alvarez Buylla N, Nicolas-Perez D, Quintero E. Gimeno Garcia AZ, et al. ISRN Oncol. 2014 Mar 5;2014:425787. doi: 10.1155/2014/425787. eCollection 2014. ISRN Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24729896 Free PMC article. Review.
Hagoel L, Neter E, Stein N, Rennert G. Hagoel L, et al. Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1998-2004. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303364. Epub 2016 Sep 15. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27631750 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Sanchez Antelo V, Kohler RE, Curotto M, Viswanath KV, Paolino M, Arrossi S. Sanchez Antelo V, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Mar 6;4(3):e14652. doi: 10.2196/14652. JMIR Form Res. 2020. PMID: 32032940 Free PMC article.
Wood A, Emery JD, Jenkins M, Chondros P, Campbell T, Wenkart E, O'Reilly C, Cowie T, Dixon I, Toner J, Khalajzadeh H, Gutierrez JM, Govan L, Buckle G, McIntosh JG. Wood A, et al. Trials. 2022 Jan 12;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05877-3. Trials. 2022. PMID: 35022080 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Kruse G, Park ER, Shahid NN, Abroms L, Haberer JE, Rigotti NA. Kruse G, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 26;7(3):e11498. doi: 10.2196/11498. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30912755 Free PMC article.
O'Leary DP, Zaheer A, Redmond HP, Corrigan MA. O'Leary DP, et al. Mhealth. 2016 Oct 20;2:38. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2016.09.02. eCollection 2016. Mhealth. 2016. PMID: 28293611 Free PMC article. Review.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3