Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Acceptability of delivering and accessing health information through text messaging among community health advisorsYu-Mei Schoenberger et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2641. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Communication technologies can play a significant role in decreasing communication inequalities and cancer disparities by promoting cancer control and enhancing population and individual health. Studies have shown that technology, such as the mobile phone short message service (SMS) or text messaging, can be an effective health communication strategy that influences individuals' health-related decisions, behaviors, and outcomes.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore usage of communication technologies, assess the acceptability of mobile technology for delivery and access of health information, and identify cancer and health information needs among Deep South Network for Cancer Control trained Community Health Advisors as Research Partners (CHARPs).
Methods: A mixed-method design was used, and a triangulation protocol was followed to combine quantitative and qualitative data. Focus groups (4 focus groups; n=37) and self-administered surveys (n=77) were conducted to determine CHARPs mobile phone and text message usage. The objective was to include identification of barriers and facilitators to a mobile phone intervention.
Results: All participants were African American (37/37, 100%), 11/37 (89%) were women, and the mean age was 53.4 (SD 13.9; focus groups) and 59.9 (SD 8.7; survey). Nearly all (33/37, 89%) of focus group participants reported owning a mobile phone. Of those, 8/33 (24%) owned a smartphone, 22/33 (67%) had a text messaging plan, and 18/33 (55%) and 11/33 (33%) received and sent text messages several times a week or day, respectively. Similar responses were seen among the survey participants, with 75/77 (97%) reporting owning a mobile phone, and of those, 22/75 (30%) owned a smartphone, 39/75 (53%) had a text messaging plan, and 37/75 (50%) received and 27/75 (37%) sent text messages several times a week or day. The benefits of a text messaging system mentioned by focus group participants included alternative form of communication, quick method for disseminating information, and privacy of communication. The main barriers reported by both groups to using mobile technology to receive health information were cost and not knowing how to text message. Ways to overcome barriers were explored with focus group participants, and education was the most proposed solution. Majority of CHARPs were in favor of receiving a weekly text message that would provide cancer/health information.
Conclusions: The findings from this study indicate that CHARPs are receptive to receiving text messages focusing on cancer/health information and would be likely to engage in mobile health research. These findings represent the first step in the development of an interactive mobile health program designed to provide cancer/health information and a support network for the Deep South Network Community Health Advisors as Research Partners (DSN CHARPs).
Keywords: cancer; community health workers; mobile health; text messaging.
Conflict of interest statementConflicts of Interest: Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
FiguresFigure 1
Smartphone ownership and SMS usage…
Figure 1
Smartphone ownership and SMS usage among participants owning a mobile phone.
Figure 1Smartphone ownership and SMS usage among participants owning a mobile phone.
Similar articlesSchoenberger YM, Phillips JM, Mohiuddin MO. Schoenberger YM, et al. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):636-41. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0743-6. J Cancer Educ. 2015. PMID: 25355523
Le D, Aldoory L, Garza MA, Fryer CS, Sawyer R, Holt CL. Le D, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2018 Mar 29;2(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/formative.8112. JMIR Form Res. 2018. PMID: 30684433 Free PMC article.
Sturgiss E, Advocat J, Barton C, Walker EN, Nielsen S, Wright A, Lam T, Gunatillaka N, Oad S, Wood C. Sturgiss E, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Sep 5;12:e55354. doi: 10.2196/55354. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 39235843 Free PMC article.
Berrouiguet S, Baca-García E, Brandt S, Walter M, Courtet P. Berrouiguet S, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 10;18(6):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5066. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27287668 Free PMC article. Review.
Schoenberger YM, Phillips JM, Mohiuddin MO. Schoenberger YM, et al. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):636-41. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0743-6. J Cancer Educ. 2015. PMID: 25355523
Taggart T, Grewe ME, Conserve DF, Gliwa C, Roman Isler M. Taggart T, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 2;17(11):e248. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4387. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 26525289 Free PMC article. Review.
Jackson I, Osaghae I, Ananaba N, Etuk A, Jackson N, Chido-Amajuoyi OG. Jackson I, et al. AIMS Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;7(2):363-379. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020031. eCollection 2020. AIMS Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32617363 Free PMC article.
Le D, Aldoory L, Garza MA, Fryer CS, Sawyer R, Holt CL. Le D, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2018 Mar 29;2(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/formative.8112. JMIR Form Res. 2018. PMID: 30684433 Free PMC article.
Romocki LS, Des Marais A, Cofie L, Anderson C, Curington T, Smith JS. Romocki LS, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2019 Aug 6;3(3):e12675. doi: 10.2196/12675. JMIR Form Res. 2019. PMID: 31389334 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3