A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26412456/ below:

Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial

. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Luis Paz-AresLeora HornDavid R SpigelMartin SteinsNeal E ReadyLaura Q ChowEverett E VokesEnriqueta FelipEsther HolgadoFabrice BarlesiMartin KohlhäuflOscar ArrietaMarco Angelo BurgioJérôme FayetteHervé LenaElena PoddubskayaDavid E GerberScott N GettingerCharles M RudinNaiyer RizviLucio CrinòGeorge R Blumenschein JrScott J AntoniaCécile DorangeChristopher T HarbisonFriedrich Graf FinckensteinJulie R Brahmer

Affiliations

Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Clinical Trial

Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Hossein Borghaei et al. N Engl J Med. 2015.

. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27. Authors Hossein Borghaei  1 Luis Paz-AresLeora HornDavid R SpigelMartin SteinsNeal E ReadyLaura Q ChowEverett E VokesEnriqueta FelipEsther HolgadoFabrice BarlesiMartin KohlhäuflOscar ArrietaMarco Angelo BurgioJérôme FayetteHervé LenaElena PoddubskayaDavid E GerberScott N GettingerCharles M RudinNaiyer RizviLucio CrinòGeorge R Blumenschein JrScott J AntoniaCécile DorangeChristopher T HarbisonFriedrich Graf FinckensteinJulie R Brahmer Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, disrupts PD-1-mediated signaling and may restore antitumor immunity.

Methods: In this randomized, open-label, international phase 3 study, we assigned patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had progressed during or after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy to receive nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks or docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: Overall survival was longer with nivolumab than with docetaxel. The median overall survival was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7 to 15.0) among 292 patients in the nivolumab group and 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.7) among 290 patients in the docetaxel group (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 96% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P=0.002). At 1 year, the overall survival rate was 51% (95% CI, 45 to 56) with nivolumab versus 39% (95% CI, 33 to 45) with docetaxel. With additional follow-up, the overall survival rate at 18 months was 39% (95% CI, 34 to 45) with nivolumab versus 23% (95% CI, 19 to 28) with docetaxel. The response rate was 19% with nivolumab versus 12% with docetaxel (P=0.02). Although progression-free survival did not favor nivolumab over docetaxel (median, 2.3 months and 4.2 months, respectively), the rate of progression-free survival at 1 year was higher with nivolumab than with docetaxel (19% and 8%, respectively). Nivolumab was associated with even greater efficacy than docetaxel across all end points in subgroups defined according to prespecified levels of tumor-membrane expression (≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥10%) of the PD-1 ligand. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 10% of the patients in the nivolumab group, as compared with 54% of those in the docetaxel group.

Conclusions: Among patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC that had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy, overall survival was longer with nivolumab than with docetaxel. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 057 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01673867.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are…

Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Data are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.

Comment in Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin oncol. 2000;18:2354–62. - PubMed
    1. Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2095–103. - PubMed
    1. Taxotere (docetaxel) US Prescribing Information. 2010 May; Accessed March 23, 2015, at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/020449s059lbl.pdf.
    1. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1589–97. - PubMed
    1. Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, et al. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:981–88. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3