Clinical Trial
. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Luis Paz-Ares, Leora Horn, David R Spigel, Martin Steins, Neal E Ready, Laura Q Chow, Everett E Vokes, Enriqueta Felip, Esther Holgado, Fabrice Barlesi, Martin Kohlhäufl, Oscar Arrieta, Marco Angelo Burgio, Jérôme Fayette, Hervé Lena, Elena Poddubskaya, David E Gerber, Scott N Gettinger, Charles M Rudin, Naiyer Rizvi, Lucio Crinò, George R Blumenschein Jr, Scott J Antonia, Cécile Dorange, Christopher T Harbison, Friedrich Graf Finckenstein, Julie R BrahmerAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Clinical Trial
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung CancerHossein Borghaei et al. N Engl J Med. 2015.
. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27. Authors Hossein Borghaei 1 , Luis Paz-Ares, Leora Horn, David R Spigel, Martin Steins, Neal E Ready, Laura Q Chow, Everett E Vokes, Enriqueta Felip, Esther Holgado, Fabrice Barlesi, Martin Kohlhäufl, Oscar Arrieta, Marco Angelo Burgio, Jérôme Fayette, Hervé Lena, Elena Poddubskaya, David E Gerber, Scott N Gettinger, Charles M Rudin, Naiyer Rizvi, Lucio Crinò, George R Blumenschein Jr, Scott J Antonia, Cécile Dorange, Christopher T Harbison, Friedrich Graf Finckenstein, Julie R Brahmer AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, disrupts PD-1-mediated signaling and may restore antitumor immunity.
Methods: In this randomized, open-label, international phase 3 study, we assigned patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had progressed during or after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy to receive nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks or docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.
Results: Overall survival was longer with nivolumab than with docetaxel. The median overall survival was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7 to 15.0) among 292 patients in the nivolumab group and 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.7) among 290 patients in the docetaxel group (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 96% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P=0.002). At 1 year, the overall survival rate was 51% (95% CI, 45 to 56) with nivolumab versus 39% (95% CI, 33 to 45) with docetaxel. With additional follow-up, the overall survival rate at 18 months was 39% (95% CI, 34 to 45) with nivolumab versus 23% (95% CI, 19 to 28) with docetaxel. The response rate was 19% with nivolumab versus 12% with docetaxel (P=0.02). Although progression-free survival did not favor nivolumab over docetaxel (median, 2.3 months and 4.2 months, respectively), the rate of progression-free survival at 1 year was higher with nivolumab than with docetaxel (19% and 8%, respectively). Nivolumab was associated with even greater efficacy than docetaxel across all end points in subgroups defined according to prespecified levels of tumor-membrane expression (≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥10%) of the PD-1 ligand. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 10% of the patients in the nivolumab group, as compared with 54% of those in the docetaxel group.
Conclusions: Among patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC that had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy, overall survival was longer with nivolumab than with docetaxel. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 057 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01673867.).
FiguresFig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC
Data are…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLCData are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC
Data are…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLCData are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC
Data are…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLCData are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC
Data are…
Fig. 1. Efficacy of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLCData are based on a March 18, 2015 database lock. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. (B) Treatment effect on overall survival in pre-defined subsets. All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). HR was not computed for other subsets with less than 10 patients per treatment group. (C) Characteristics of response and progression as assessed per investigator. Ongoing response at last tumor assessment before censoring. Bar indicates progression-free survival. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression, death or last evaluable tumor assessment (censoring date). All randomized patients (nivolumab, n = 292; docetaxel, n = 290). Symbols represent censored observations. CI = confidence interval; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.
Comment inRomero D. Romero D. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;12(12):685. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.184. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26483299 No abstract available.
Borghaei H, Brahmer J. Borghaei H, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):493-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514790. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840144 No abstract available.
Hasegawa T, Uno H, Wei LJ. Hasegawa T, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):492-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514790. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840145 No abstract available.
Gyawali B, Ota A, Ando Y. Gyawali B, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):493. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1514790. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26840146 No abstract available.
Weintraub K. Weintraub K. Nature. 2017 Dec 21;552(7685):S62-S63. doi: 10.1038/d41586-017-08700-9. Nature. 2017. PMID: 29293220 No abstract available.
Huang M, Chen C, Sun LZ. Huang M, et al. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300132. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00132. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023. PMID: 37906725
Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Waterhouse D, Ready N, Gainor J, Arén Frontera O, Havel L, Steins M, Garassino MC, Aerts JG, Domine M, Paz-Ares L, Reck M, Baudelet C, Harbison CT, Lestini B, Spigel DR. Brahmer J, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627. Epub 2015 May 31. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 26028407 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Horn L, Spigel DR, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Ready N, Steins M, Poddubskaya E, Borghaei H, Felip E, Paz-Ares L, Pluzanski A, Reckamp KL, Burgio MA, Kohlhäeufl M, Waterhouse D, Barlesi F, Antonia S, Arrieta O, Fayette J, Crinò L, Rizvi N, Reck M, Hellmann MD, Geese WJ, Li A, Blackwood-Chirchir A, Healey D, Brahmer J, Eberhardt WEE. Horn L, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3924-3933. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062. Epub 2017 Oct 12. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29023213 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Kazandjian D, Suzman DL, Blumenthal G, Mushti S, He K, Libeg M, Keegan P, Pazdur R. Kazandjian D, et al. Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):634-42. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0507. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Oncologist. 2016. PMID: 26984449 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Wang C, Yu X, Wang W. Wang C, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5539. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005539. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 28033249 Free PMC article. Review.
Melosky B, Chu Q, Juergens R, Leighl N, McLeod D, Hirsh V. Melosky B, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1676-88. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.8049. Epub 2016 Feb 16. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26884577 Review.
Cole M, Anastasiou P, Lee C, Yu X, de Castro A, Roelink J, Moore C, Mugarza E, Jones M, Valand K, Rana S, Colliver E, Angelova M, Enfield KSS, Magness A, Mullokandov A, Kelly G, de Gruijl TD, Molina-Arcas M, Swanton C, Downward J, van Maldegem F. Cole M, et al. Sci Adv. 2024 Nov;10(44):eadl6464. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl6464. Epub 2024 Nov 1. Sci Adv. 2024. PMID: 39485838 Free PMC article.
Gussow AB, Koonin EV, Auslander N. Gussow AB, et al. NAR Cancer. 2021 May 17;3(2):zcab017. doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcab017. eCollection 2021 Jun. NAR Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34027407 Free PMC article.
Chen B, Yang M, Li K, Li J, Xu L, Xu F, Xu Y, Ren D, Zhang J, Liu L. Chen B, et al. Oncol Lett. 2021 Jul;22(1):540. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12801. Epub 2021 May 19. Oncol Lett. 2021. PMID: 34084219 Free PMC article.
Mizuno T, Katsuya Y, Sato J, Koyama T, Shimizu T, Yamamoto N. Mizuno T, et al. Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 26;12:925938. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925938. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36091105 Free PMC article. Review.
Pasello G, Pavan A, De Nuzzo M, Frega S, Ferro A, Dal Maso A, Bonanno L, Guarneri V, Girardi F. Pasello G, et al. Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 9;14:1415470. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1415470. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39045561 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3